|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|

06-21-2007, 04:12 PM
|
|
Temporarily Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 337
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by perdidochas
However, the purpose of the vouchers was to allow parents to choose an alternative to failing public schools. The purpose is not religious. It is similar to the way the GI bill and pell grants, etc., can go to church-based colleges. The intent is to increase education, not promote religion.
|
You make a good point. What particular case are we talking about? Is there an federal appeals court decision in the matter?
Was there an allegation or finding that the voucher plan was a subterfuge or pretext?
|

06-21-2007, 04:33 PM
|
|
Baron
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,114
Location: Pensacola, FL
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FredFlashInTexas
You make a good point. What particular case are we talking about? Is there an federal appeals court decision in the matter?
Was there an allegation or finding that the voucher plan was a subterfuge or pretext?
|
Never got to federal court.
USATODAY.com - Fla. Supreme Court strikes down school vouchers
__________________
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
— Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love
|

06-21-2007, 07:39 PM
|
|
Temporarily Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 337
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blues_127
Another post here about education has lead me to a subject that bugs the hell out of me....Maybe it will spur some discussion.
How do you seperate church and state in a government of the people and by the people without ultimately making religion illegal?
My example before was the school voucher system. Alot of parents liked it and immediately sought to send there students to their preffered schools, many were religious schools....becuase checks were cut by the government the voucher sysytem was held to be an illegal blending of church and state.
This in effect told parents that the attempt to give children their religious values in education was illegal.
|
What voucher system are you talking about, Whammer Jammer?
Who is the greatest blues man of all time?
|

06-23-2007, 09:10 AM
|
|
Temporarily Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 337
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blues_127
So, civil government is formed by who?
|
That depends on which government you're talking about. The U. S. Government was adopted by the people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blues_127
When did the government and the people get separated in the US?
|
Beats me, dude. When?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blues_127
Do they not represent those parents interests with those parents tax dollars.
|
Our political rules represent our secular interests, not our religious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blues_127
I want my money back if I have to trade secularism for my faith
|
What civil law or policy requires you to trade secularism (the ideology that certain practices or institutions should exist separately from religion or religious belief) for your faith? Are you advocating civil power over your religion?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blues_127
They do trespass on the Jurisdiction of God by telling those parents it's ok to go to secular schools, we'll pay for that but nothing else.
|
God does not have jurisdiction over secular education. The civil government does.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blues_127
Usually, private Church schools well surpass the carriclum (sp?) of state run schools...
|
How do they surpass it?
Last edited by FredFlashInTexas : 06-24-2007 at 12:35 PM.
|

06-27-2007, 09:23 AM
|
|
Temporarily Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 337
Country:
|
|
...ethics and religion is being eliminated from the schools...
Bishop Andrews declared that the schools should be improved by elementary religious instruction. "Gradually," says Mr. Nicholas Murray Butler, President of the Industrial Education Society of New York, "all mention of ethics and religion is being eliminated from the schools; and it is even fashionable to make ethics an elective study in our colleges and universities"; and he says that this is producing young men who "look upon fashion or social convenience as the arbiter of morals, and when this stage is reached the disease of moral illiteracy has set in."
--The Evangelical Conference at Washington, Page 649, Rev. Walter Elliott (1888)
|

06-27-2007, 11:21 PM
|
|
Mercenary
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 346
Country:
|
|
[quote]
Quote:
Originally Posted by panteth4h2o
Heh. Some certain number of people at another forum where I used to be a member. 
|
Hmmm...seems like I know what you're talking about.... 
Quote:
|
Well, if that's the case, then I expect they will take everything out of the government right down to prayer in public office and to recognition of the Christmas holiday, unless they want to recognize it as national "Winter Holiday". Not that the commercialism of Christmas resembles anything Christian anyways.
|
And that's the future...
__________________
Our fears in Banquo stick deep; and in his royalty of nature reigns that which would be fear'd: 'tis much he dares; And, to that dauntless temper of his mind, he hath a wisdom that doth guide his valour to act in safety.
[I]Macbeth[/I] 3:1
|

06-28-2007, 10:52 AM
|
|
Temporarily Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 337
Country:
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fred
That was the case when Protestantism, and then Protestant/Catholicism, was the overwhelming majority in America. In 2007, that is no longer the case and views other than Protestant/Catholicism have significant political power and demand that all religion be exempt from the cognizance of civil authority.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ?
Well, if that's the case, then I expect they will take everything out of the government right down to prayer in public office and to recognition of the Christmas holiday, unless they want to recognize it as national "Winter Holiday". Not that the commercialism of Christmas resembles anything Christian anyways.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim
And that's the future...
|
"Prayer in public office" sounds like religious right code for civil authority over religion. Are you talking about genuine prayer by a civil magistrate, or a civil authority assuming jurisdiction over the people's prayers?
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|