Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 08-27-2007, 08:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
Mercenary
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Prague
Posts: 298
Country:
Cool Washington and Diplomatic Recognition of Bosnia

HOW WASHINGTON SET BH ON FIRE :
Although Washington initially did not interfere with the YU conflict leaving the EU with free hands ,it didn´t mean that the Bush and Clinton administrations were prepared to keep back if the Europeans seemed to jeopardize the key role of the US in Europe ...
The breakaway of the Slovenia and Croatia was accompanied by considerable violence though the YU constitution permitted the secession if all the constitutional nations agreed to it - Croatia evaded the constitutional provision by stripping the Croatian Serbs of the status of a constitutional nation and forced them to SIGN an oath of loyalty to Croatia ...
The EU from habit was idly countenance the violence having words whether to recognize Slovenia and Croatia or not ... The then UN GS Perez de Cuellar, former US SS Cyrus Vance and the EU negotiator Lord Peter Carrington werw warning against an immediate recognition not to cut off all hope of reconciliation, only Helmut Kohl ( Croatia has always been an ally of G. and a beloved summer place of many Germans recollecting the golden WWII times ) insisted on their immediate recognition and succeeded in persuading the others - this was the crucial moment : 6.2.92 the Bush Senior government being under heavy pressure on the part of its Saudi Arabian "business partners" , including the bin Ladin family, which asked for a Muslim state in Europe (however,Ryad underestimated the traditional influence of Teheran in Bosnia ) , made an exchange deal with the EU :
Washington will recognize Slovenia and Croation in exchange for the recognition of the Bosnia- Hercegovina governed by the Muslims , the dominance of the Muslims being the Washington´s primary end (!) which explains the aggressive propaganda campaign in favour of Izetbegovic that falsely made the Serbs aggressors ( even the start of the ethnic war the Sarajevo government had perfectly planned by not punishing the publicly known murders from the ill-famous Muslim-Croatian mafia gang which shot the father of the bride at a Serbian wedding on March 1.92, as I wrote then it was the Croatian army that crossed the Sava River in the northern Bosnia, burnt down the Serbian village Sijekovac nearby Bosenski Brod and murdered all its villagers ) the genocide perpetrators and the only culprits at the Hague Tribunal dock (both Tudjman and Izetbegovic had died in the proper time , in the same mysterious way as Milosevic ) and within framework of which the sacrifice of Srebrenica was being prepared well in advance ...)
Washington insisted on the recognition of Bosnia with the Muslim political domonance in spite of the fact that the BMuslims "owned" only 40% of the Bosnian land (!) , and in defiance of all the warnings coming from all the both European and US intelligence services that if the Bosnia gets an international recognition, it will immediately explode which happened within a fortnight ...
The EU diplomats knew only well the explosibility of the situation in BH and therefore Lord Carrington and Portuguese ministry of Foreign Affaairs José Cutillero tried to soften the impacts of the d.recognition by negotiating the Lisabon Agreements on March 29,92 which constituted three "helvetian" semiautonomous ethnic cantons under the government of the central Sarajevo government which had been signed by all the three ethnics and also Beograd agreed to it , however, two days later the Americal ambassador to YU Warren Zimmerman persuaded Izetbegovic to withdraw his signature from the agreements (!) Roger Cohen wrote in the New York Times that by recognizing BH under Washington´s pressure it was Washington who set the BH on fire ...
Washington, under the pressure of its economic interests in the Middle East, while pretending to be an impartial negotiator and pretending to wish a multiethnic BH, was aggressively favouring the Bosnian Muslims and deliberately thwarted all the European and UN peace plans (the above-mentioned Lisabon A., late92 Vance-Owen plan, or Owen-Stoltenberg plan of 93 ) All these peace plans Milosevic accepted ... The EU negotiator David Owen in his book Balkan Odyssey wrote : "From the spring 93 till the summer 95 all what Washington did was the deliberate protraction of the Bosnia war ..." Gen. Charles Boyd,the former Deputy Chief Commander of the NATO troops in Europe and as lata as the end of the Bosnia war the chief of the NATO intelligence service in the mag. Foreign Affairs declared :" Washington is doing its utmost to influence the Bosnia war for the political gains of the Muslims ..."
factfinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right