Twin Towers Explosives Theory - Political Forum

CHUQ · 12-16-2006, 07:53 AM

The conspiracy theory that the World Trade Centre towers were demolished by explosive charges previously placed within them is probably impossible.

Any demolitions expert concocting a plan to hit a tall building with a plane and then use pre-placed explosives to ensure the undetectable collapse of the building would never place the explosives 20, 30 and 60 floors below the impact point. He would put them on one or more floors as close as possible to the planned impact level.

Just thought it nwould be a good poece.

Conspiracy disproved, by Alexander Cockburn

Tumbleweed · 12-16-2006, 09:09 AM

I'd say a fully fueled plane was enough to do the trick.

CHUQ · 12-16-2006, 09:50 AM

True that! I had either heard or read this theory recently and tought I would see what others thought.

echos · 02-12-2007, 09:46 AM

The theory is plauseable, but not realalistic. The fully fuled planes did it , I am sure.

choclosteve · 03-02-2007, 04:52 PM

There are folks saying that jet fuel burns at too low a temperature. Well if they knew about how a blacksmith's forge works by forcing enough air against wood, charcoal or coal to set steel on fire, and that building was a giant chimney that must have set up an incredible draft- wow, that must have gotten VERY hot. A blacksmith must be very careful not to get his steel too hot, or it goes off like a sparkler and is ruined. He wants it only red hot and soft. In my carpentry book there is a picture of a steel I beam drooped over a charred but straight wooden glue lam beam.

Troianii · 03-02-2007, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHUQ

The conspiracy theory that the World Trade Centre towers were demolished by explosive charges previously placed within them is probably impossible.

Any demolitions expert concocting a plan to hit a tall building with a plane and then use pre-placed explosives to ensure the undetectable collapse of the building would never place the explosives 20, 30 and 60 floors below the impact point. He would put them on one or more floors as close as possible to the planned impact level.

Just thought it nwould be a good poece.

Conspiracy disproved, by Alexander Cockburn

I'm more than a little tired of hearing this bullcrap about the U.S. government setting it up, it's a conspiracy with absolutely no credible evidence to support it.

But an interesting thought is that they tried blowing it up with explosives before.

CHUQ · 03-08-2007, 05:14 AM

The stop reading it!

top gun · 03-12-2007, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHUQ

The conspiracy theory that the World Trade Centre towers were demolished by explosive charges previously placed within them is probably impossible.

Any demolitions expert concocting a plan to hit a tall building with a plane and then use pre-placed explosives to ensure the undetectable collapse of the building would never place the explosives 20, 30 and 60 floors below the impact point. He would put them on one or more floors as close as possible to the planned impact level.

Just thought it nwould be a good poece.

Conspiracy disproved, by Alexander Cockburn

Not only is the evidence and the people on the ground enough to believe it happened as reported that day but the theories on demolitions or our own government doing it just makes no sense. If we wanted to do something to start a war there is about a gazillion things our governnment could set up that would do the trick and not kill all those innocent people. I don't like Bush at all... but he's not a maniac.

CHUQ · 03-18-2007, 05:58 PM

First of all let me say I started this thread just to see if anyone was intersted in the theory. Do I believe? Probably not, but let us say that if you want more money for your bang, deaths are a way to get it. Hopefully, that is not the case.

One · 03-19-2007, 08:09 AM

Theres a lot more to this story than any of us will ever know, trust me on this.
One thing is a fact- we are being witheld information and there has not been an independent investigation. Something is fishy, so lets not jump to conclusions.