Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD
I believe we know how hard creating a fusion reactor is which is why spending money on the theoretical physics might make more sense right now than throwing money at hardware. The question is, where do you get the most cluck for the buck. If you waste your money on hardware then it restricts the theoretical research which is unquestionable where the ultimate solution lies. Eventually you need the hardware but are we there yet? I don't think so.
|
I wondered if you even read my post, or you even went to the site of the ITER-project, or made a small research of the knowledge and former research regarding nuclear fusion...
The ITER-project is, as I said, an experimental reactor.
But this research is already going on for almost 30 years...
You're right when you say it will take probably almost 50 years or so that we can built real, operatable and profitable nuclear fusion plants...
As you know fusion power is the same as the energy of a star, that is why we also are spending a lot of money on theoretical physics...
I'm talking about the research at the French-Swiss border were they built the Large Hadron Collidor (LHC), that is meant to tell us of what matter the universe is built of... if you want more information about this subject I refer you to the National Geographic Magazine of March 2008 (this article (with amazing photos) was published worlwide).
This project, and also the ITER-project (and many, many others), are the beginning of a new era...not only for humankind but also for Europe as a whole...that demands it's place back after more than 50 years as the spill of scientific research!