Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 08-05-2007, 11:59 AM   #1 (permalink)
Reeve
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: With Elvis in a underground Rock house (he's still kicking it!)
Posts: 83
Country:
USA Takes over.

This is truely bloody absurd.
Quote:
BBC news

writer unknown

Congress backs foreign wiretaps

President Bush welcomed the vote
Congress in the US has backed a measure allowing the government to eavesdrop on foreigners suspected of having links with terrorism.
The House of Representatives approved the bill by a majority of 44 after its approval in the Senate, with the Democratic majority split on the issue.

The bill allows taps on foreign phone and internet communications routed via the US, without prior court approval.

President George Bush says the measure is needed to combat terrorist threats.

The House voted late on Saturday 227-183 in favour of the bill, which updates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

"Unprecedented measure"

When the new measures come into force, the government will have the right to intercept, without warrants, communications between foreigners that are routed through equipment in the US, provided that "foreign intelligence information" is at stake.

In his first reaction, Mr Bush hailed the vote in the House, which is dominated by opposition Democrats.


This bill would grant the attorney general the ability to wiretap anybody, any place, any time without court review

Democratic Rep Zoe Lofgren

"The Director of National Intelligence, Mike McConnell, has assured me that this bill gives him what he needs to continue to protect the country, and therefore I will sign this legislation as soon as it gets to my desk," he said.

But many House Democrats expressed strong reservations about the bill, saying it infringed constitutional rights.

"This bill would grant the attorney general the ability to wiretap anybody, any place, any time without court review, without any checks and balances," said Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren during the debate preceding the vote.

"I think this unwarranted, unprecedented measure would simply eviscerate the 4th Amendment" of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures.

The administration introduced changes to the law after a recent ruling by the FISA court.

That decision barred the government from eavesdropping without warrants on foreign suspects whose messages were being routed through US communications carriers, including internet sites.
O The U.S. is going to get nuked now.. They have no right in any since to be able to make foreign desisions like that.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 06:47 PM   #2 (permalink)
Reeve
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: With Elvis in a underground Rock house (he's still kicking it!)
Posts: 83
Country:
Im glad no one else thinks this is a bad thing that the United states can now completely break the 4th admenment and can wiretap every fone in the world with out and real reason and with out warrent. hmm
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 07:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Icefear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 28
Country:
I don't really think that this bill is all that necessary. I agree it could help stop terrorism but it also violates the rights of millions of people. I think it should have restrictions, rather than just free access without any reprisal. I would need more information on the specifics of the bill before I gave an opinion. There was something on the news about it a while back but I hadn't really thought about it like this...
Icefear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 10:09 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
iTaliAN_ICe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,653
Country:
Country:
Wiretap all the foreigners you want, I don't care. Foreigners aren't protected by the US Constitution... they have no 4th amendment rights. The US government can wiretap to it's heart's content as long as it doesn't do so to it's own citizens without a warrant.
iTaliAN_ICe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 10:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
Marquis
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,170
But the problem is, as usual, who is going to oversee this program? I don't think the Administration has a lot of respect for the FISA court.
__________________
Not a day goes by that I don't see something that reinforces my belief that people are idiots.
Scribbler1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 11:31 PM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 619
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Im glad no one else thinks this is a bad thing that the United states can now completely break the 4th admenment and can wiretap every fone in the world with out and real reason and with out warrent. hmm
Although I agree with Italian Ice, foreigners have no rights under our constitution....welcome to the New World Order!
apawllo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 12:04 AM   #7 (permalink)
Hermes' Bird Moderator
 
Kazikli Bey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Amestris
Posts: 2,860
Country:
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Kazikli Bey Send a message via MSN to Kazikli Bey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Im glad no one else thinks this is a bad thing that the United states can now completely break the 4th admenment and can wiretap every fone in the world with out and real reason and with out warrent. hmm
Hopefully they eventually do that to the 2nd amendment, completely take those rights away. And america calls itself the land of the free!!!
__________________
I hear people saying how they are going to fight in the Revolution, how they're goin' to die for the Revolution. You know what, I never hear anybody say how they're gonna kill for the Revolution. You know what I say? I say 'Fuck the Revolution'.

The BEST comic ever!!!

Discuss the Issue, NOT the Poster

Common insult examples and how to avoid them
Kazikli Bey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 03:44 AM   #8 (permalink)
Reeve
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: With Elvis in a underground Rock house (he's still kicking it!)
Posts: 83
Country:
Its not free at all. We just keep lozing more and more rights and we dont do nothing about it and as far as wiretapping forenghners your right they arnt protected under the 4th admement but its still absurd. They also do they same for the people in america if you haven't noticed. The second the Patriot act came into place america was no longer a meaning of any thing. Just another country that the goverment has taken care of destroying itself. Hopefully the next presidant who comes to power eares all this non-sence
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 03:51 AM   #9 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,211
Country:
Country:
It's utterly absurd to claim that "foreigners loss of rights" (which they never had under our Constitution) means that the US is taking away the 2nd or 4th amendment.

Locke, you really don't realize that NON-AMERICANS are not guaranteed citizenship rights of AMERICAN citizens?


WEB
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.

Sebelius for VP, not Hillary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 04:51 AM   #10 (permalink)
Knight
 
Alun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 567
Send a message via AIM to Alun
Quote:
Originally Posted by D Rep. Zoe Lofgren
This bill would grant the attorney general the ability to wiretap anybody, any place, any time without court review, without any checks and balances.
Why is it that nobody is saying the same thing about this bill? If the only change was an update to allow foreign calls, routed through the U.S., to be tapped, then how can the above statement be made in good conscience? The U.S. has been listening to many foreign calls already; the only change is to cover a loophole, by which calls that are wired through the U.S. are protected by law even if no one in the U.S. is on the line.
__________________
"I have nothing new to teach the world." -Mohandas "Mahatma" Gandhi
Alun is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right