Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 09-16-2007, 03:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Viv
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,288
Country:
Walking to the shops damages the climate more than going by car

"Walking does more than driving to cause global warming, a leading environmentalist has calculated.

Food production is now so energy-intensive that more carbon is emitted providing a person with enough calories to walk to the shops than a car would emit over the same distance. The climate could benefit if people avoided exercise, ate less and became couch potatoes. Provided, of course, they remembered to switch off the TV rather than leaving it on standby.

The sums were done by Chris Goodall, campaigning author of How to Live a Low-Carbon Life, based on the greenhouse gases created by intensive beef production. “Driving a typical UK car for 3 miles [4.8km] adds about 0.9 kg [2lb] of CO2 to the atmosphere,” he said, a calculation based on the Government’s official fuel emission figures. “If you walked instead, it would use about 180 calories. You’d need about 100g of beef to replace those calories, resulting in 3.6kg of emissions, or four times as much as driving.

“The troubling fact is that taking a lot of exercise and then eating a bit more food is not good for the global atmosphere. Eating less and driving to save energy would be better.”

Walking to the shops ‘damages planet more than going by car’ - Times Online

Fine by me.
It was only a matter of time before some enterprising researcher came up with this. The campaign to prevent global warming would be more effective if science reached a consensus and stopped confusing us with conflicting assertions.
Viv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2007, 07:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
Hermes' Bird Moderator
 
Kazikli Bey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Amestris
Posts: 2,863
Country:
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Kazikli Bey Send a message via MSN to Kazikli Bey
Well, i've always maintained that us humans were the largest contributor of greenhouse gas emissions. the answer to the problem:

QUICK STOP BREATHING
__________________
I hear people saying how they are going to fight in the Revolution, how they're goin' to die for the Revolution. You know what, I never hear anybody say how they're gonna kill for the Revolution. You know what I say? I say 'Fuck the Revolution'.

The BEST comic ever!!!

Discuss the Issue, NOT the Poster

Common insult examples and how to avoid them
Kazikli Bey is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right