Why would you want to close your embassies? That would be highly counter-productive and would probably even do some severe damage to trade relations.

__________________

The Shah was a dictator, not so cruel as Khomeini but he was a dictator installed by the US after the CIA overthrowed Mossadegh. Then the US brought Khomeini into Iran, and now we have to get along with Ahmadinejad. And the US is complaining about Iran and Ahmadinejad? Absurd. The US should start to complain about its own policy one day.
The Islamic revolution happened because of the Shah. The Shah was a dictator, financed and supported by the West. The West supported the oppression of Iranians and the Iranians got angry one day, the US brought Khomeini into Iran and the revolution has happened.

Yeah, it proves that the NATO is a bunch of war criminals.

If you want peace prepare for peace, if you want war you will get war.

Why do you want to close embassies?

And this makes sense in what way? The arm industry will have its fun, at least its money.

Ahmadinejad said this also.

Diplomacy is the most important kind of politics.

Do you want to drop an atom bomb?

You don't care if thousands of innocents have to die? This is no "process", it is massmurder.

Uh, normally it is the West that "has to" interfere. It would interest me how you would talk about war, if you would be affected by it.

I would agree, you don't close your embassies but we should withdraw our military forces and only have embassies in nations where the People of those nations want our embassies. You shouldn't have to build a billion dollar fortress and provide 70,000 troops (endorsed by Clinton, Obama, and McCain) to secure an embassy in any nation. If the People of a nation don't want you in their country you should get the fuck out. An embassy is not required for diplomatic relations.

the whole world already knows tyrant when it sees one and surly you would fall

so who the fuck is really got weapons of mass destruction??? rock throwers or you

Your going to close your embassies and want to peacfully co- exist as trading partners after youve admitted that you have weapons of mass destruction bombed and killed innocents for what our oil? You came and stole it with your weapons you never wanted peace you just wanted peice of the oil pie hell you took the whole cake

you forget that in your own country their are muslims and yes that one action will spark a never ending war against your government you and your party will quickly be killed and the holy sites will be built back up but you will never be in power again


In case you havent been paying attention this is happing now the troops are only for more ground support

who the fuck went into iraq first???? who killed millions of people innocent people?? youve turned it into a ash tray already hell its your toliet bowl you can shit on it when ever you want because it has no defence system you are a real bully and history will record you as such, if you are so worried about weapons of mass destruction then go over to south korea or china why dont you fuck with them why ? because they will put a really good fight your actions is like a cowardly boxer who is a heavy weight and wants to fight featherweights and brags about knocking them out but once you have the opportunite to fight someone in your own weight class you turn chicken shit

Some people believe that the US can somehow magically bring the Iraqis together to peacefully work toward a politicial solution by just hanging around a little longer, while IMO that is fallacy.

Kofi Annan himself stated that the invasion of Iraq "was not in conformity with the U.N. charter. From our point of view, from the charter point of view, it was illegal." which should be a clear indication that the US gives a shit about international law which includs the Geneva convention, which is only exacerbated by obvious affronts to it such as Guantanamo.

__________________

agreed i believe to let the Iraqis work it out themselves the usa is always fucking with other countries, Let these people set up their own government leave them alone.However if the democrat presedent was to pull out he would have already established a heavy USA presence in Iraq, the president of Iraq would be some one who the US would have put into that position. Like Saadam it would just be another one and if he or she disagrees with the us then they would most surly go in and kill again.The bankers must make their money!!!

I believe that nomatter what government is put into place with American help, it will be overthrown eventually. So we might just as well make that progression towards Iraqis self-determining their fate again as swift as possible by leaving already.

__________________

I say we pull out, leave them to it, wait for one side to win, declare their new leader a dictator, invade them and start the whole thing again.

The best exit strategy is a good entrance strategy.

Haha, loving it It sucks for the Iraqi people for sure, but for the rest of the world it would probably be the cheapest way...you'r right.

__________________

Aye thanks

Thing is, no matter what happens, its gonna suck for the iraqis, theres just different levels of suckness.

I learnt that from a hooker in amsterdam.