|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|
10-25-2006, 03:13 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Earl
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,570
|
Like being black in Florida
No evidence that blacks were disenfranchised in Florida.
|
|
|
10-25-2006, 03:28 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Knight
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois60
Like being black in Florida
No evidence that blacks were disenfranchised in Florida.
|
Plenty of circumstantial evidence.
|
|
|
10-25-2006, 03:29 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fruitcove, FL
Posts: 1,220
|
Anytime a democrat does not win a race there are claims of disenfranchised voters. How strange....
|
|
|
10-25-2006, 03:38 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Knight
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
|
Florida was exceptional. Jeb said he'd deliver Florida and he kept his word.
Quote:
Perhaps the most dramatic undercount in this election was the nonexistent ballots of the countless unknown eligible voters, who were wrongfully purged from the voter registration rolls, turned away from the polls, and by various other means prevented from exercising the franchise. While statistical data, reinforced by credible anecdotal evidence, point to widespread disenfranchisement and denial of voting rights, it is impossible to determine the extent of the disenfranchisement or to provide an adequate remedy to the persons whose voices were silenced in this historic election by a pattern and practice of injustice, ineptitude and inefficiency.
The Washington Post
|
|
|
|
10-25-2006, 03:55 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Earl
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,570
|
I can't address the anecdotal evidence, but I can address the purges.
The purge list contained approximately the same number of felons as Florida actually had. Therefore, if there was any non-felon on that list, a corresponding felon was eligible to vote. Also, the purge list had approximately as many blacks on it as their proportion of felons. So for every black non-felon disenfranchised, there was a black felon who became a legal voter.
|
|
|
10-25-2006, 04:15 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Knight
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois60
I can't address the anecdotal evidence, but I can address the purges.
The purge list contained approximately the same number of felons as Florida actually had. Therefore, if there was any non-felon on that list, a corresponding felon was eligible to vote. Also, the purge list had approximately as many blacks on it as their proportion of felons. So for every black non-felon disenfranchised, there was a black felon who became a legal voter.
|
I haven't heard that argument before. Interesting.
|
|
|
10-25-2006, 04:42 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Earl
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,570
|
It's simple math.
It's the first question I asked when Greg Palast started making accusations. Okay, we know that there were mistakes on the purge list. But in order for there to be an effort to disenfranchise Democrats for Bush's benefit, you have to actually, you know, disenfranchise Democrats. Which would mean a felon purge list that was larger than the number of actual felons in Florida.
Otherwise, all you've done is legalized felons and disenfranchised random voters. Which actually COSTS the Republicans votes, since "random voter" is more likely to vote GOP than a felon.
|
|
|
10-25-2006, 05:13 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fruitcove, FL
Posts: 1,220
|
Also, you had Gore trying to kepp overseas military votes from being counted.
|
|
|
10-25-2006, 05:17 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Knight
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by superbug
Also, you had Gore trying to kepp overseas military votes from being counted.
|
I hadn't heard that either, but it wouldn't surprise me. IMO, Bush was just the better thief.
|
|
|
10-25-2006, 05:19 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fruitcove, FL
Posts: 1,220
|
No one stole anything here in Florida. The letter of the law was followed and for whatever reason the Democrats didn't like it. But it seems to be the norm now for lawsuits if Democrats do not win an election.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|