Posts of banned users - Page 6 - Political Forum

Sebelius for VP, not Hillary · 05-13-2008, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bododie

LOL. Learn to read dear. I did answer the question. Please explain (traitorous).
I'm a traitor because I don't believe America is right all the time? That's not traitorous, that's better informed than you.

Cool personal attacks. 'gainst the forum rules though I'm afraid. You are banned.

WEB

NoMoreRepsDems · 05-14-2008, 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois

I'm not lying, you're lying. Ron Paul blames the US for 9/11:

Blaming The US's policies as reasons for terrorist to "WANT" to attack us IS NOT
saying AMERICANS ARE TERRORIST!!!!!!
That is the conclusion you want believe!!!!
It is false thus a lie!

Quote:

Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois

"They attacked us because we're over there." We shouldn't have been "over there" according to Ron Paul, ergo it is our fault that we got attacked on 9/11.

"ERGO" He did not call AMERICANS Terrorist!!!!!!..........
And by simple logic he is right/truthful. "IF" we were not over there they
would most likely not have attacked us!!!
Mexico was not over there, did the terrorist attack Mexico?

And did the terrorist in fact say that the motivation for 911 was because
America was in Iraq ? Because that is EXACTLY WHAT R PAUL said!!!!
NOT that "AMERICANS ARE TERRORIST"!!!!

Turkish Weekly Comment - 9/11 Terrorism, Motivation and Learning
September 11, 2001 attacks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
They are not slam dunk defences,but they do lean toward what Paul had
said.

Sebelius for VP, not Hillary · 05-14-2008, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoMoreRepsDems

Blaming The US's policies as reasons for terrorist to "WANT" to attack us IS NOT
saying AMERICANS ARE TERRORIST!!!!!!

That's exactly what it's saying. Ron Paul is not giving "reasons" why they attacked us. Ron Paul chooses a side. He says we are WRONG for being "over there". They attacked us for our WRONG action. Therefore, they (the terrorists) are right, and we are wrong, according to Paul. Paul blames the US for 9/11.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoMoreRepsDems

That is the conclusion you want believe!!!!

Again, it is against forum rules to tell people what they want. You don't tell me what I want. You don't know what I want, so you don't get to say what I want. You leave what I want, up to me, to tell you.

WEB

NoMoreRepsDems · 05-14-2008, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois

That's exactly what it's saying. Ron Paul is not giving "reasons" why they attacked us.

Did you watch that video link you posted?
Ron Paul gave a reason(s), I think you even repeated R.Paul's reasons(look at
your statement below you did repeat Paul's reasons, funny how that works).
It was "because America was in Iraq for 10yrs..."!!
So what exactly do you mean when you say :
"Ron Paul is not giving "reasons" why they attacked us."

Quote:

Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois

Ron Paul chooses a side. He says we are WRONG for being "over there". They attacked us for our WRONG action. Therefore, they (the terrorists) are right, and we are wrong, according to Paul. Paul blames the US for 9/11.
WEB.

So you're mad at Paul because he thinks there is a better way for America
to involve itself (or not) thru out the Middle East?
(I thinks he's right!)

If America was not run by big oil types (Bush Cheney and friends) America could have converted to Non-fossil fuel alternatives and eventually have NO
Vested interests in volatile terrorist supporting countries!
You do realize that by the US sending Billions of dollars to Middle East
Countries everyday (For Oil) we are indirectly financing the terrorist!!!
OBL got his Money from Oil (his dad work for an Oil tycoon).

Sebelius for VP, not Hillary · 05-15-2008, 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoMoreRepsDems

Did you watch that video link you posted?
Ron Paul gave a reason(s), I think you even repeated R.Paul's reasons(look at
your statement below you did repeat Paul's reasons, funny how that works).
It was "because America was in Iraq for 10yrs..."!!
So what exactly do you mean when you say :
"Ron Paul is not giving "reasons" why they attacked us."

So you're mad at Paul because he thinks there is a better way for America
to involve itself (or not) thru out the Middle East?
(I thinks he's right!)

If America was not run by big oil types (Bush Cheney and friends) America could have converted to Non-fossil fuel alternatives and eventually have NO
Vested interests in volatile terrorist supporting countries!
You do realize that by the US sending Billions of dollars to Middle East
Countries everyday (For Oil) we are indirectly financing the terrorist!!!
OBL got his Money from Oil (his dad work for an Oil tycoon).

You are permanently banned for low quality posting.

You said:

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoMoreRepsDems

Did you watch that video link you posted?
....

So you're mad at Paul because he thinks there is a better way for America
to involve itself (or not) thru out the Middle East?
(I thinks he's right!)

I have already posted that video link for you two or three times. It's just dumb to ask me if I watched the video that I repeatedly showed to you. Secondly, I asked you to stop talking about me (i.e. "you're mad"). Also, to say that I am mad at Paul "because he thinks there is a better way for America to involve itself (or not) thru out the Middle East" is a sheer misrepresentation of my argument: namely that Ron Paul is a traitor.

Most political viewpoints are welcome here (except for people encouraging terrorism and Holocaust deniers) however, we do have quality standards, which your posts do not meet. Thus, the reason for this banning.

WEB

Tim · 07-16-2008, 10:22 AM

This thread was very interesting for a long time, but the last half dozen posts have turned it into something else.

Too bad - it's a good topic.

iTaliAN_ICe · 07-16-2008, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim

This thread was very interesting for a long time, but the last half dozen posts have turned it into something else.

Too bad - it's a good topic.

See my previous post.

Tim · 07-16-2008, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iTaliAN_ICe

See my previous post.

Actually, I saw several of your previous posts - but you are a moderator and I know my place.

iTaliAN_ICe · 07-16-2008, 10:46 AM

I believe stopping now would be in your best interests. You don't want to head down a dangerous road, do you?

Tim · 07-16-2008, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iTaliAN_ICe

I believe stopping now would be in your best interests. You don't want to head down a dangerous road, do you?

You mean disagreement with a moderator is forbidden? The quality of your last few posts was very poor. Live with it.

A dangerous road? You are a forum moderator. Not the police. Don't bother to make threats. Learn how to behave yourself and speak to people with respect. And

Don't bother banning me. I am leaving.