Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 01-21-2008, 12:34 AM   #1 (permalink)
Earl
 
africanhope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Potchefstroom, South Africa
Posts: 1,559
Country:
Country:
Extending the Security Council

'An idea whose time has come': Brown backs UN security council seat for India | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics

I must say I agree with PM Brown, except on the whole Veto thing. I am not saying the 'new' nations should get the veto, I think no one should have it.

But alas, a more representative council is not something I think I will see in my lifetime.

AH
__________________
“The subject no longer has to be mentioned by name. Someone is sick. Someone else is feeling better now. A friend has just gone back into the hospital. Another has died. The unspoken name, of course, is AIDS.”
“From the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry, the AIDS problem has already been solved. After all, we already have a drug which can be sold at the incredible price of $8, 000 an annual dose, and which has the added virtue of not diminishing the market by actually curing anyone.”

africanhope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 03:09 AM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 78
Country:
Country:
i guess its ok if india joins the council, but they should bring some thing to the table, or at least make a larger military so the US doesnt have to go and fight every 1.
Pawn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 04:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
Earl
 
africanhope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Potchefstroom, South Africa
Posts: 1,559
Country:
Country:
Well, okay, but when last did America send the military in to fight, on request of the UN, (as opposed to against UN decisions?)

Many countries contribute to UN missions accross the world, including India, so I do not see this being a pre requsit

AH
__________________
“The subject no longer has to be mentioned by name. Someone is sick. Someone else is feeling better now. A friend has just gone back into the hospital. Another has died. The unspoken name, of course, is AIDS.”
“From the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry, the AIDS problem has already been solved. After all, we already have a drug which can be sold at the incredible price of $8, 000 an annual dose, and which has the added virtue of not diminishing the market by actually curing anyone.”

africanhope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 05:09 AM   #4 (permalink)
Earl
 
AzTeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 1,534
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanhope View Post
I must say I agree with PM Brown, except on the whole Veto thing. I am not saying the 'new' nations should get the veto, I think no one should have it.
Agreed. The whole Veto-thing is a sad joke if you ask me. It's important there is a strong mechanism to ensure nothing is done because a couple want it to be done, but only one opposing something being enough to crush an entire resolution is wrong. 4/5 should be for sanctions/whatever in order for them to pass, but a 100% concordance of all permanent security council members has prooven to just turn the UN into sitting duck unable to act.
__________________
AzTeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 07:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Viceroy
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 3,083
Country:
Country:
Interesting. It's not just India they're supporting, but also Brazil, Japan, Germany and one African country (which I should think will probably be South Africa). And none of them will get a Veto. Which means their permanent seat gives them some benefit, but not massively.
I like his idea to have a civilian peace-keeping organisation to help countries that come out of conflicts. I guess he got the idea from Iraq.
I'm not too keen on the stuff at the end of the article though. Giving the IMF greater over-sight powers and the World Bank money for the environment sounds like a good idea, but neither are institutions that have been particularly competent over the last couple of decades.
__________________
... I am surprised at your insolence in writing to me at all. You know, as I know, that I bought this constituency... may God's curse light upon you and may it make your women as open and as free to the excise officers as your wives and daughters have always been to me while I have represented your scoundrel corporation.
I have the honour to be... your obliged humble servant, Anthony Henley
- MPs reply to constituent, mid 1700s
Brother Oz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 08:15 AM   #6 (permalink)
Mercenary
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA!
Posts: 378
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanhope View Post
'An idea whose time has come': Brown backs UN security council seat for India | Special Reports | Guardian Unlimited Politics

I must say I agree with PM Brown, except on the whole Veto thing. I am not saying the 'new' nations should get the veto, I think no one should have it.

But alas, a more representative council is not something I think I will see in my lifetime.

AH
If they ever get rid of the Veto then the UN takes a major step toward being a world goverment IMO.

At that point the US should immediately withdraw and demand the UN move it's offices from the US.
Calvin-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 08:21 AM   #7 (permalink)
Mercenary
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA!
Posts: 378
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother Oz View Post
Interesting. It's not just India they're supporting, but also Brazil, Japan, Germany and one African country (which I should think will probably be South Africa). And none of them will get a Veto. Which means their permanent seat gives them some benefit, but not massively.
I like his idea to have a civilian peace-keeping organisation to help countries that come out of conflicts. I guess he got the idea from Iraq.
I'm not too keen on the stuff at the end of the article though. Giving the IMF greater over-sight powers and the World Bank money for the environment sounds like a good idea, but neither are institutions that have been particularly competent over the last couple of decades.

Both India and Germany makes sense. Brazil still seems more of a regional power than global. Japan? With it's demographics?

And South Africa? Has it had a peaceful transition of power yet? That is alway the big test.
Calvin-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 08:42 AM   #8 (permalink)
Governor General
 
Goldstone69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 749
Country:
Country:
Perhaps the UK and France should give up there seats on the Council .......a new EU seat can take there place ?
__________________
"One must never forget that monetary union, which the two of us were the first to propose more than a decade ago is ultimately a political project. It aims to give a new impulse to the historic movement towards union of the European states. Monetary union is a federative project that needs to be accompanied and followed by other steps." — Giscard d'Estaing and Helmut Schmidt
Goldstone69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 09:26 AM   #9 (permalink)
Mercenary
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA!
Posts: 378
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldstone69 View Post
Perhaps the UK and France should give up there seats on the Council .......a new EU seat can take there place ?

Not quite yet, I would say...


List of countries by GDP (nominal) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
Country GDP (millions of USD)
— Gross world product 48,245,198
— European Union 14,609,836
1 United States 13,194,700
2 Japan 4,366,459
3 Germany 2,915,867
4 People's Republic of China 2,644,642 2
5 United Kingdom 2,398,946
6 France 2,252,213
7 Italy 1,852,585
8 Canada 1,275,273
9 Spain 1,225,750
10 Brazil 1,067,706
11 Russia 984,925
12 South Korea 888,267
13 India 873,659
14 Mexico 840,012
15 Australia 755,659 1
16 Netherlands 670,929
17 Turkey

I would say the UK and France have not yet declined (relatively ) to the point where that would be reasonable.
Calvin-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 05:17 PM   #10 (permalink)
Conscript
 
العرب قادمون's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 32
Country:
Country:
Nominate Saudi Arabia and Egypt to take a seat in the Security Council ..... I think that giving any country veto is the wrong decision ... That is not reasonable that a single failure of any decision opposed interests.
العرب قادمون is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right