A wise man once told me never to argue with folk who hold sincere religious beliefs for two reasons.
1. If they are really convinced in their beliefs you won't change them and will just be wasting your time.
2. If you do convince them that their belief is in error you will take something valuable from them and replace it with nothing.
However I have never been one to listen to wise people -What the hell do they know
To go back to the start of this thread where the originator is complaining about atheists talking out.
For centuries anyone who expressed doubt about the current doctorine of the day could expect little respect of their views. I have in mind hundreds of years of persecution of heretics with some very imaginative methods of bringing the unfaithful back to the fold (burning at the stake was one of the more humane)
Nowadays when we have a more open view of free speech one can still be threatened with hell and damnation simply by asking those of a faith to explain upon what evidence they base their assertions.
The usual reponse is "Scripture" or tradition or just faith. When the point is pushed one is normally said to be offensive or evil.
When a non-theist (less negative than atheist) is confronted he/she is not expected to take offence.
If I was to say that I just have faith that the tooth fairy exists, or that there is a little teapot in orbit around Mars or that the world is flat. I am asked to prove it . Why are we asked to accept a far more fanciful concept on no evidence what so ever??
If you want to believe that God exists and actually pays any interest in what mankind gets up to you are free to, but don't try to push it down my throat (metaphorically speaking) and don't complain when someone asks for some proof that the believer should be accorded special deferrance.
Over to you.