|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|

10-30-2007, 01:35 PM
|
|
Conscript
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
|
|
|
Homosexuality is NOT natural.
Anyways im willing to challenge anyone and dare prove to me homosexuality is natural,its already not part of natural selection and as for homosexuality in animal is caused by humans why?Animals do everything based on instinict and to maintain surivival which includes reproduction.
Anyways let me post the natural selection defintion
Natural selection is the process by which favorable traits that are heritable become more common in successive generations of a population of reproducing organisms, and unfavorable traits that are heritable become less common. Natural selection acts on the phenotype, or the observable characteristics of an organism, such that individuals with favorable phenotypes are more likely to survive and reproduce than those with less favorable phenotypes.
Natural selection is based on reproduction for the specie to pass on to the next specie but homosexuality obviously doesnt cause reproduction,so obviously it isnt against natural selection and goes against natural selection doesn it?
And oh yeah NO researchers have found ANY homosexual gene(and you can search it up yourself).
This study found NO homosexuality gene
No "homosexual gene" can be found, new study says.
"There is no evidence for the "gay gene" that a study claims to have found.
BBC World Service's John Newell: Is this research needed?
Previous research suggested that male homosexuality is passed on from mother to son.
But the new work, covering more people, aims to show that the particular genetic features implicated are no more common in gay men than would be expected.
"Because our study was larger than the original one, we certainly had adequate power to detect a genetic effect as large as was reported in that study," said the team from the University of Western Ontario in the journal, Science."
Now since homosexuality isnt genetic and it is based on environmental this makes me question if it is natural,and as for homosexuality in animals I have to question that aswell.
For animals they go by instinicts and survival so why would a animal be invovled in a homosexual relationship knowing it wont help the animal reproduce or help it maintain surival?
Seems like homosexuality in animals is a theory,but if it does exist then it exists because man has made animal goe against nature's will of what animal instincit is.
Last edited by W.E.B. Du Bois : 10-30-2007 at 01:38 PM.
Reason: broken link fixed
|

10-30-2007, 01:55 PM
|
|
Earl
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,755
Country:
|
|
|
Most studies (all that I have seen) regarding gay animals, have forced the animals to be gay. Keeping a bunch of males together, with no isolation and no females, until they do something regarded as homosexual.
|

10-30-2007, 02:01 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Tyler Durden
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,982
Location: Dothan, AL
Country:
|
|
Quote:
|
Homosexuality is NOT natural.
|
Neither is scuba diving. 
__________________
Neither am I the means to any end others may wish to accomplish. I am not a tool for their use. I am not a servant of their needs. I am not a bandage for their wounds. I am not a sacrifice on their altars. ... I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask no one to live for me, nor do I live for others. I covet no mans soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet.
Ayn Rand, Anthem.
|

10-30-2007, 02:02 PM
|
|
Earl
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,755
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRYandBENDER
Neither is scuba diving. 
|
  Say it ain't so!  
|

10-30-2007, 02:16 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,295
Country:
|
|
|
I'd say gays are natural in so far as anything can be called "natural." All biological human conditions can be regarded as "natural." With genes, there is a lot of randomization. Why don't you look the exact same as your brother? How come you are both not the same height and weight? That is because there is some randomization involved when people reproduce.
I think that some people are born gay and others choose to be gay.
WEB
|

10-30-2007, 02:29 PM
|
|
Earl
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,755
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
I'd say gays are natural in so far as anything can be called "natural." All biological human conditions can be regarded as "natural." With genes, there is a lot of randomization. Why don't you look the exact same as your brother? How come you are both not the same height and weight? That is because there is some randomization involved when people reproduce.
I think that some people are born gay and others choose to be gay.
WEB
|
I would disagree with the "born" aspect. Homosexuallity isn't in the Genes, it can't be genetic and a choice. You don't have some people that are born with down syndrome and other that chose to have down syndrome.
From my expirences and individual research, I believe that homosexuallity is just a sexual curiosity. The percentage of people in the age group of 18 - 25 is vastly larger than that of 55+ age group. The younger age group is also much more abundant of sexual curiosity. Changing partners every other week, trying different things to see what they like, and homosexuality is one of the things that many of them try to see if they like it.
If Homosexuallity was genetic, than when the US began to except it, the older people that were naturally gay would come out, because back when they were young, it was greatly frowned upon (to say the least), so they would have to hide it.
|

10-30-2007, 02:47 PM
|
|
Banned
Big Governments Worst Nightmare
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,377
|
|
|
Well I know from working AIDS clinics, where gay people were the majority, I would have to say it is not genetic at all. Most of the gay people who came in there were starved for attention. They would try and shock you with their stories and "flame".
|

10-30-2007, 03:01 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,295
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon Elephant
I would disagree with the "born" aspect. Homosexuallity isn't in the Genes, it can't be genetic and a choice. You don't have some people that are born with down syndrome and other that chose to have down syndrome.
|
What about diabetes? Some are born with it, others give it to themselves. You just picked a random disease and said that because that's not genetic, then homosexuality is not genetic. It doesn't logically follow that because one condition is not chosen by preference that therefore ALL possible human conditions are not chosen by preference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon Elephant
From my expirences and individual research, I believe that homosexuallity is just a sexual curiosity. The percentage of people in the age group of 18 - 25 is vastly larger than that of 55+ age group. The younger age group is also much more abundant of sexual curiosity. Changing partners every other week, trying different things to see what they like, and homosexuality is one of the things that many of them try to see if they like it.
If Homosexuallity was genetic, than when the US began to except it, the older people that were naturally gay would come out, because back when they were young, it was greatly frowned upon (to say the least), so they would have to hide it.
|
I think that the persistence of homosexuality despite the heavy ostracism and disgrace that people heap upon homosexuals indicates that some people are born gay. As well as closet gays who have families but go and have sex in a men's restroom. Why would a married man with children go out and have gay sex covertly? It's obviously not for attention, since it is by definition secret sex. You could say it's curiousity, but then wouldn't one be curious about doing something one is biologically inclined to do? I've never ate shit, but that doesn't mean I'm going to try some out of curiousity.
WEB
|

10-30-2007, 03:09 PM
|
|
Banned
Big Governments Worst Nightmare
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,377
|
|
Quote:
I think that the persistence of homosexuality despite the heavy ostracism and disgrace that people heap upon homosexuals indicates that some people are born gay. As well as closet gays who have families but go and have sex in a men's restroom. Why would a married man with children go out and have gay sex covertly? It's obviously not for attention, since it is by definition secret sex. You could say it's curiousity, but then wouldn't one be curious about doing something one is biologically inclined to do? I've never ate shit, but that doesn't mean I'm going to try some out of curiousity. 
WEB
|
Well I think you just described a mental disorder or a disease. If the married man is doing it covertly then he knows it is wrong to begin with. So either he is a sex addict/pedophile or is sick in the head.
|

10-30-2007, 03:12 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,295
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessGovMrPrez
Well I think you just described a mental disorder or a disease. If the married man is doing it covertly then he knows it is wrong to begin with. So either he is a sex addict/pedophile or is sick in the head.
|
Well sure you think it is a mental disorder or disease, as well as immoral, but that is not logical disproof that it is not driven by a biological impulse as well. If you want to call it a disease, even then you are implicitly admitting it is biological (although of course with the negative word choice, but biological nonetheless).
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|