|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|
05-02-2008, 10:41 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Governor General
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 850
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by themisfithitman
So today has been eventful for me. I was out of the house for a total of two (2) hours before being suspended from my school for two (2) days. As most of anyone who will read this knows, the Day of Silence was April 25th, 2008. But my school decided to have their official Day of Silence today , April 30th (I don't know why, but they did).
The Day of Silence, I feel, is a rather silly and counterintuitive concept, because it takes the gays (for want of a better word) and pulls them farther away from normal society. Don't get me wrong I support gay rights and all that, but that's to come in the story. I think that a day of silence for anything is really just a ridiculous idea that is nothing, and really accomplishes nothing either.
Moving on. I said I support gay rights, I think they should have all the rights and privileges and get the same respect that straight people get. They are people too. So this morning, I go into school, and I'm just wandering aimlessly around, because most of my friends are doing the Day of Silence, and I respect that. I see one friend who I know is not doing the Day, so I go over to ask him a question. He is standing near some kids who are playing hackysack, and there is one other kid there who is just firing rapid inappropriate things at these other kids who are playing hackysack (and who are also doing the Day). He called these kids "cocks" at least five or six times in the space of one or two minutes that I was there. It was extremely offensive, even to me, that he could be such an evil person that he would stoop so low.
So I told him so shut up... My turn, this kid rounds on me, and starts calling me a "f**g*t" (which I actually find funny, because of the gay awareness element of the day of silence) and a bunch of other derogatory/negative terms. But none of them really phased me that much.
Now this wasn't the first time this kid has decided to stir up trouble. This is the first time I've decided to finish it. I told him to shut up again, but he continued insulting me and the other kids there. So I punched him in the mouth. You may not see it as a noble story, but if you're going to go around mouthing off to people for their beliefs, and being a jackass in general. You better be damn ready to defend that.
If you're going to call people derogatory terms, you deserve to be punched, not once, but by every person you tried to degrade. If you have no value in the group other then being a jackass, you don't belong anywhere near that group of people. If you can honestly verbally berate someone while they can't defend themselves, you need to rethink your life.
I'm just trying to bring the fact that everyone needs respect, or at least the chance at respect. You can't make fun of people because they support one thing, and you just fear them so you make fun of them. You need to have an opinion and stick to it. You need to be ready to fight (whether or not it is physical) to defend your opinion. But if you are insulting gays and their friends and supporters because you are a homophobe. You need to go sit in the corner and mind your own damn business.
Thanks for listening, and seriously, the world will be a better place if we all just stopped picking on each other.
P.S. I got a split knuckle and a two-day suspension (I'm 16) as a result of my actions, but I am willing to accept that because I knew what I was getting into when I punched that kid, he deserved it and I willingly accepted the consequences.
P.P.S. I wrote this yesterday. Didn't post it here til today!
(I want your opinions on this story!)
|
I have never heard of the Day of Silence.
Here is my take on your story here. The guy was being a prick obviously and deserved what he got.
BUThere is my problem with the whole situation: This was at school. A place where reading, writing, and math is suppose to be taught. Yet here we have actual taxpayer funded school time, being dedicated to some event that takes away from learning. How come you can have a Day of Silence for gays, but you cant have a Day of Prayer? Anybody see the double standard here? Prayer is silent, so how come people are ok with being silent and reflecting upon gay people, yet throw a hissy fit when someone wants to say a prayer?
This thread goes well in hand with my own about brainwashing kids in school these days. They can take time out for a political agenda and political topic, but cant say a simple prayer? Why cant we just teach the basic subjects in school anymore? WHy do we have to turn our schools into little Hitleristic instiutions that churn out "good political citizens"?
I think it was good that you stood up to this kid, he obviously needed a straighting up from somebody. No reason to talk the way he did to the other kids.
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 11:43 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Mercenary
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 363
Country:
Country:
|
Those other kids need to learn how to stand up for themselves. You cant protect everybody. Someone 260 pounds of muscle let me see you then take em on. What you done was Bullshit!! when you get out of school that type of behaviour would lead you straight to jail. Words reach people faster and they inspire people tell me what would happen if the same kid sees you out and decides to blow your brains out with a shotgun. Violence begets more violence you could end up dead,a closed fist is no match for a gun. He used words it is quite clear that hes not a fighter, you could have used words as well. But you chose to use your weapons(fist) what happens if he decides its not over and gets a more advanced weapon. Instead of trying to be a spartan and fight try and use words to help your friends to stand up for themselves. Because when your not around that same kid could do some serious harm to your friends. Dead men cant fight!!
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 12:25 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Governor General
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 758
Country:
Country:
|
Where were the authority figures? Why was it your responsibility to punish the kid? You could not have reported this incident instead of taking action yourself? I think you should have received a much harsher punishment.
As for the day of silence, sounds like it turned into a day of suppressing free speech. Even if it is bile and venom that is being spouted, free speech still covers idiocy. If it did not, we would not have presidential debates.
How can you expect people to learn to debate and express themselves civilly if you don’t handle responses in a civil manner yourself? His inability to express himself in a civil manner was probably the most effective way of discrediting his point. Your way made it so he could take you down with him.
__________________
I am more concerned with the intellectual environment
'Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not.'
~ Thomas Jefferson
64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 01:20 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Knight
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 514
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHat
I have never heard of the Day of Silence.
Here is my take on your story here. The guy was being a prick obviously and deserved what he got.
BUThere is my problem with the whole situation: This was at school. A place where reading, writing, and math is suppose to be taught. Yet here we have actual taxpayer funded school time, being dedicated to some event that takes away from learning. How come you can have a Day of Silence for gays, but you cant have a Day of Prayer? Anybody see the double standard here? Prayer is silent, so how come people are ok with being silent and reflecting upon gay people, yet throw a hissy fit when someone wants to say a prayer?
This thread goes well in hand with my own about brainwashing kids in school these days. They can take time out for a political agenda and political topic, but cant say a simple prayer? Why cant we just teach the basic subjects in school anymore? WHy do we have to turn our schools into little Hitleristic instiutions that churn out "good political citizens"?
I think it was good that you stood up to this kid, he obviously needed a straighting up from somebody. No reason to talk the way he did to the other kids.
|
I do believe that students should be allowed to pray in school, but to my knowledge most schools do have something for Christmas which is obviously a Christian thing although it's easy to forget the religious connotations. Also technically nothing stops you from praying. It's not like Christians have this requirement where you aren't praying if your not on your knees like Muslims seem to have. I just don't believe in teacher led prayer, which doesn't seem to serve any real purpose and would only cause problems.
As for your second paragraph that is a bit of hypocrisy on your part since your belief in prayer in schools IS a political agenda.
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 01:22 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Knight
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 514
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzibeth
Wow. I'm actually kind of surprised at the response here. ^_^ I expected at least one dissenting view.
|
You spoke to soon.
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 02:51 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
SPAM Canner Mod
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,444
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast
Where were the authority figures?
|
Not caring, like they most generally are, undoubtedly. The way high school administrations handle such situations reflect their overall incompetence as "authority figures."
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast
Why was it your responsibility to punish the kid?
|
It's easy for you to pull the guilt trip here, but retaliation in this case was not wrong. You talk of "freedom of speech," yet those who founded such principles killed each other in duels to the death over family feuds based on petty insults back and forth. Exhibit A: Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton.
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast
You could not have reported this incident instead of taking action yourself? I think you should have received a much harsher punishment.
|
So what? What does that solve now? Obviously nothing. He accepted responsibility for his actions, even though the other "student" was so richly deserving of a much worse beating. Was the other student not able to defend himself? What a fear mongering society this is if every punch thrown and every mention of the word "gun" gets someone in trouble that could potentially ruin their education and/or lives. Pathetic. He deserved it. End of story.
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast
As for the day of silence, sounds like it turned into a day of suppressing free speech.
|
The framers of our constitution killed each other over petty insults, so your little pitch about how his actions "suppressed free speech" have no consequence to reality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast
Even if it is bile and venom that is being spouted, free speech still covers idiocy. If it did not, we would not have presidential debates.
|
It doesn't cover slander and libel. Calling someone names which they are not can be considered such--if you are going so far to consider challenging the deliverer of libel/striking him down "suppressing freedom of speech"
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast
How can you expect people to learn to debate and express themselves civilly if you don’t handle responses in a civil manner yourself?
|
Like our founding fathers, right? Your point relies on an unnecessary guilt trip rather than the truth that some people really do deserve what they get.
__________________
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."
-John F. Kennedy
"Education begins the gentleman, but reading, good company and reflection must finish him."
-John Locke
"What worries you, masters you."
-John Locke
___________________
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 03:38 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Governor General
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 850
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemesis
I do believe that students should be allowed to pray in school, but to my knowledge most schools do have something for Christmas which is obviously a Christian thing although it's easy to forget the religious connotations. Also technically nothing stops you from praying. It's not like Christians have this requirement where you aren't praying if your not on your knees like Muslims seem to have. I just don't believe in teacher led prayer, which doesn't seem to serve any real purpose and would only cause problems.
|
Right nothing stops anybody from saying a prayer alone, and nothing stops anybody from having a moment of silence for gay people alone either. Fact is, the schools are giving gay people a day all to their own, yet wont do the same for religious people. See the difference?
Quote:
|
As for your second paragraph that is a bit of hypocrisy on your part since your belief in prayer in schools IS a political agenda.
|
Hypocrisy? I pointed out a mere double standard that is all, you dont even know where I stand on prayer in school, so how can you call me a hypocrit? All I said was why is it ok to have a Day of Silence for gay people, yet not ok to have a Day of Silence for religious people?
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 03:46 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Governor General
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 758
Country:
Country:
|
Locke
Colourislast
Not caring, like they most generally are, undoubtedly. The way high school administrations handle such situations reflect their overall incompetence as "authority figures."
An over generalization. There are plenty of teachers that care about the welfare of the students along with councilors, security staff, coaches, office staff and school administrators.
It's easy for you to pull the guilt trip here, but retaliation in this case was not wrong. You talk of "freedom of speech," yet those who founded such principles killed each other in duels to the death over family feuds based on petty insults back and forth. Exhibit A: Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton.
The founders also owned slaves, would only allow rich white men to vote, grew pot and slaughtered the indigenous people of the land. Which of those attributes should we be able to emulate today in order to get away with breaking current laws?
So what? What does that solve now? Obviously nothing. He accepted responsibility for his actions, even though the other "student" was so richly deserving of a much worse beating. Was the other student not able to defend himself? What a fear mongering society this is if every punch thrown and every mention of the word "gun" gets someone in trouble that could potentially ruin their education and/or lives. Pathetic. He deserved it. End of story.
Are we going to regress to fighting in the streets to solve disputes? If one beats up another, they were right? Bring back duels and say it is a fair fight because the other guy was armed too? Are we going to advocate beating someone for the words they use? “He deserved it. End of story.” Where is the part of the story that has laws in it?
The framers of our constitution killed each other over petty insults, so your little pitch about how his actions "suppressed free speech" have no consequence to reality.
Again, they also owned slaves. They were wrong then and it is wrong now.
It doesn't cover slander and libel. Calling someone names which they are not can be considered such--if you are going so far to consider challenging the deliverer of libel/striking him down "suppressing freedom of speech”
Insults are not slander and the kid got beat up before he could write anything down.
Like our founding fathers, right? Your point relies on an unnecessary guilt trip rather than the truth that some people really do deserve what they get.
Use that logic train after you break the law. It will derail just as fast as it did here. There are laws, one should use them and follow them. Not justify breaking them because someone else did worse 2 centuries ago.
__________________
I am more concerned with the intellectual environment
'Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not.'
~ Thomas Jefferson
64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 03:57 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Nicest Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,719
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHat
Right nothing stops anybody from saying a prayer alone, and nothing stops anybody from having a moment of silence for gay people alone either. Fact is, the schools are giving gay people a day all to their own, yet wont do the same for religious people. See the difference?
|
Wrong. Day of Silence is not a school sponsored event. It is a completely voluntary activity that students chose to participate in. They had to get permission from their teachers in order to be allowed to not speak at all during the day and if a teacher disagreed (and, for example, called on a student to answer a question in class) and the student refused to speak anyway, they could be sent out of class or given a detention or whatever. It states this very clearly on the website for the event.
So, again, Day of Silence was not sponsored by any part of the state. It was personal.
Kids are more than welcome to have a Day of Prayer in a public school if they would like. But if they wanted to be exempt from answering questions while 'praying', or have a huge assembly in the auditorium during school hours where everyone could pray, or other things.. they would not be able to.
There is no double standard here at all. The schools did not encourage nor prohibit Day of Silence.
Also, May 1st is apparently National Day of Prayer. So... I'm sure the fact that there is a national day for praying (which kids in school can do, too) makes up for any "unfairness" at having a small scale day of respect for LGBTQ students who are killed or harassed every day for their sexual identities/preferences.
|
|
|
05-02-2008, 04:54 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Marquis
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,042
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke9-05
Not caring, like they most generally are, undoubtedly. The way high school administrations handle such situations reflect their overall incompetence as "authority figures."
It's easy for you to pull the guilt trip here, but retaliation in this case was not wrong. You talk of "freedom of speech," yet those who founded such principles killed each other in duels to the death over family feuds based on petty insults back and forth. Exhibit A: Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton.
So what? What does that solve now? Obviously nothing. He accepted responsibility for his actions, even though the other "student" was so richly deserving of a much worse beating. Was the other student not able to defend himself? What a fear mongering society this is if every punch thrown and every mention of the word "gun" gets someone in trouble that could potentially ruin their education and/or lives. Pathetic. He deserved it. End of story.
The framers of our constitution killed each other over petty insults, so your little pitch about how his actions "suppressed free speech" have no consequence to reality.
It doesn't cover slander and libel. Calling someone names which they are not can be considered such--if you are going so far to consider challenging the deliverer of libel/striking him down "suppressing freedom of speech"
Like our founding fathers, right? Your point relies on an unnecessary guilt trip rather than the truth that some people really do deserve what they get.
|
I felt some historical inaccuracies are needed of correction.
Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton did indeed fight in a duel on the plains of Weehawken according to the code duello, but they were not founders of the constitutional rights such as free speech, nor are those men deserving of the title "founding father".
Alexander Hamilton was a viciously anti-Democratic elitist, who probably intended to overthrow the United States government and fashion himself in the image on Napoleon had it not been for John Adams dissolution of Hamilton's standing Army before it could even be formed. Hamilton was never in favor of the Bill of Rights (see The Federalist #84), was never an advocate of free speech. and used his post as Treasury Secretary to advantage his banker friends. The fact that he is on our $10 Bill is a disgrace.
Aaron Burr was a hot headed traitor to this nation, charged with treason four times, but never convicted because the evidence was not available at the time (it is now). Burr intended to lease land from Spain, then use it as a base to conquer and take much of the land from America obtained in the Louisiana purchase. Burr was no founding father, His highest office of Vice President was only obtained because he could deliver to Jefferson electoral votes in New York (because of family ties) necessary for Jefferson to assume the office.
The real founding fathers and other early leaders, the likes of Thomas Jefferson, James Madison (The primary writer of both the Constitution and the Bill of Rights), John Adams were all opposed to the code duello, and were advocates of Free speech. (The exception being John Adams and the alien and sedition acts, which he reluctantly signed and immediately regretted. One must remember at this time Presidents were reluctant to issue a veto even if they disagreed with the bill fearing it to be undemocratic.) The founding fathers did not kill each other over free speech. A few of their lesser contemporaries did.
Violence is not the answer for mature people in solving quarrels. Using ones mind and voice is a far more effective method than punching someone. Violence should be reserved for defensive purposes, such as in the situation where one feels their security is threatened.
Last edited by Caltex; 05-02-2008 at 05:10 PM.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|