Quote:
Originally Posted by dahermit
Not only do you offer no proof that people are waiting for the government to provide a solution to their weight problems, nor have you provided proof the people are relying on the government to solve their other problems.
|
The hypothesis is that people want the government to solve their weight problem. The premise that people are relying on their government refers to the masses, not you specifically. Of course, not everyone should be required to grow their own food and get a medical degree to heal their illnesses, but government hospitals, power, jobs, and food reduce competition and creates a virtual monopoly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahermit
Like most people without a formal education in statistics you are trying to equate correlation with causation. Just because there are a lot of government programs does not necessarily mean that (most, some, or all)people have come to rely on them. You can only prove that government programs exist.
|
Why are these agencies that waste billions of dollars of taxpayer money still in place if the people don't want them? Maybe you don't, and I most certainly don't want them, but I refuse to believe that it is a group of politicians that consistently misrepresent their constituents to keep these agencies flourishing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahermit
"Did you read that long post I bothered to put up? Or any of the links I took the time to find for you? This statement here still proves that obesity is a personal responsibility, as you yourself claim that they are failing to control it, while my evidence shows that the solution is diet and exercise." Now it is no longer your theory but has now been proven? Which is it? Theory or Fact?
|
ONCE AGAIN, my theory is not that obesity is a personal responsibility. My theory is that this personal responsibility is being given up to the government. Excellent job in dodging the point of that quote of mine and attacking the theory/fact aspect of it, though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahermit
That is why I asked for your age. There were markers in your post that suggested a youthful mind. (A marker associated with youth: A statement that he/she is here to learn, but all the posts are statements not questions.)
No matter how intelligent a 23 year old is or thinks he is, he cannot have the mass of knowledge acquired by years of formal education or a lifetime of observations.
|
I am learning as we debate right now. Just because I don't stop debating and say, "Oh, you are absolutely right, you've changed my worldview. I can't believe I've been wrong all these years", does not mean that I am not paying attention and carefully reading your posts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahermit
I suggest classes in logic and statistics, and about 30 years of experience applying those disciplines. But you will ignore this advice just as I would have ignored at age of 23...you are much like I was at your age. All problems were simple and I had all the obvious answers.
|
Funny that you would suggest classes in logic when you continue to bring up the age issue - a perfect example of chronological snobbery combined with ad hominem, designed to deflect attention from the argument to the fact that since I am younger and you are older, I must not be formally educated or have any idea what I'm talking about, and you have the experience necessary to make a qualified argument. Coincidentally, despite the fact that I have poured myself into debating the original argument (barring this post), your last post had exactly 3 sentences that adressed the actual debate, and 7 that attacked either my age or my alleged lack of formal education.
I'll concede that I do need to take classes in statistics. I've been meaning to study up on probability and statistics anyway, but this gives me a reason too, so thank you for that.
Frankly, the assumption that I would ignore the advice of an older more educated person offends me. I'm not some drunken frat boy, I'm a kid out of college who wants to try out what he's learned, and then learn from the mistakes he will make, as well as the advice given to him by people that have been around longer.
I'll give you the last word, then I'm going to have to end this debate, I don't want this to devolve into something ugly between us where we feel we couldn't possibly debate in the future. If I don't respond later, I truly have enjoyed this, dahermit, and please don't think that I did not learn anything from you. In fact, if you would be open to it, I noticed that one of your interests is string theory, and I have been trying to find someone knowledgeable enough to explain it to me in a less "textbook"-type of writing. Maybe we could open a thread for that somewhere?