|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|
02-18-2007, 08:46 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,256
Country:
Country:
|
Highly recommend "An Inconvenient Truth"
Hey guys,
So I finished watching an Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore's video on global warming. I am recommending it to everyone I know and to all of the classes I teach. This is a rare exception I am making, as I generally never recommend anything to those classes. However, you really need to see the video to understand how severe this problem is.
I really think that we are bringing great ruin upon ourselves by not doing enough to fight global warming. I highly advise you all to check out the DVD or video for yourselves.
WEB
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 06:07 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
DoubleplusgoodMod
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Planet Vulcan
Posts: 2,847
Country:
Country:
|
I'm pretty uneducated on this topic, to say the least. I'll look into the movie pretty soon. I'm trying to find good sources about both sides of the issue.
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 07:20 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 177
|
I thought it was pretty good (caught it on PPV).
I think he could have spent a little more time discussing and rebutting the arguments against global warming, but other than that I thought it was an excellent movie.
The part where he is standing in front of the big chart talking about greenhouse gasses and average temperatures and then he steps onto the platform and goes up, then up some more, was, IMO, a particularly effective visual aid. I am still not completely sold on the idea that we can stop global warming, but the image of al gore on a man lift way up there at the top of that chart pops into my mind everytime I think about the issue.
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 08:18 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,256
Country:
Country:
|
Well, I didn't feel that this personal background was inappropriate. I think he was trying to show his connection to the good earth. He was speaking from the point of view of the common man, or at least trying to.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 08:53 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodlawn TN
Posts: 317
Country:
|
********totally watched it objectivley*********
bored the shit out of me.....it is an important subject dont think al gore should be its spokesman .....he is boring period
__________________
"Let Valor Not Fail"

|
|
|
02-26-2007, 09:26 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Azure Skyline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Mud Wastes
Posts: 36
|
I absolutely hated the movie. I had to stop it 40 minutes through because I just couldn't take it any more. The only decent part in it was the semi-humourous clip from Futurama.
Gore said nothing I was not already aware of--indeed, a lot of what he said I would be willing to classify as "common knowledge" and it seemed that MOST of the movie was spent with him lamenting (read: whining) on his loss to Bush in 2000. Nearly half of what I saw was spent on the 2000 election; it had no bearing to the theme of the movie, and really drove-home the point that Gore's target audience was not the "American Citizen" but rather the card-carrying Democrat--his fans, so to speak.
More than a call to action, I think the movie was more of a bid for attention.
__________________
If you would be a real seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things.
-Descartes
We have arranged for ourselves a world in which we can live - by positing bodies, lines, planes, causes and effects, motion and rest, form and content; without these articles of faith nobody could now endure life. But that does not prove them. Life is no argument. The conditions of life might include error.
-Nietzsche
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 09:38 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,256
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox
I absolutely hated the movie. I had to stop it 40 minutes through because I just couldn't take it any more. The only decent part in it was the semi-humourous clip from Futurama.
Gore said nothing I was not already aware of--indeed, a lot of what he said I would be willing to classify as "common knowledge" and it seemed that MOST of the movie was spent with him lamenting (read: whining) on his loss to Bush in 2000. Nearly half of what I saw was spent on the 2000 election; it had no bearing to the theme of the movie, and really drove-home the point that Gore's target audience was not the "American Citizen" but rather the card-carrying Democrat--his fans, so to speak.
More than a call to action, I think the movie was more of a bid for attention.
|
Wow, I don't think we were watching the same movie.
There was like a 30 second segment in there that talked about the 2000 election, and a few times where he criticized Bush but you say that half of it was about that election.....Also, ask yourself this: how awkward would the movie have been had he NOT mentioned the 2000 election at all? That would be like Julian Bond not mentioning African-American politics or African-American history, or Gingrich not mentioning big government, or Jerry Falwell not mentioning religion.
The 2000 election defined Gore. It would have been really weird had he NOT mentioned it.
I don't agree it at all the that movie was a bid for attention. I teach a few classes and a lot of the students I spoke to from different schools told me that their classes had all gone out to the theater to see the movie. The movie is being distributed to ALL schools in the United Kingdom. I don't think people would distribute it so much if it was just much ado about nothing.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 09:40 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,256
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rakkasan
********totally watched it objectivley*********
bored the shit out of me.....it is an important subject dont think al gore should be its spokesman .....he is boring period
|
Would it have been more exciting if McCain did it? Giulilani? Obama? It would have been the same thing. I don't see any other politician doing a better job on delivery than Gore.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.
|
|
|
02-27-2007, 12:32 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Azure Skyline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Mud Wastes
Posts: 36
|
My 1/2 thing was more my impression of what I saw, rather than me sitting there and timing it out. He came back to the election on several occasions. It was just too much for me.
The 2000 election may have been a big event for AL GORE, but it wasn't a big event for global warming. I was expecting a movie about global warming... it wasn't what I got.
__________________
If you would be a real seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things.
-Descartes
We have arranged for ourselves a world in which we can live - by positing bodies, lines, planes, causes and effects, motion and rest, form and content; without these articles of faith nobody could now endure life. But that does not prove them. Life is no argument. The conditions of life might include error.
-Nietzsche
|
|
|
02-27-2007, 01:09 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,256
Country:
Country:
|
You paid for a movie about global warming and that is exactly what you got. The 2000 election was mentioned about two times, that I recall for a total of less than a minute for all references to that election. You may not have liked the film, but if you think it was about the 2000 election then I guess you only saw like 5 minutes of the film. It would be like saying that The Matrix was a film about Pepsi, because there was one scene where a Pepsi can was visible for 20 seconds.
Again, I don't see why this film would be standard issue in UK schools (and very much so in American schools), if it was a film about the political ambition of Al Gore, as you claim.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.
Last edited by Sebelius for VP, not Hillary; 02-27-2007 at 01:24 AM.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:48 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|