Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 05-23-2007, 05:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
CHUQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: the South
Posts: 3,499
Send a message via AIM to CHUQ
Globalization Of Military Power

I have been researching this subject and thiought I would get an opinion on it from thiose here.



The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) did not fundamentally change its mandate after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the collapse of the Soviet Union. In the wake of the Cold War, NATO continued to expand. In 1999, before the NATO war against Yugoslavia, NATO expanded into Eastern Europe.

NATO is determined to expand its membership circle and to expand its mandate. Ultimately NATO is slated to become a global military force. Moreover, part of the objectives of NATO as a global military alliance is to ensure the “energy security” of its member states. What this signifies is the militarization of the world’s arteries, strategic pipeline routes, maritime traffic corridors used by oil tankers, and international waters.



The Globalization of Military Power: NATO Expansion
__________________
STUPIDITY Is The Deliberate Cultivation Of Ignorance

TRUTH exist, only a falsehood has to be invented.

Please Visit My Blog http://studiesandobservations.blogspot.com/
CHUQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 06:59 PM   #2 (permalink)
Viceroy
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 3,083
Country:
Country:
Well, it's quite interesting... NATO was devised as a mutual defence pact against invasion. Do we think it appropriate that it should be "defending energy security?" That means entangling in all sorts of foreign engagements.
__________________
... I am surprised at your insolence in writing to me at all. You know, as I know, that I bought this constituency... may God's curse light upon you and may it make your women as open and as free to the excise officers as your wives and daughters have always been to me while I have represented your scoundrel corporation.
I have the honour to be... your obliged humble servant, Anthony Henley
- MPs reply to constituent, mid 1700s
Brother Oz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 08:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
I AM SPARTICUS
 
J.Locke777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,305
Country:
Country:
Send a message via AIM to J.Locke777
Maybe NATO might become the next UN. That may yet be a good thing because of the weakness of the UN. If america withdrew, it would most likely fold because of the lack of troops and lack of a superpower to give it some direction. It will eventually go by way of the League of Nations. They folded because they were unable to enforce their decisions.
__________________
~John Locke

Discuss the Issue, Not the Poster

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not everyone is entitled to their own facts"
-Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan

"Great thoughts speak only to the thoughtful mind, but great actions speak to all mankind."
-Teddy Roosevelt
J.Locke777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 07:26 AM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
CHUQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: the South
Posts: 3,499
Send a message via AIM to CHUQ
Captain Obvious? well. I was getting tired of my other tag, "gloom and doom".
__________________
STUPIDITY Is The Deliberate Cultivation Of Ignorance

TRUTH exist, only a falsehood has to be invented.

Please Visit My Blog http://studiesandobservations.blogspot.com/
CHUQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2007, 02:17 PM   #5 (permalink)
Governor General
 
Public_Enemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Istanbul / Turkey
Posts: 851
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Public_Enemy
I think Nato will expand futher , next candidates are Georgia and Azerbaijan. Than most probably it would try to jump to the other side of Caspian Sea "Central Asia."
__________________


For Turks, the homeland isn't Turkey, nor yet Turkistan. Their country is a vast, eternal land: Turan!

Visit My Blog : Turkey Military
Public_Enemy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 01:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHUQ View Post
I have been researching this subject and thiought I would get an opinion on it from thiose here.



NATO is determined to expand its membership circle and to expand its mandate. Ultimately NATO is slated to become a global military force. Moreover, part of the objectives of NATO as a global military alliance is to ensure the “energy security” of its member states. What this signifies is the militarization of the world’s arteries, strategic pipeline routes, maritime traffic corridors used by oil tankers, and international waters.



The Globalization of Military Power: NATO Expansion
I disagree, NATO was established as a counter weight to the USSR during to cold war to defend Europe. It was argued during the Afganistan war when NATO offered to fight with America that NATO would be ineffective outside Europe, It had helped in but never faught in any wars outside Europe.

NATO is one of several regonal "collective defense" organisations. In the East they have the Collective Security Treaty Organisation, in West Africa they have the Economic Community of West African States. NATO is a Europian + Western organisation it wouldn't amit say a middle eastern nation and its perpose seems to continue to be the defense of Europe. Im pretty sure the last active war faught through NATO was in the former Yugaslavia.
__________________
"once again you show all the sinsitivity of a blunt axe"- Nearly Headless Nick
yeckle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 01:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Outside of Philadelphia
Posts: 8
Country:
I don't understand your question or statement at all.
sglax64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 09:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,259
Maybe
vladward8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right