Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 10-16-2007, 01:00 AM   #11 (permalink)
Governor General
 
colourislast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 757
Country:
Country:
oil shortage

Along with the false notion of man made global warming is the odd hypothesis of us coming close to the end of our supply of oil. Do you realize that has been going around ever since we found a use for that goo? There is more crude oil pumped into the oceans from cracks in the ocean floor than is used in the U.S.! That is a BUNCH of oil. The only issue is getting to it. Mexico, China and other countries NOT binding themselves up with man made global warming hooey are out there exploring and getting more every day. While we hamstring ourselves into no drilling or new refineries. Why? Why STOP using oil? Go to electric cars they say. Hey Jimbo, how you gunna insulate all those wires? Can't use oil to make plastic! Mud don't work so well for the lightweight body panels either. If you say it is okay to refine oil to make plastic, what are you going to do with that explosive by product?
colourislast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2007, 12:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
Earl
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,755
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast View Post
Along with the false notion of man made global warming is the odd hypothesis of us coming close to the end of our supply of oil. Do you realize that has been going around ever since we found a use for that goo? There is more crude oil pumped into the oceans from cracks in the ocean floor than is used in the U.S.! That is a BUNCH of oil. The only issue is getting to it. Mexico, China and other countries NOT binding themselves up with man made global warming hooey are out there exploring and getting more every day. While we hamstring ourselves into no drilling or new refineries. Why? Why STOP using oil? Go to electric cars they say. Hey Jimbo, how you gunna insulate all those wires? Can't use oil to make plastic! Mud don't work so well for the lightweight body panels either. If you say it is okay to refine oil to make plastic, what are you going to do with that explosive by product?
We're not saying you can't use any oil ever again, but limiting the use of oil. We're replacing it where we can.
Oregon Elephant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2007, 01:50 PM   #13 (permalink)
Conscript
 
paincake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 21
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast View Post
Along with the false notion of man made global warming is the odd hypothesis of us coming close to the end of our supply of oil. Do you realize that has been going around ever since we found a use for that goo? There is more crude oil pumped into the oceans from cracks in the ocean floor than is used in the U.S.! That is a BUNCH of oil. The only issue is getting to it.
Actually I don't think it's been around since the beginning of using it. "Peak Oil" theories surfaced I believe in the mid-century. Who originally came up with such theories? The oil companies. They didn't publicize it because it would show a limitation, however their interest in that product made them look at it ways no one else was.
To say that there is no end of supply of a product is just silliness. We could argue WHEN that end is but we all know it can't be limitless. We know this because we know how it was made. Right?

Quote:
Mexico, China and other countries NOT binding themselves up with man made global warming hooey are out there exploring and getting more every day. While we hamstring ourselves into no drilling or new refineries. Why? Why STOP using oil? Go to electric cars they say. Hey Jimbo, how you gunna insulate all those wires? Can't use oil to make plastic! Mud don't work so well for the lightweight body panels either. If you say it is okay to refine oil to make plastic, what are you going to do with that explosive by product?
There are lots of reasons why even if you don't subscribe to "man made global warming hooey". You named a couple of them with the fact that China and Mexico are drilling it and dependent on it. China is ENORMOUS and their rate of consumption is growing. It's a pit. When that supply runs out if we're ALL dependent on oil we'll ALL lose and it will be a disaster unparalleled. IF we're already off and running in new directions its just that much ahead we'll be and that much less tragedy averted. Forward thinking is tough but we do have things called investors. Hopefully they'll see the gold at the end of the tunnel. It's not a matter of "if" but "when".
__________________
paincake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 09:36 AM   #14 (permalink)
Knight
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 637
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast View Post
Why STOP using oil?
Putting aside climate change arguments, there are strong geopolitical reasons for reducing dependency on oil. According to the December 18, 2006 issue of Oil & Gas Journal, the following countries hold 54% of the world's proved oil reserves: Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates. If one adds the proved oil reserves of Russia and Venezuela to the mix, that figure rises to 65% of the world's proved oil reserves.

The Middle East has been geopolitically unstable for decades. The rise in the price of crude oil from around $80/barrel to more than $87/barrel on account of concerns of a Turkish military incursion into northern Iraq highlights the impact geopolitical risks can have. Most analysts have estimated that a war with Iran would cause prices to spike to $120/barrel - $160/barrel.

Venezuela is increasingly hostile toward the U.S. The U.S.-Russia bilateral relationship is continuing to erode. Dependency on oil is creating genuine economic and geopolitical vulnerability for the U.S. and its allies.
donsutherland1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2007, 06:13 PM   #15 (permalink)
Baron
 
Wheeldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,060
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessGovMrPrez View Post
Climate change is always happening. We as a species cannot stop it, nor can we create it. The very fact we ahve gone from calling it global cooling, to global warming, to now climate change shows how much of a load of crap this issue is.
You are correct in re: to the dynamic of natural climate change. However, the present situation far exceeds "normal" when it comes to the scope and pace of climate change. I am a firm believer in the basics of cause and effect. Burning billions of tons of oil, coal and natural gas releases millions of years of CO2 and methane accumulation. There is no credible scientific argument that these gasses contribute to the retention of solar heat reaching our planet. We can and are having a direct and measurable impact on the world's climate.
Wheeldog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 04:49 PM   #16 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessGovMrPrez View Post
Climate change is always happening. We as a species cannot stop it, nor can we create it. The very fact we ahve gone from calling it global cooling, to global warming, to now climate change shows how much of a load of crap this issue is..
The theory of global cooling that arose in the 70s was never accepted by the scientific community. There were some papers written about the hypothesis, and it was taken up by the scientifically ignorant mass media, but it was never something taken too seriously by climate scientists. To compare it to global warming is completely misleading.
farside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 11:30 PM   #17 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,259
Pendulum

Quote:
Originally Posted by farside View Post
The theory of global cooling that arose in the 70s was never accepted by the scientific community. There were some papers written about the hypothesis, and it was taken up by the scientifically ignorant mass media, but it was never something taken too seriously by climate scientists. To compare it to global warming is completely misleading.
Most of earths 'heat' is trapped in the first ten thousand feet of atmosphere. Heat is actually distributed and carried away by large structures in earths atmosphere called "Convection Cells". The temperature of the lower atmosphere would be affected by the flow rates/ velocities, within the convection cells. Higher heat in the main convection zones means a more rapid flow...means a more rapid transport of heat from the surface. Perhaps we will get a bit more motivated when, with surprising speed, it begins to snow, heavily and regularly. Mankind will be moved.
vladward8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2007, 11:33 PM   #18 (permalink)
Mercenary
 
texas_tank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 274
Country:
Send a message via AIM to texas_tank
we couldnt economically stop using oil.. thats impossible..

what we need to use is offer lots of different methods of fuel, such as flex, ethanol, electricity, bio diesel, vegitable oil.. etc.
__________________
"We're kicking ass." -George W. Bush
texas_tank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 11:37 AM   #19 (permalink)
Earl
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,755
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by texas_tank View Post
we couldnt economically stop using oil.. thats impossible..

what we need to use is offer lots of different methods of fuel, such as flex, ethanol, electricity, bio diesel, vegitable oil.. etc.
We're talking about using less oil, say using other means to generate electricity. In turn that would make oil cheaper for all the other uses.
Oregon Elephant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2007, 12:07 PM   #20 (permalink)
Earl
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,755
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainMike View Post
We need to develop biofuel from algae as fast as possible. I posted an article in the Environment forum about this breakthrough. Whereas harvest of corn or sugarcane is one a year and requires huge amounts of land, algae biofuel due to its super fast rate of growth is harvest daily and required very little space. It takes in carbon dioxide and its waste product from biofuel production is oxygen.

This could at least give us a couple of decades to develop other alternatives such as hydrogen.

I'm sure there were people back in 1910 that said the automobile was the devil's own invention and we should never give up the horse.
You are dead set on algae biofuel, aren't you?
Oregon Elephant is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right