Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 01-04-2007, 01:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Hazelnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 47
And This Nutcase Was On The Highest Court Of The Land???

FBI:*Rehnquist withdrew from painkillers - CNN.com

FBI: Rehnquist withdrew from painkillers

POSTED: 10:41 a.m. EST, January 4, 2007

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The FBI's file on former Chief Justice William Rehnquist -- made public more than a year after his death -- offers insight into hallucinations and other symptoms of withdrawal that Rehnquist suffered when he was taken off a prescription painkiller in 1981.

A doctor was cited as saying that Rehnquist, an associate justice of the Supreme Court at the time, tried to escape the hospital in his pajamas and imagined that the CIA was plotting against him.

The FBI on Wednesday released 1,561 pages of documents on Rehnquist to news organizations and scholars in response to requests made under the Freedom of Information Act following Rehnquist's death in September 2005. An additional 207 pages were withheld under the federal disclosure law, and the FBI said an entire section of his file could not be found.

Much of the FBI's file on Rehnquist appears to have been compiled almost exclusively for his two Senate confirmations -- his initial nomination to the court by President Nixon in 1971 and his nomination as chief justice by President Reagan in 1986. Administration officials apparently hoped to prevent any surprises from sinking his nominations.

In 1971, Deputy Attorney General Richard Kleindienst directed the FBI to conduct investigations of witnesses who were planning to testify at a Senate hearing against Rehnquist's confirmation.

Fifteen years later, during the Reagan administration, the FBI was enlisted to conduct background checks on witnesses who were scheduled to testify against Rehnquist's nomination to become chief justice.

The late Sen. Strom Thurmond, a South Carolina Republican, was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1986 when Rehnquist was nominated to be chief justice. John Bolton, who resigned in December as President Bush's U.N. ambassador, was an assistant attorney general under Reagan.

"Thurmond just gave these names to Bolton they will testify for the Democrats and we want to know what they are going to say," a Justice Department official told a counterpart at the FBI, according to a memo in Rehnquist's file.

Alexander Charns, a Durham, North Carolina, lawyer who received the file and has extensively researched the FBI's relationship with the court, said the new disclosures show the Nixon and Reagan administrations went to some lengths to discredit Rehnquist opponents.

The file also indicates the two administrations enlisted the FBI's help in blunting criticism of him during confirmation hearings.

"In many ways, I guess it's the same old story of the political use of the FBI," Charns said.

The documents show that the FBI was aware in 1971 that Rehnquist had owned a home in Phoenix with a deed that allowed him to sell only to whites. The restrictive covenant was not disclosed until his 1986 confirmation hearings, at which Rehnquist said he became aware of the clause only days earlier.

Also detailed in the declassified file was Rehnquist's 1981 hospital stay for treatment of back pain and his dependence on powerful prescription pain-relief medication.

The FBI investigated his dependence on Placidyl, which Rehnquist had taken for at least 10 years, according to a summary of a 1970 medical examination.

When Rehnquist checked into a hospital in 1981 for a weeklong stay, doctors stopped administering the drug, causing what a hospital spokesman at the time said was a "disturbance in mental clarity."

The FBI file, citing one of his physicians, said Rehnquist experienced withdrawal symptoms that included trying to escape the facility and discerning changes in the patterns on the hospital curtains. The justice also thought he heard voices outside his room discussing various plots against him.

The doctor said Placidyl is a highly toxic drug and that she could not understand why anyone would prescribe it, especially for long periods.

Prior to his hospitalization, Rehnquist occasionally slurred his speech in his questions to lawyers at Supreme Court arguments. Those problems ceased when he changed medications, the doctor said.

Charns said some of the censored documents provide intriguing hints of what else Rehnquist's file might contain.

In one previously secret memo from 1971, an FBI official wrote, "No persons interviewed during our current or 1969 investigation furnished information bearing adversely on Rehnquist's morals or professional integrity; however ..." The next third of the page is blacked out, under the disclosure law's exception for matters of national security.

"It would be nice to know what is still classified, three decades later," Charns said.
Hazelnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 04:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
CHUQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: the South
Posts: 3,499
Send a message via AIM to CHUQ
My fav part of this story is the FBI says a whole section of the file cannot be found. What was on this that needed to be lost?
__________________
STUPIDITY Is The Deliberate Cultivation Of Ignorance

TRUTH exist, only a falsehood has to be invented.

Please Visit My Blog http://studiesandobservations.blogspot.com/
CHUQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 08:12 PM   #3 (permalink)
Marquis
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,170
And this information HAD to be available to the people who nominated him AND the people from BOTH parties who confirmed him.

Makes it tough to pick a political party to side with, doesn't it?
__________________
Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots.
Scribbler1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 12:00 AM   #4 (permalink)
Earl
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,559
Nothing wrong with his written opinions. In fact, I'd say he had far more respect for the Constitution than Stephen Breyer, who when asked how he decides cases, never once mentioned the Constitution.
__________________
chicken butt
francois60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 05:29 AM   #5 (permalink)
Moderator
 
CHUQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: the South
Posts: 3,499
Send a message via AIM to CHUQ
It guess that would be a matter of opinion. I guess it is ok for our so called leaders to be ripped, kinda like JFK, but not for others like Rush (BTW, I am not a Rush fan).
__________________
STUPIDITY Is The Deliberate Cultivation Of Ignorance

TRUTH exist, only a falsehood has to be invented.

Please Visit My Blog http://studiesandobservations.blogspot.com/
CHUQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 12:22 PM   #6 (permalink)
Marquis
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois60 View Post
Nothing wrong with his written opinions. In fact, I'd say he had far more respect for the Constitution than Stephen Breyer, who when asked how he decides cases, never once mentioned the Constitution.
His written opinions might well have been written by a clerk who was charged with making sense out of the man's ramblings. These people are pretty insulated once they hit the top of the legal Mt. Olympus.
__________________
Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots.
Scribbler1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right