|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|

05-08-2008, 04:43 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,389
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanhope
But the circumstances and the reasons for this gay sex differ, so, if apple and oranges does not work for you, Yellow and green aplles then? But the tow are not axactly the same, are they?
AH
|
No, the reasons have a lot of similarity. The people having the gay sex don't think much about honor and dignity and they enjoy the gay sex. That is the same for gays who are on the outside of jail as well. It's yellow apples and yellow apples, to use your modified analogy.
Aside from which, I don't think the circumstance or reasons for the gay sex are relevant to my point about the learned nature of homosexual behavior.
|

05-08-2008, 04:49 PM
|
 |
Mercenary
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 379
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
People in jail have gay sex. People outside of jail have gay sex. That is apples and apples. I highly doubt that people in jail fuck each other up the ass to get back at "the man", as you imply. 
|
Apples and oranges my friend.
Humans are a pack animal. They need companionship. In the lack of women, some will bed men.
It is not about getting back at the man. It is about exerting some control in your life when you have no other control.
Many criminals are very animalistic, think of it as establishing dominance over the weaker members of the pack.
Most of the time, your termed "gay sex" in regards to prisoners, is not consensual.
__________________
"America is not at war. The U.S. military is at war. America is at the
mall."
Last edited by Ummwhat : 05-08-2008 at 04:52 PM.
|

05-08-2008, 04:50 PM
|
|
Mercenary
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 261
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
Do you think that men in jail were gay before they went in and will be gay once they get out? If it is enduring, why does it only last while they are in jail?
Can you be more specific about these physiological differences between gays and straights?
|
I don't know why sex deprived criminals resort to homosexual acts while in prison, nor do I know how common it is or how likely they are to retain such behavior upon leaving prison. Do you have any statistics on the specifics I can't answer the unknown?
I do know however that no environmental factors have ever conclusively been shown to cause someone to be gay. There are technically neither any hormonal or genetic ones either however environmental factors are much easier to study and we are still learning about genetics and hormones.
As for the physiological differences between gays and straights they are indisputable. If your opinion holds true then that would mean a person's body can literally change just from participating in different kinds of acts.
Quote:
Physiological differences in gay men and lesbians
Recent studies have found notable differences between the physiology of gay people and non-gay people. There is evidence that:
* The average size of the INAH-3 in the brains of gay men is approximately the same size as INAH 3 in women, which is significantly smaller, and the cells more densely packed, than in heterosexual men's brains.[91]
* The suprachiasmatic nucleus was found by Swaab and Hopffman to be larger in gay men than in non-gay men [92], the suprachiasmatic nucleus is also known to be larger in men than in women [93].
* The anterior commissure is larger in women than men, and larger in gay men than in non-gay men.[94]
* Gay men have, on an average, slightly longer and thicker penises than non-gay men.[95]
* Gay men's brains respond differently to fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.[96]
* The functioning of the inner ear and the central auditory system in lesbians and bisexual women are more like the functional properties found in men than in non-gay women (the researchers argued this finding was consistent with the prenatal hormonal theory of sexual orientation).[97]
* The startle response (eyeblink following a loud sound) is similarly masculinized in lesbians and bisexual women.[98]
* Three regions of the brain (medial prefrontal cortex, left hippocampus, and right amygdala) are more active in gay men than non-gay men when exposed to sexually arousing material.[99]
* Gay and non-gay people emit different armpit odors.[100]
* Gay men are more likely to have a counter-clockwise hair whorl pattern. [101]
* Gay and non-gay people's brains respond differently to two human sex pheromones (AND, found in male armpit secretions, and EST, found in female urine).[102][103][104]
* Finger length ratios between the index and ring fingers may be different between non-gay and lesbian women.
|
Homosexuality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|

05-08-2008, 04:52 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 128
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
All of my answers were straightforward and "at least" honest. Yours were not. You automatically rule out disagreement about your physical arguments as not straightforward or not honest, which is a dishonest comment in and of itself.
|
My physical arguments seem to have gone over your head. My questions about whether straight people could go against their nature and participate in gay sex was addressing the issue of gays being "cured" of their homosexuality. I simply turned the notion around, just as I turned the idea of "choice" around by asking when the topic starter "chose" to be straight. Doing so exposes the logical flaws in such thinking.
Neither you nor the topic starter chose to be straight. You just are. That's where the real double standard is. You understand that you are attracted to women and not men. But you fail to accept that there are men who are attracted to men and not women, that it somehow has to be a choice because of your orientation.
Placing a gay person in a situation whereby they go against their nature and have heterosexual sex is not evidence that homosexuality is a choice. It is more akin to your example of a heterosexual turning to gay sex in prison. Contrary behavior in no way invalidates one's natural orientation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
You are entitled to yours, however it becomes a problem when you force others to live by that belief, while accusing your opponents of doing that.
|
Exactly how is allowing gays to have gay sex forcing anything on you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
I don't want to give my blessing to homosexuality and you seek to force the majority of Americans who share this view to do just that. That is a big problem, in addition to the problem of your promotion of homosexuality. Those are two big problems that you create.
|
I'm promoting homosexuality? Sorry, I am not a recruiter. I'm straight as an arrow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
As for blacks and whites, well there was a time when we burned witches too, however none of this discussion about race or witchcraft is germane to the present debate.
|
Actually it is germane. There's a common factor in all of it, including your witch burning. Religious intolerance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
What's wrong is wrong. Consenting adults can still do the wrong thing.
|
It is your contention that being gay is wrong. It is mine that it is not.
Last edited by Gnuf Said : 05-08-2008 at 04:55 PM.
|

05-08-2008, 04:54 PM
|
 |
Viscount
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,309
Location: Potchefstroom, South Africa
Country:
|
|
|
It is - since not all homosexual behaviour is learned. I CAN have a girl, the guy in jail can not, I do not have an attraction to a girl (the guy in the jail does) therefor the two are not the same.
Again, and I have said this often - I believe the reason why science has not find THE reason for homosexuality, is because there is no one reason for it. Some people have gay sex, because of circumstances (that is jail for instance) others choose so, for what otehr reason, others may have been 'made so, by som incidence in their childhood, or whatever, others are born that way, etc. etc. etc.
You take people for m one catogory, the people in jail, and comparethem with all the rest.
To go to your anology of Nazi's. The pope, as a young boy, was forced to join the Hilter youth. In the Us you may have a guy who joins a Neo-Nazi movement. Can we now compare the two? No. Circumstancesforced the pope as a young man into that position, the other's reasons are different.
AH
__________________
After climbing a great hill, one only finds that there are many more hills to climb.
For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.
I detest racialism, because I regard it as a barbaric thing, whether it comes from a black man or a white man. - Nelson Mandela
|

05-08-2008, 04:54 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,389
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ummwhat
Apples and oranges my friend.
Humans are a pack animal. They need companionship. In the lack of women, some will bed men.
It is not about getting back at the man. It is about exerting some control in your life when you have no other control.
Many criminals are very animalistic, think of it as establishing dominance over the weaker members of the pack.
|
Apples and apples, sir.
Humans can be pack animals: fine. They need companionship: fine. In the lack of women some will bed with men: fine. None of this undermines my point that a significant part of homosexuality is learned behavior and is thus CHOICE.
Your comment about convicts having gay sex to have control, is laughable. All inmates could spread feces on their jail cells to have some control too, but they don't do that. It's not about control. It's about the pleasure they derive from having gay sex. Yet, it's highly unlikely that they did this before they came to jail or will do this after they leave jail. Thus, the homosexuality they demonstrate is not ingrained and it is choice.
There are many many ways to exhibit dominance over other men, however once it just doesn't pass the common sense test to say that convicts have sex with each other to show that they dominate over each other. That's just too silly an argument.
WEB
|

05-08-2008, 04:57 PM
|
 |
Viscount
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,309
Location: Potchefstroom, South Africa
Country:
|
|
|
No it is not. Not all men in jail have gay sex for the pleasure. For that the instances of rape in jail is just ot high. All research proof that rape (striahgt or gay) has nothing to do with sex, and everything with power. Therefor his asumption is not that far fetched. Again, both aretrue, some have sex in jaiul, as a way to satisfy a need, others rape in jail, to assert dominance.
AH
__________________
After climbing a great hill, one only finds that there are many more hills to climb.
For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.
I detest racialism, because I regard it as a barbaric thing, whether it comes from a black man or a white man. - Nelson Mandela
|

05-08-2008, 05:00 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Napolitano or Sebelius for VP; make history, Obama
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,389
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanhope
It is - since not all homosexual behaviour is learned. I CAN have a girl, the guy in jail can not, I do not have an attraction to a girl (the guy in the jail does) therefor the two are not the same.
|
I'd like to see some scientific proof for your claim that "not all homosexual behavior is learned." The guy in jail cannot have a girl, but he can jack off in his cell or fuck his bed. He chooses to be gay, just as people outside of jail choose to be gay. Regardless of what the conditions are, the conditions are irrelevant to my point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanhope
Again, and I have said this often - I believe the reason why science has not find THE reason for homosexuality, is because there is no one reason for it. Some people have gay sex, because of circumstances (that is jail for instance) others choose so, for what otehr reason, others may have been 'made so, by som incidence in their childhood, or whatever, others are born that way, etc. etc. etc.
|
I think that it's strange to see people argue that people are biologically gay with the admission that "science has not find the reason for homosexuality." That really needs to be looked at and kept in mind. Proponents of homosexuality argue that they have proof knowing full well that they don't have it. That is a remarkable thing to do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanhope
You take people for m one catogory, the people in jail, and comparethem with all the rest.
To go to your anology of Nazi's. The pope, as a young boy, was forced to join the Hilter youth. In the Us you may have a guy who joins a Neo-Nazi movement. Can we now compare the two? No. Circumstancesforced the pope as a young man into that position, the other's reasons are different.
AH
|
We can compare that Nazism is not something INGRAINED, if the Pope can demonstrate that he despises Nazism but at one point was a Nazi because he was highly motivated to do so.
|

05-08-2008, 05:06 PM
|
 |
Mercenary
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 379
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
Apples and apples, sir.
Humans can be pack animals: fine. They need companionship: fine. In the lack of women some will bed with men: fine. None of this undermines my point that a significant part of homosexuality is learned behavior and is thus CHOICE.
|
I do not know if it is choice or not. That is not what I am arguing. What I am arguing is that prison sex, and free sex are not the same.
Quote:
|
Your comment about convicts having gay sex to have control, is laughable. All inmates could spread feces on their jail cells to have some control too, but they don't do that. It's not about control. It's about the pleasure they derive from having gay sex. Yet, it's highly unlikely that they did this before they came to jail or will do this after they leave jail. Thus, the homosexuality they demonstrate is not ingrained and it is choice.
|
Really? The prisoners and the DOJ say different. I never said that prisoners having sex and raping other men is not a choice.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/svrca06.pdf
Prison sexuality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
“Prison sexuality, often viewed as facultative or situational, shows quite similar dominance traits to those of apes,"
Quote:
There are many many ways to exhibit dominance over other men, however once it just doesn't pass the common sense test to say that convicts have sex with each other to show that they dominate over each other. That's just too silly an argument.
WEB
|
You sir need to research your stances a bit before you speak.
__________________
"America is not at war. The U.S. military is at war. America is at the
mall."
Last edited by Ummwhat : 05-08-2008 at 05:10 PM.
|

05-08-2008, 05:06 PM
|
 |
Viscount
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,309
Location: Potchefstroom, South Africa
Country:
|
|
|
No. There is proof that homosexuality is genetic. And there is proof that it is learned behaviour. I did not admit that there is no proof, I said that thereis no proof for ONE reason for homosecuality. I am not goingto post proof that not all homosexuality is learned, sincce it is late here, and there is a few threads on this forum where that proof has already been posted.
I am saying that all thse things have bee nscietifically proven, and that I think that is becauuse all of them aretrue for some people.
There is one proof I will mention - and that is not scientific, this istrue - but it is not personal.
I did not want to be gsay. I did a hell of a lot not to be gay. I made myself incfedibly unhappy in the process. The fact remains, I am gay, and in my circumstance, it was not choice, nor was it forced on me, or was I made gay.
But still I am gay. That is my proof for now.
And it is almost midnight, and I am of to bed.
HAve a good one folks.
AH
__________________
After climbing a great hill, one only finds that there are many more hills to climb.
For to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others.
I detest racialism, because I regard it as a barbaric thing, whether it comes from a black man or a white man. - Nelson Mandela
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|