Political Forum

Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2008, 10:34 PM
Fong Fong is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 203
Private Medicine in NHS Costs Taxpayer Millions.

A recent report by an auditor of NHS services has found that the NHS has written off $8.8m Dollars of work done for private companies and Governments, in just four NHS Trusts.

BBC NEWS | Health | Millions lost in NHS private fees

Great Ormond Street Hospital alone wrote of $6m dollars worth of debt owed for work done for private concerns.

Some of the outstanding debts are from the Kuwaiti Government, a Greek insurance company amd Bupa, one of the larger insurance companies in Britain.

For anyone that doesn't know, there are about 50-60 NHS Trusts in the UK, all of varying sizes.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2008, 11:01 PM
Brother Oz Brother Oz is offline
Viceroy
Sophist
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,077
Location: Wales
Country:
Ok, so we're talking about something along the lines of $100 million altogether right then, approximately? How long was this over?

I want to know why they're doing private jobs in the first place. Foreigners fair enough, it's pretty difficult to realise straight away that they need to be charged, and if there's a guy dying they're going to treat now and charge later. But what's with this other private work? They're NHS trusts, that stuff should be used as part of their normal service, not for profit.
__________________
... I am surprised at your insolence in writing to me at all. You know, as I know, that I bought this constituency... may God's curse light upon you and may it make your women as open and as free to the excise officers as your wives and daughters have always been to me while I have represented your scoundrel corporation.
I have the honour to be... your obliged humble servant, Anthony Henley
- MPs reply to constituent, mid 1700s
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2008, 05:57 AM
Fong Fong is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother Oz View Post
Ok, so we're talking about something along the lines of $100 million altogether right then, approximately? How long was this over?

I want to know why they're doing private jobs in the first place. Foreigners fair enough, it's pretty difficult to realise straight away that they need to be charged, and if there's a guy dying they're going to treat now and charge later. But what's with this other private work? They're NHS trusts, that stuff should be used as part of their normal service, not for profit.
It is this desire by Government to make every public department turn a profit for someone.

You can't 'sell' the NHS Trusts to a consortium of financers, without generating profit for them, the only way to really generate profit from the NHS (without directly giving Taxpayers money to these people) is to hire out the services it provides to private insurance companies.

Now money can be generated that doesn't come directly from the taxpayer, but which the taxpayer created, that they can siphon off without a lot of bad press. If they just took directly from the budget of the NHS Trust, people would be peeved that our tax money was going straight into private pockets.

There is supposed to be a good reason, the reason being that once the financers get involved they help streamline the running of the NHS Trust to maximise profits, thus helping the NHS to run efficiently.

The problem is the financers do not care about level of care.

Which is why we had a Hospital in Kent with 90 avoidable deaths, due to a lack of good cleaning, purely on the basis that the financers found that transient, untrained labour was far far cheaper so used that instead. The fact that transient untrained labour didn't do the job properly, was not an issue that was high on their agenda. Until 90 people died and the press got involved.

It is strange that they can take our taxes, spend it on services, then sell those services privately for a profit and that doesn't seem to bother too many people.

It didn't seem to bother too many when they did the same thing to the Water, Electric, Phone, Army Housing etc etc etc. So I suppose we shouldn't be surprised by this either.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right