Newsmax magazine Dec. 2006 Pg. 35
Get rid of secret spending
John Stossel
My comments in red
Fiscal hawks in the Senate, led by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., are sponsoring a bill to create a database that would keep track of Govt. spending. You could search that database from your home and find out who got all that special-interest taxpayer largess.
That seems like useful information for citizens who would like to keep their eyes on their spend-happy representatives.
It certainly DOES.
But whats good for the taxpayers is not necessarily good for the politicians who ladle out our money or the feeders at the government trough who get all those contracts and grants. The power brokers would rather the people not look over their shoulders.
Of COURSE. They want to continue ON their merry way unmonitored by "we the sheeple". They don't care to have "we the people" return.
The bill to create the database has sponsors from both parties, including majority leader Bill Frist and minority leader Harry Reid. It has support from 100 conservative and liberal government-watchdog organizations. It was approved unanimously by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
The measure was headed for a vote in the full Senate when suddenly it was derailed by unidentified Senators. The Senate, it turns out, has a rule that lets any member delay a bill - without revealing his identity. It's called the "secret hold."
This mystery led to several days of speculation, but finally, Sen. Ted Stevens came forward. The next day Sen. Robert C. Byrd did, too.
Byrd has since lifted his hold, but Stevens hasn't. Byrd said he wanted time to read the bill and try to improve it. Stevens, who is a member of the committee that held hearings but didn't speak up at the time, now says he wants a cost-benefit analysis done before he makes up his mind.
Sounds fishy to me. I think these guys just don't want us to see how they spend our money.
I can only second that of course.
I'm skeptical of Sen. Stevens' demand for a cost-benefit study. Congress estimates it would cost $ 4 million to build the database and $ 2 million a year to run it - small potatoes next to the hundreds of billions Sens. Stevens and Byrd spend on pork.
And the benefit ? Can you put a dollar figure on the good that would result if the big spenders were inhibited because the people were watching them ?
Maybe we wouldn't need a user-friendly database if the Government weren't so big. But it is that big. So at least lets make it visible. Lets get rid of secret holds and secret spending.
It's unbeleivable to me that we've let this go as far as we HAVE. We pay these pigs our taxes and have little or no say what they DO with them ? Is this what the founding fathers intended or expected ?