Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumbleweed
Unless the US changes it foreign policy of force in the Middle East, 2006 might seem like a cake walk. 
|
At this point a change of policy, IMO, will be impossible. Current administration is grasping at straws to achieve 'victory' in an attempt to redeem some scrap of their badly tarnished legacy. Throw in Saud support of Sunni resistance to Shiite revenge genocide, a US economy that can't reduce military expenditures without sinking GDP, world demand for oil, mix and top with Israeli real estate policies for expansion of US/Israeli force.
Current administration set aggressive, military enforced policy and maintained same by continual refocus of the general public. In Iraq we went from WMDs to deposing a tyrant to a democratic Iraq to spreading democracy in the ME and now making Iraq self-sustaining in civil and military matters with a puppet Shiite government aligned with Iran with both hands deep into in US money pockets. All accomplished, if that means anything, while excluding the entire former Sunni government and military. Does it get any dumber?
I don't know what it'll be, maybe Iran, maybe N. Korea (difficult due to China/N. Korea and US/Israeli special relationships with China using N. Korea as a border buffer), maybe Syria, maybe a terrorist attack on the US, but we will have another refocus by our sleazy, self-serving leadership. Unless, of course his father says no, he does have the political power, but he's never denied his son anything in a life notable for the son's personal and business failures.