|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|

08-09-2007, 12:34 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,417
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pelkgator
WEB,
I apologize. I thought you were speaking generally in the JOE scenerio. Yes he will probably still get from wal-mart and sell to kids. But I bet the bulk of his business right now is from adults. And if he was religated to just selling to kids then he may not stay in the business. I do not however think that keeping it illegal is anyway keeping it out of kids hands.
|
So let me just get something straight here. How many different kinds of drugs are you in favor of legalizing?
Weed? Cocaine? Heroin? Ecstasy? Crystal-meth?
WEB
|

08-09-2007, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,417
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by micfranklin
It's like abortion: their bodies = their choices. If they want to fuck themselves up with coke and meth, then let them. Most people, including minors, who want drugs will get them, law or no law.
|
Well I'm just going to universally disagree with you that people should be abandoned to their own human folly. I find it disgusting to just make available to people things which would destroy them.
WEB
|

08-09-2007, 01:10 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Tyler Durden
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,000
Location: Dothan, AL
Country:
|
|
|
So should we prohibit tobacco and alcohol?
__________________
Neither am I the means to any end others may wish to accomplish. I am not a tool for their use. I am not a servant of their needs. I am not a bandage for their wounds. I am not a sacrifice on their altars. ... I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask no one to live for me, nor do I live for others. I covet no mans soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet.
Ayn Rand, Anthem.
|

08-09-2007, 01:20 PM
|
|
Baron
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,114
Location: Pensacola, FL
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRYandBENDER
So should we prohibit tobacco and alcohol?
|
Alcohol, no. That experiment didnt' work.
Tobacco will be very rarely used in the U.S. in 100 yrs. The percentage of smokers has dropped by 50% in the last 40 yrs or so.
__________________
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
— Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love
|

08-09-2007, 01:23 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Tyler Durden
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,000
Location: Dothan, AL
Country:
|
|
|
Exactly. Granted Meth is probably a lot more addictive than nicotine, but I don't see why one line of thinking should apply in some cases and not to others. If we can use the "Its my body and my life" argument for abortion, alcohol, and tobacco I don't see why that line of thinking wouldn't apply outside of those issues.
__________________
Neither am I the means to any end others may wish to accomplish. I am not a tool for their use. I am not a servant of their needs. I am not a bandage for their wounds. I am not a sacrifice on their altars. ... I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask no one to live for me, nor do I live for others. I covet no mans soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet.
Ayn Rand, Anthem.
|

08-09-2007, 02:35 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,417
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRYandBENDER
So should we prohibit tobacco and alcohol?
|
No prohibition on alcohol. As for tobacco, just make sure that people who smoke it only kill themselves and not others with their second-hand smoke.
WEB
|

08-09-2007, 02:36 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,417
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRYandBENDER
Exactly. Granted Meth is probably a lot more addictive than nicotine, but I don't see why one line of thinking should apply in some cases and not to others. If we can use the "Its my body and my life" argument for abortion, alcohol, and tobacco I don't see why that line of thinking wouldn't apply outside of those issues.
|
I don't know much about meth, but it seems to be the scourge of poor white communities. I just can't see how the scourge of a group of people is something that people should legally allow and facilitate.
WEB
|

08-09-2007, 02:46 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Tyler Durden
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,000
Location: Dothan, AL
Country:
|
|
|
I know this goes against your line of reason, but the way I see it is like this. They're doing it anyways. If they want to ruin their lives then I'm not going to stop them. I think we would do better to spend the money on enforcement and imprisonment on rehabilitation..... if they want it that is. We'd save a ton of money and our law enforcement could focus on real criminals. Anyways, if someone is stupid enough to get addicted to meth then maybe we'd be better off with out them. Assuming of coarse they kill themselves with it. At least they'll die doing what they love.
__________________
Neither am I the means to any end others may wish to accomplish. I am not a tool for their use. I am not a servant of their needs. I am not a bandage for their wounds. I am not a sacrifice on their altars. ... I owe nothing to my brothers, nor do I gather debts from them. I ask no one to live for me, nor do I live for others. I covet no mans soul, nor is my soul theirs to covet.
Ayn Rand, Anthem.
|

08-09-2007, 02:54 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,417
Country:
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fry
Anyways, if someone is stupid enough to get addicted to meth then maybe we'd be better off with out them.
|
I will not even attempt to argue against your comment because of this. I see no point. We seem to have a fundamental difference in the value we place on the lives of other people. You have a "fuck em" attitude towards weaker people, I do not.
WEB
|

08-09-2007, 03:05 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,319
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
Well I'm just going to universally disagree with you that people should be abandoned to their own human folly. I find it disgusting to just make available to people things which would destroy them.
WEB
|
So uh, what about alcohol? Surely drinking too much of that is more deadly than weed would ever be.
And it's still Prohibition: it didn't work with alcohol in the 1920's and it won't work now. Some people never learn.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|