Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 04-06-2008, 03:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
Country:
Should N.Ireland be an independent state?

What are your thoughts, I personally belive they shouldn't
NorthernIreland1928 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 03:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 229
Country:
I think any large group of people (which is subjective) should be allowed to have their own country.
nerv14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 06:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
Mercenary
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 290
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by nerv14 View Post
I think any large group of people (which is subjective) should be allowed to have their own country.
Does that include the Lakota native american tribe who keep asking the US government for independence?
__________________
No loyalty towards the EU.

In Russia is freedom of speech. In America is also freedom after speech. -- Yakov Smirnoff
jaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 08:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Taximark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 41
Country:
Country:
Very complicated.
Taximark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 09:26 PM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 229
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaro View Post
Does that include the Lakota native american tribe who keep asking the US government for independence?
sure, but I am just unsure of the size of the Lakota population. If it is only a few thousand than they shouldn't be allowed their own country. Also, a factor would be how much land they own because they can't steal land from other people and create their own nation.

The only contradiction in my statement was that I supported the Union in the Civil War, I will admit that.

Last edited by nerv14; 04-06-2008 at 09:39 PM.
nerv14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 11:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaro View Post
Does that include the Lakota native american tribe who keep asking the US government for independence?
Who are the largest Native American group and make up less than 100,000. Gee, there are more Swede-Americans in the small state of Maine than there are Lakota Indians.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nerv14 View Post
sure, but I am just unsure of the size of the Lakota population. If it is only a few thousand than they shouldn't be allowed their own country. Also, a factor would be how much land they own because they can't steal land from other people and create their own nation.

The only contradiction in my statement was that I supported the Union in the Civil War, I will admit that.
Their claims are that the white man stole Indian lands and should return them, but their population is relatively insignifigant. By the standards you've set, we'd much sooner see Irish Boston (or the Texans) declare independence than we would see Lakota Indians.

To the civil war, that is a pretty bad contradiction. Northern Ireland is a relatively small area, with a relatively small group of people (a few million, correct?). The South declared independence, mostly due to unfair taxes (see wikipedia on the morrill tarriff, an import tarriff at which point the South, with a little over 1/4 the American citizens, paid some 80% of the taxes collected). It was a tarriff designed to force Southerners, who live on agriculture (i.e. King Cotton), to stop buying their finished products from Britain and start buying lower quality, more expensive products from the Northern Industries. The Federal government was helping the North at the cost of the South.

This war was not about slavery, the abolition was a bi-product of it. Lincoln said repeatedly that he was fighting to maintain the Union (compare to Britain fighting to maintain the Union, denying independence to Americans, Irish, Northern Irish, Scottish, except in this case the bloodshed was much worse). Ulysses S. Grant, the commander of the Union Army, said that if the Civil War was to abolish slavery he'd fight for the South. Many Southern leaders denounced slavery and freed slaves, such as Lee, Jackson and Longstreet. The war wasn't about slavery, you need to forget that sentiment.

Last edited by Troianii; 04-06-2008 at 11:39 PM.
Troianii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 03:50 AM   #7 (permalink)
Mercenary
 
mairead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cowal Peninsula
Posts: 320
Country:
I don' think so but I think they should break away from British rule and join their free southern cousins.
mairead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 04:58 AM   #8 (permalink)
Governor General
 
Goldstone69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 749
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mairead View Post
I don' think so but I think they should break away from British rule and join their free southern cousins.
The majority want to remain part of the United kingdom (as in Scotland) in what way are they not free ?
__________________
"One must never forget that monetary union, which the two of us were the first to propose more than a decade ago is ultimately a political project. It aims to give a new impulse to the historic movement towards union of the European states. Monetary union is a federative project that needs to be accompanied and followed by other steps." — Giscard d'Estaing and Helmut Schmidt
Goldstone69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 07:21 AM   #9 (permalink)
Mercenary
 
mairead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cowal Peninsula
Posts: 320
Country:
The majority in Scotland do NOT wish to remain part of the Uk in spite of what you may believe.
No part of the UK is free to decide it's own future or to make it's own mistakes, and I include England in that. Even the devolved goverment in Scotland is hampered by Westminster.
mairead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 08:35 AM   #10 (permalink)
Viceroy
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 3,083
Country:
Country:
Right now, things are fairly good in Northern Ireland. Unlike the 70s or 80s, it is peaceful, they have a devolved government to an extent, and nothing should be done to jeopardise that. National Pride is far less important than peace.
__________________
... I am surprised at your insolence in writing to me at all. You know, as I know, that I bought this constituency... may God's curse light upon you and may it make your women as open and as free to the excise officers as your wives and daughters have always been to me while I have represented your scoundrel corporation.
I have the honour to be... your obliged humble servant, Anthony Henley
- MPs reply to constituent, mid 1700s
Brother Oz is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right