|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|

08-08-2007, 01:58 PM
|
 |
Nicest Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,638
Location: USA
Country:
|
|
|
Oh, also, I do agree. Islam will remain backwards as long as they treat at least half of their population as worthless commodities for the other half of the population. Unless they decide to pick and choose as the other major religions have done... they will most likely stay where they are. It's unfortunate.
__________________

|

08-08-2007, 02:27 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 407
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzibeth
Of course I am not condoning the treatment of women by Islam. But how some people can sit here and say "barbaric!" and then go home and choose to read specific chapters in a book that they are supposed to be living by in it's entirety that happens to have the exact same things written in it... makes no sense to me. Yes. Islam is barbaric in the way it treats women and expects women to behave. But the Bible says the same thing. What does that make you?
|
Islam is barbaric! Seventh century barbaric! Whereas for centuries Christianity and Judaism were also barbaric and held back the progress of mankind for centuries like Islam, they eventually both underwent reformations that allowed for the further evolution of mankind into modernity. The harmful and inferior aspects of Christianity and Judaism were cast aside while the beneficial and superior aspects were retained.
Further, the holy books of Christianity and Judaism never purported themselves to be the direct, divine, and immutable word of God, so they never were understood to be taken literally, whereas, on the other hand, the holy book of Islam, the Quran, has always been said to be the direct, divine, and immutable word of God and so can only be taken literally.
Islam in effect is a bastardization of both Christianity and Judaism and to make his religion supreme over all other religions, Mohammed claimed that he was God’s final prophet and that his message superseded the messages of all other prophets before him and also that there would be no prophets after him. To further make his religion supreme above all others, Mohammed also claimed that his message was the direct word of God as delivered to him by the archangel Gabriel.
|

08-08-2007, 02:36 PM
|
 |
Nicest Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,638
Location: USA
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joeblough
Islam is barbaric! Seventh century barbaric! Whereas for centuries Christianity and Judaism were also barbaric and held back the progress of mankind for centuries like Islam, they eventually both underwent reformations that allowed for the further evolution of mankind into modernity. The harmful and inferior aspects of Christianity and Judaism were cast aside while the beneficial and superior aspects were retained.
|
They "reformed" by picking and choosing which parts of their holy book to ignore and which parts to follow. It does not erase the fact that there are many, many references to the horrible treatment of women and the fact that women are less-than in comparison to men in those texts. They are just ignored (by many).
Quote:
|
Further, the holy books of Christianity and Judaism never purported themselves to be the direct, divine, and immutable word of God, so they never were understood to be taken literally, whereas, on the other hand, the holy book of Islam, the Quran, has always been said to be the direct, divine, and immutable word of God and so can only be taken literally.
|
I have never heard that the holy books of Christianity and Judaism are not the direct, divine, and immutable word of God. Never. This is the absolute first time I am hearing this. There is soooo much debate saying that it IS... that I don't actually even know where you are getting that idea from.
Quote:
|
Islam in effect is a bastardization of both Christianity and Judaism and to make his religion supreme over all other religions, Mohammed claimed that he was God’s final prophet and that his message superseded the messages of all other prophets before him and also that there would be no prophets after him. To further make his religion supreme above all others, Mohammed also claimed that his message was the direct word of God as delivered to him by the archangel Gabriel.
|
Whatever Islam may be or may not be... it's basis and it's holy texts hold the same information about the treatment of women as the Bible and other Christian/Jewish holy texts. Again, my point is... Christians and Jews simply have chosen over time which parts to ignore. I'm not hearing anything that is rejecting what I'm saying.. Only excuses as to why Islam is somehow worse (because they stick to their texts instead of ignoring certain parts)... and also this weird claim that you're making that Christians and Jews don't believe the Bible to be the divine and immutable word of God.
__________________

|

08-08-2007, 02:40 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 407
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzibeth
Wait..... what? Christianity and Judaism does not teach that the Bible is a holy book which was dictated by God himself (some parts written by him like the Ten Commandments and their punishments)? Perfect and direct?
|
Only the 10 commandants are the direct word of God.
Quote:
|
This is news to me. I have never heard anyone say "This is an imperfect book which was written by men who thought they might know what God wanted people to do and say" about the Bible. Please let me know where I should go to hear this.
|
It is assumed that the Old Testament had numerous authors and the apostles wrote the New Testament.
|

08-08-2007, 02:47 PM
|
|
Baron
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,114
Location: Pensacola, FL
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzibeth
Sorry but... God says to women "submit and serve" and says to men "love like you love yourself". I would say that the burden falls on the women.
|
It says "25 Husbands should love their wives, just as Christ loved the Church and sacrificed himself for her." That means that a man should serve his wife and give his life up for her, if needed. That's a pretty damned big responsibility.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzibeth
That's... pretty irrelevent. It says plain as day right there that the man is head of the woman. The rest can be interpreted in a number of different ways, but mostly "awww, isn't that sweet?" kind of way. It is metaphorical. "Man is head of the woman" is not metaphorical. It is straight up.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzibeth
It also says that man should know that he comes from a woman. Of course I am not condoning the treatment of women by Islam. But how some people can sit here and say "barbaric!" and then go home and choose to read specific chapters in a book that they are supposed to be living by in it's entirety that happens to have the exact same things written in it... makes no sense to me. Yes. Islam is barbaric in the way it treats women and expects women to behave. But the Bible says the same thing. What does that make you?
|
Christ doesn't beat up his Church, so men shouldn't beat up their wives. The relationship is the same--a husband should treat his wife, like Christ treated his followers. While a man may be the leader of his family, that doesn't make him the owner of them. He should be giving up his life for their sake.
__________________
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
— Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love
|

08-08-2007, 03:18 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 407
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzibeth
Only excuses as to why Islam is somehow worse (because they stick to their texts instead of ignoring certain parts)...
|
Actually, I’m an agnostic but the difference is Christianity and Judaism has undergone reformations whereas Islam has not.
Why one religion is worse than the other religions is because Islam has several major and unique problems the others don’t have. For instance, if one is a Catholic he or she can choose to simply stop attending church services at any time. In Islam that is considered to be apostasy and apostasy under Islam is punishable by the pain of death, although today with the infiltration of Muslims into the West it no longer is always enforced but still always remains a constant threat for those who do choose to openly leave Islam. Additionally, if one is a Catholic, one can also choose to change denominations at anytime. Again in Islam, that would be considered apostasy.
As I already explained Islam considers itself as being supreme above all other religions and it believes that all other religions must be made to submit to Islam. As a matter of fact, Islam divides the world into two spheres, the house of Islam (dar al Islam) and the house of disbelief (dar al Harb), or in other words, between believers and unbelievers, and Islam commands all Muslims to eliminate the house of disbelief until all that remains is the house of Islam so that Allah’s writ (Islamic Sharia Law) can be imposed upon it, and once Allah’s writ has been imposed, non-Muslims are to be converted, subjugated into Dhimmitude, and/or killed.
As for as I know, neither Christianity nor Judaism has anything remotely resembling that kind of supremacism that calls for world domination with the subjugation or death of non-believers, and the way Islam treats apostasy is more like a cult than a religion.
|

08-08-2007, 03:23 PM
|
 |
Nicest Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,638
Location: USA
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by perdidochas
It says "25 Husbands should love their wives, just as Christ loved the Church and sacrificed himself for her." That means that a man should serve his wife and give his life up for her, if needed. That's a pretty damned big responsibility.
|
If you would like, I can go through and name all of the huge responsibilities in the Bible that women are expected to have. You say "serve" but that word is not explicitly said. It is explicitly said for women. Not men. If they meant it I'm sure they would have said it. And believe me... women are just as expected to die for their men (if not moreso since a woman's shame reflects directly on her husband in many texts) as men are for women. If that's all you got... well...
Quote:
|
Christ doesn't beat up his Church, so men shouldn't beat up their wives. The relationship is the same--a husband should treat his wife, like Christ treated his followers. While a man may be the leader of his family, that doesn't make him the owner of them. He should be giving up his life for their sake.
|
I can quote many passages that condone the beating and murder of women for various "offenses". Also passages that claim that the man IS the owner of his family. Perhaps he should be giving up his life for their sake if it is necessary (in protection of them) but it is more important for him to stay alive and help his family to live as well. Dying is not the most important thing a man can do for his family.
__________________

|

08-08-2007, 03:31 PM
|
 |
Nicest Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,638
Location: USA
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joeblough
Only the 10 commandants are the direct word of God.
It is assumed that the Old Testament had numerous authors and the apostles wrote the New Testament.
|
I think if you ask the average Christian if the Bible is the direct, divine, and immutable word of God they would say "YES!". It is assumed that the Old Testament had numerous authors and the apostles wrote the New Testament (some will say no to this too) BUT they were being directly spoken to or inspired by the one and only God. HE wrote the texts through them. Those texts are divine, immutable, and direct. If you asked the average believer if they thought that the Bible was the "flawed word of God as interpreted by humans" they would not agree.
Being agnostic, you don't believe that (I'm not going to assume to know anything else about what you may or may not believe) but they do. And that's what matters in this situation. No.. they may not beat their wives anymore or smash them over the head with rocks if they had premarital sex but it SAYS to in the book. Just as it says to in the Islamic books. Christians and Jews have simply chosen to ignore those parts (I know I am repeating it for the millionth time). They had a lapse in which a more rational voice was able to come forth and say "hey! no more stonings!" but Islam has not had that lapse. Again. My point. Don't sit around saying "barbarians!" towards another religion for following it's doctrine strictly when your own holy book says for you to do the exact same things and you are simply hypocritical in ignoring the parts you don't like anymore.
It's wrong because it's wrong. Their religion is as barbaric as Christianity or Judaism. Modern Christians and Jews are just omitting certain parts of theirs. Islam does not.
__________________

|

08-08-2007, 03:49 PM
|
|
Mercenary
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 281
|
|
|
Were You Being Ironic?
Quote:
|
perdidochas: In terms of quote 5, you forgot the rest of the passage, which, if anything, puts more burden on the man.
|
This is the whole thrust of the video Imam's rant.
'
Last edited by Apotropoxy : 08-08-2007 at 03:51 PM.
Reason: .
|

08-12-2007, 11:29 AM
|
 |
Knight
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 535
Location: Dallas, TX
|
|
|
Well, I think it's possible that many unbelievers also pick and choose certain parts of the Bible, while also taking it out of context; because they mistakenly assume that Israel's old constitution would be applied today by Christians. But the New Testament is considered to be the dispensation of grace, and Jesus showed this by stopping the Jews from stoning the adulterous woman. So we live in a new era, which is why it's called the New Testament. BTW, both men and women were supposed to be stoned for adultery during the Old Testament. Not just women. Yet still, the days of the Old Testament were harsh, and sin was not a casual thing during that time.
No doubt, many women did not have the same privileges as men during the days of the Old Testament; but they were also supposed to be taken care of and looked after by their male counterparts. Even then, we look in the book of Judges and see that a female, by the name of Deborah, was anointed and chosen by G-d to be a Judge; and as result, she led the nation of Israel for 40 years. It's really kind of hard to argue against that point. We also see other women like Ruth and Esther playing important roles in the days of the Old Testament, even having their own books of the Bible named after them.
But like others have stated, the Bible clearly states that a man is to love a women as himself, just as Christ loves the church. It's a two way relationship, though some female libs don't like the idea of hearing that a wife is to submit herself to her husband. But we are talking about what is supposed to be a loving relationship, not an abusive one.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|