Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 02-04-2007, 03:50 AM   #1 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Hoist the Chinese Soft Power

CNS January 29 -- Singapore's "Joint Report" published today, entitled "China pushing the world toward soft competition," the commentary said. In recent years, China's Confucius, sports and film stars, the panda, manned spacecraft. Many different persons and so on the Three Gorges Dam, in the international community have created a powerful Chinese soft power. The article pointed out that in the blind pursuit of hard power, balancing tough international competition, promote healthy competition in the international soft power '+document.title+'
wewe--00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2007, 10:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,254
Country:
Country:
China says that it rejects "hard power" (bombs and missiles). However, I don't believe it. No country who has hard power, ever rejects hard power. Countries only reject hard power, when it is not in their interests to use hard power. That includes the United States, Europe and Russia.

China has very little hard power right now, so of course it is easy for them to say that they reject the use of hard power. Once China's economy grows some more, I expect China to develop as much hard power as the United States.
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 06:56 AM   #3 (permalink)
Governor General
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois View Post
China says that it rejects "hard power" (bombs and missiles). However, I don't believe it. No country who has hard power, ever rejects hard power. Countries only reject hard power, when it is not in their interests to use hard power. That includes the United States, Europe and Russia.

China has very little hard power right now, so of course it is easy for them to say that they reject the use of hard power. Once China's economy grows some more, I expect China to develop as much hard power as the United States.
I don't agree with the last sentence. Chinese mentality is very different from American mentality. Americans are more or less influenced by Christian monotheism missionary spirit, which propelled America to act more aggressively in global affairs. However, Chinese are always inward looking. The majority of Chinese won't care what is happening in the other parts of the world.
Luke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 12:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,254
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke View Post
I don't agree with the last sentence. Chinese mentality is very different from American mentality. Americans are more or less influenced by Christian monotheism missionary spirit, which propelled America to act more aggressively in global affairs. However, Chinese are always inward looking. The majority of Chinese won't care what is happening in the other parts of the world.
I don't agree with this comment for a multitude of reasons. The US "mentality" is not Christian monotheism. It is national self-interest. All nations on the planet generally operate according to that principle. Of course, China says it is different, but that is because it serves their interest to do so. China's technology is very weak right now. They couldn't even build engines for their fighters. They are still working on that. So, does China actually have a choice but to say that it's policy is for peace?
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right