Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
My question follows.
It takes fuel to grow corn. You gotta use energy to pump the gas to water the crops, create and transport the fertilizer, harvest and process the corn.
After all that is done, we put the corn and get a return in energy.
Now is that energy greater than or less than the energy used to make the corn?
|
Its nice to see one to ask the very basic question once.
The answer is: it depends.
First of all it depends on what you are growing and what fuel exactly you make out of it. I have heard from someone that it can cause an 1:4 energy surplus. (I hope I remember correctly)
Apart from the specifics of the plant and the type of fuel the very central factor is the transport. If you carry the stuff from one side of America to the other one, you will have a negative result. That means we are talking here about a decentral form of energy. We need small to medium facilities spread over the whole country in order that it makes sense.
I personally think that at least in Europe the politicians have hidden agricultural subsidies in mind when fostering biodiesel for example. I just hope they have considered the studies also. Because there exist quite a considerable amounts about the very question you posted WEB.
What makes sense for sure though is that farmers grow their very own fuel. That has a strategic aspect too. Just think about it. No oil crises, no matter how severe can stop this farmer from using his machines anymore. Its a major step to increase the stability of your food supply.
PS:
For those who dream of completely replacing gas through biodiesel, I guess I have to disappoint you. Your farmers dont even have enough capcities for only producing enough for all your cars. Even if you would stop completely growing food.