Terrible T. Rex Was a Slowpoke LiveScience Staff


T. rex was no slacker. But the popular image of a nimble predator turning on a dime and chasing down prey with lightning speed is fiction, new computer models show. The terrifying tyrannosaur was actually a slowpoke.


Previous studies have looked at the movements of birds, the direct descendents of dinosaurs, and fossilized footprints to judge how Tyrannosaurus rex would have moved.

To get a better estimate of the giant’s movement, the new study modeled a typical complete T. rex skeleton, which probably weighed between about 13,000 and 17,000 pounds, and estimated its center of mass and the inertia, or resistance to movement, that it would have had when the animal turned or pivoted.


The center of mass is important to consider because two animals with similar weights may move in different ways depending on how their mass is distributed. For example, an elephant’s four tree trunk-like legs keep its center of mass over its feet, while T. rex would have had to balance its mass differently over its two small legs, bending them to keep from toppling over.


The model results, detailed in the June 21 issue of the Journal of Theoretical Biology, also showed that T. rex would have had considerable inertia preventing it from turning quickly; a 45-degree turn would have taken one or two seconds—far longer than for a human.


These calculations lend further support to previous research indicating that the large tyrannosaurs could run no faster than 25 mph (and certainly not the 45 mph seen in some movies), because its leg muscles weren’t big enough for fast running.


“We now know that a T. rex would have been front heavy, turned slowly and could manage no more than a leisurely jog,” said team leader John Hutchinson of the Royal Veterinary College.

Images: Dinosaur Art
Animations Reveal How Dinosaurs Might Have Walked
Images: Dinosaur Fossils
Original Story: Terrible T. Rex Was a Slowpoke

Visit LiveScience.com for more daily news, views and scientific inquiry with an original, provocative point of view. LiveScience reports amazing, real world breakthroughs, made simple and stimulating for people on the go. Check out our collection of Science, Animal and Dinosaur Pictures, Science Videos, Hot Topics, Trivia, Top 10s, Voting, Amazing Images, Reader Favorites, and more. Get cool gadgets at the new LiveScience Store, sign up for our free daily email newsletter and check out our RSS feeds today!

Scientists can prove nothing. It is not in the realm of science to prove anything.

__________________
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
— Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love

I'd say 25 mph is about right.

Can you prove that for me?

__________________

There has been an ongoing debate by scientists if T-Rex was a predator or scavenger. They claim that T-Rex was ill-equipped to kill animals of great size.
Observing my chickens, which are shaped remarkably like a T-Rex, how they move and how they hunt insects, I have envisioned another scenario.
They may have specialized in hunting animals much smaller than themselves. Chickens are very well adapted for rotating at the hip and quickly seizing prey on the ground. Is it possible that T-Rex hunted through brush grabbing small prey like a chicken?
Scientists claim the area of his brain that enables scenting prey was very large compared to other animals. This seems to support my hypothesis.

Intriguing. That’s an interesting approach.

__________________