Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 05-05-2008, 10:33 PM   #11 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
Country:
O_o

I hate it when they bring up stupid crap like this...
The ESRB ratings are fine as they are, its the parents fault if they dont preview a "M" game before they give it to their kids...even if they look at screenshots fotr this game they will know its violent...its then thier decision to buy the game or not...
__________________
-Doccrobb
doccrobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 06:51 AM   #12 (permalink)
Squire
 
The Swiss 557's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Geneva
Posts: 102
Country:
Country:
People like Hillary Clinton and Jack Thompson throw everything that involves video games out of propertions, they claim that video games cause people to act violently when in fact it suppresses their violent intentions, I find their campaign against video games absurd because it is simply a form of entertainment, if they see it violent then they should have a campaign against TV, but I am not suggesting that they should campaign against any media.
The Swiss 557 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 10:14 AM   #13 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiveUninhibited View Post
The bill that required the ESRB to actually play the games they rated made sense to me. I do agree that it is the parents responsibility to regulate what their children do, but we can't expect them to know enough about video games to make an informed choice unless the ESRB is effective.

I started playing GTA IV recently. It's pretty fun, a great way to get out frustration. Anybody think video games actually help people by helping them get out their emotions or whatever without harming real people?
We certainly can expect a parent to know even better than the child what video games are acceptable. They may not know how to play them, but to suggest that a parent can't make an informed decision about the appropriateness of a video game without the ESRB's help is absurd. Sit down and play it with them! LEARN THE GAME! Family time, all that stuff that has been lost to the age of entertainment and micro-wave meals. If family was more common, then these problems would be less and less.

Also, playing a violent video game is not going to help you cope more. It's not the violent aspect that makes it help, it's the fact that you think it's fun. I think golfing is fun and that relaxes me and eases tension of the day. There's nothing violent (for the most part) about golf, it just helps you to forget when you're doing something you enjoy.
__________________
"Just 1 presidency Per Household PLZ!"

"Hold on ma'am, the abortion is almost complete. I just have to count and make sure I got all the finger's and toes out of there."

RAPE is not a good reason to MURDER an innocent being.
BratWurst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 01:33 PM   #14 (permalink)
Nicest Moderator
 
Izzibeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,719
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Izzibeth
Attacking video games is just a way for politicians to try to get "on the parents' side" without doing too much thinking.

This kind of thing won't last long though as our video game generation grows up. It just gets our grandparents generation all up in a tizzy because they don't know anything about video games (for the most part) and have no interest in learning. There has, as far as studies show, not been any link between video games and real life violence (other than tricking 18 year old boys into joining the military by letting them play free online FPSs where they shoot the bad guys and respawn when they die... just like in real life!). So it's just a quick way for politicians to try to get the parents' vote. That's all.

And yes... Manhunt2 is a fucked up game.
Izzibeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 12:03 PM   #15 (permalink)
Squire
 
The Swiss 557's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Geneva
Posts: 102
Country:
Country:
Hillary Clinton is wondering why she isn't getting ahead of Obama is because the video game voters have a hatred towards Hillary, I just hope she won't get elected because she will probably pass bills that will ban video games that are violent.
The Swiss 557 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 01:19 PM   #16 (permalink)
Nicest Moderator
 
Izzibeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,719
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Izzibeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Swiss 557 View Post
Hillary Clinton is wondering why she isn't getting ahead of Obama is because the video game voters have a hatred towards Hillary, I just hope she won't get elected because she will probably pass bills that will ban video games that are violent.
Even if she did manage to get that to work it wouldn't last long. My generation has grown up on video games and as we get older we would throw that isht out.
Izzibeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 01:21 PM   #17 (permalink)
Knight
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 514
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Swiss 557 View Post
Hillary Clinton is wondering why she isn't getting ahead of Obama is because the video game voters have a hatred towards Hillary, I just hope she won't get elected because she will probably pass bills that will ban video games that are violent.
Hillary's problems have nothing to do with video games. As far as I can tell she has not even brought the issue up upon starting her campaign. I she did though it would hurt her, but probably not by that much. Either way getting elected would not necessarily mean she would pass such a law. That would lead to disaster I can only imagine it.
__________________
Proof of media bias? A mistake by the major networks they don't want you to know about. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/media...als_04-24.html
nemesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right