Political Forum

Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

  #131 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 08:57 PM
Darkseid's Avatar
Darkseid Darkseid is offline
Reeve
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 69
[quote=Roundeye;164109]Your first statement I shrugged off as an conspiracy theory that had something to do with some sort of US CIA anti-communist op during the Cold War.

But this second statement... I don't recall an American invasian of the Soviet Union. If you mean Russia, I know what you're referring to, but I don't understand why that has anything to do with this thread (a failed attempt to thwart the rise of communism in Russia by the allied powers during the Russian Civil War?). If you do mean the Soviet Union then I have no clue what you're talking about.

Quote:
Please explain how the US(?) secretly installed the Ba'ath Party in Iraq, and when, how and why exactly the US(?) invaded the Soviet Union after WW I.

Thanks much

I have a professor named Alan Flanders at the TCC campus in Norfolk. He was a teacher at the Newport military school for 25 years. He told me this.

But if you want proof, then maybe I can scrap something together from the internet.



That is a picture of the American Expeditionary Force Siberia that was in the Russian Civil War in Vladivostok, Russia, during the tail end of World War I after the October Revolution, from 1918 to 1920.

"Please explain how the US(?) secretly installed the Ba'ath Party in Iraq, and when, how and why exactly the US(?) invaded the Soviet Union after WW I."

You know the very theme of communism sort of explains away the reasons for why Americans forces would be involved. Maybe you need to understand some things about Woodrow Wilson that you didn't know already.

But let me put it simply. The Russians were becoming communist. Western governments and societies feared communism, example "The Red Scare." If that doesn't explain it to you, then I'm sorry.

As for the Baath regime in Iraq, hold on a sec.

Norm Dixon: How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons
Reagan's WMD Connection to Saddam Hussein
Democracy Now! | The Reagan-Saddam Connection: "We Create These Monsters And When It's Not Convenient We Cover Them Up"
Bear Left!: Three Lessons for America
The crimes of a U.S. ally

As for the puppet part in us bringing him into power. I'm still looking for that. But these should hopefully provide you with enough information about America/Saddam relations.
__________________
I am the Dalai Lama.

http://www.politicsforumpoliticalwor...tml#post166143

Last edited by Darkseid : 04-06-2008 at 09:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #132 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2008, 11:03 PM
Ummwhat's Avatar
Ummwhat Ummwhat is offline
Mercenary
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 379
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLB View Post
One of two British carriers (HMS Invincible) and one of twelve US carriers (USS John C. Stennis).

That is the HMS Illustrious.
__________________
"America is not at war. The U.S. military is at war. America is at the
mall."
Reply With Quote
  #133 (permalink)  
Old 04-07-2008, 11:11 PM
Roundeye's Avatar
Roundeye Roundeye is offline
Squire
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 146
Location: Hawaii
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkseid View Post
I have a professor named Alan Flanders at the TCC campus in Norfolk. He was a teacher at the Newport military school for 25 years. He told me this.

But if you want proof, then maybe I can scrap something together from the internet.

That is a picture of the American Expeditionary Force Siberia that was in the Russian Civil War in Vladivostok, Russia, during the tail end of World War I after the October Revolution, from 1918 to 1920.
The USSR came into existance in 1922.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkseid View Post
You know the very theme of communism sort of explains away the reasons for why Americans forces would be involved. Maybe you need to understand some things about Woodrow Wilson that you didn't know already.

But let me put it simply. The Russians were becoming communist. Western governments and societies feared communism, example "The Red Scare." If that doesn't explain it to you, then I'm sorry.
Now we're getting somewhere. Yeah, nobody liked communism, which is why European, Japanese, US and other forces intervened in the civil war, taking the side of the anti-Bolshevik forces.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkseid View Post
As for the Baath regime in Iraq, hold on a sec.

Norm Dixon: How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons
Reagan's WMD Connection to Saddam Hussein
Democracy Now! | The Reagan-Saddam Connection: "We Create These Monsters And When It's Not Convenient We Cover Them Up"
Bear Left!: Three Lessons for America
The crimes of a U.S. ally

As for the puppet part in us bringing him into power. I'm still looking for that. But these should hopefully provide you with enough information about America/Saddam relations.
Yeah, I know about aiding Iraq during the 80s, but I wanted to know how it was the US put the Ba'ath and Saddam in power. I don't think you will find anything but conspiracy theories. The only thing I've ever seen was someone's idea that the CIA encouraged Ba'ath Party members to stage a coup in Iraq since the previous regime was pro-Soviet. It's not too far-fetched really, but encouraging and placing into power are two very different things.

America chose to side with Saddam in the 80s during the Iran-Iraq War, which seemed like the lesser of two evils, which is why our support officially went to Iraq. Most western countries felt the same way. Yeah yeah, Iran-Contra, another mistake that further bit America in the ass. But I guess we at least learned that you can't make deals with terrorists.
Reply With Quote
  #134 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 12:44 AM
Roundeye's Avatar
Roundeye Roundeye is offline
Squire
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 146
Location: Hawaii
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lying Dutchman View Post
do you honestly believe this?
Yes I do.
Reply With Quote
  #135 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 01:09 AM
Roundeye's Avatar
Roundeye Roundeye is offline
Squire
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 146
Location: Hawaii
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lying Dutchman View Post
nonsense, they 'send it across the border'? forgot that iraq has no friends where they can just stash their nukes for a little while? After not having found any WMD's its clear that the IAEA did their job well at the time.
Yeah, good job, UN.

Here's an article from 2002 which talks about Iraq's wonderful cooperation with the UN, how good of a job the inspectors did and the UN pussy-footing (not the US) as I stated before. You don't see much about this anymore because it's not popular to talk about what was really going on with Iraq.

Disarming Iraq: The Lessons of UNSCOM

From this article
"Moreover, recent reports indicate that Iraq has moved substantial caches of WMD material and resources to safe havens in Syria."

This isn't breaking news, and investigations are ongoing. But how can it be confirmed? Funny how nuclear facilities started popping up in Syria in the 2003 time-frame...
Reply With Quote
  #136 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 05:31 AM
The Lying Dutchman The Lying Dutchman is offline
Governor General
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 663
Location: Amsterdam
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roundeye View Post
Yeah, good job, UN.

Here's an article from 2002 which talks about Iraq's wonderful cooperation with the UN, how good of a job the inspectors did and the UN pussy-footing (not the US) as I stated before. You don't see much about this anymore because it's not popular to talk about what was really going on with Iraq.

Disarming Iraq: The Lessons of UNSCOM

From this article
"Moreover, recent reports indicate that Iraq has moved substantial caches of WMD material and resources to safe havens in Syria."

This isn't breaking news, and investigations are ongoing. But how can it be confirmed? Funny how nuclear facilities started popping up in Syria in the 2003 time-frame...
here's a documentary on the intelligence struggle surrounding the iraq war. its long but gives an insightfull look into how even the president himself thought poorly of the WMD accusations, and how george tenet curbed towards the agenda of cheney.

FRONTLINE: the dark side: watch online | PBS
Reply With Quote
  #137 (permalink)  
Old 04-08-2008, 05:53 AM
Ummwhat's Avatar
Ummwhat Ummwhat is offline
Mercenary
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 379
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roundeye View Post
Yeah, good job, UN.

Here's an article from 2002 which talks about Iraq's wonderful cooperation with the UN, how good of a job the inspectors did and the UN pussy-footing (not the US) as I stated before. You don't see much about this anymore because it's not popular to talk about what was really going on with Iraq.

Disarming Iraq: The Lessons of UNSCOM

From this article
"Moreover, recent reports indicate that Iraq has moved substantial caches of WMD material and resources to safe havens in Syria."

This isn't breaking news, and investigations are ongoing. But how can it be confirmed? Funny how nuclear facilities started popping up in Syria in the 2003 time-frame...
Yup, and that mixed in with the fact that we found the weapons the inspectors could not find when they were there in the 90s lends credence to that claim.
__________________
"America is not at war. The U.S. military is at war. America is at the
mall."
Reply With Quote
  #138 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 12:49 PM
hbloms's Avatar
hbloms hbloms is offline
Conscript
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 34
Location: In a house...
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roundeye View Post
Yeah, good job, UN.

Here's an article from 2002 which talks about Iraq's wonderful cooperation with the UN, how good of a job the inspectors did and the UN pussy-footing (not the US) as I stated before. You don't see much about this anymore because it's not popular to talk about what was really going on with Iraq.

Disarming Iraq: The Lessons of UNSCOM

From this article
"Moreover, recent reports indicate that Iraq has moved substantial caches of WMD material and resources to safe havens in Syria."

This isn't breaking news, and investigations are ongoing. But how can it be confirmed? Funny how nuclear facilities started popping up in Syria in the 2003 time-frame...

If Saddam moved his weapons to Syria why did he himself stay in Iraq? Doesn't that sound a bit stupid of the dictator wanted by the invading army..?
__________________
"Democracy has nothing to do with freedom. It's just an oppressors way of suppressing a minority..."

"Everyone's a pacifist between wars. It's like being a vegetarian between meals."

"Knowledge is knowing how to, Wisdom is knowing why."

"An open mind is like a castle, with its gates unbarred and guards asleep."
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right