|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|
02-12-2007, 09:43 AM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
|
Earl
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,570
|
We have no "Chinese Model" to promote. We believe every country shall has its own models. We respect each African country as an independent unity, and we don't impose our own ideas on others.
This must be a new policy. The Chinese government condemned the changes in government of European countries in the former Warsaw Pact and refused to establish diplomatic relations with them for some time.
__________________
chicken butt
|
|
|
02-12-2007, 12:30 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
|
Governor General
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 666
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
So, since the US did immoral actions in the past, then immoral actions should be perpetuated ad infinitum?
A million wrongs make one right?
|
I don't consider it the past when one looks at our support of Saud, Israeli and Iraq Shia policy.
__________________
These are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. ~Groucho Marx~
|
|
|
02-12-2007, 08:54 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
|
Governor General
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 737
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois
Huh? When I compare things, both things being compared usually exist at the same time. I guess I got a little bit confused when you started justifying China's present and future actions based upon what the UK did 70 years ago.
You've changed your argument. You dropped the "stingy" argument. What happened to that one? Is the West stingy or not?
I guess however little China gives, and however much the West gives, it somehow works out that China is generous and the West is stingy. 
|
Western are still stingy. Because compared with what western countries have robbed from Africa in the past, the aids to African countries from the west is still trivial.
China have never robbed any thing from Africa, or sold African people as slaves, so despite the fact Chinese aids are less than the aids from western countries, China is not stingy. Also bear in mind that which developing country except China has ever giving a lot of aids to other countries???
|
|
|
02-12-2007, 08:59 PM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
|
Governor General
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 737
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois60
We have no "Chinese Model" to promote. We believe every country shall has its own models. We respect each African country as an independent unity, and we don't impose our own ideas on others.
This must be a new policy. The Chinese government condemned the changes in government of European countries in the former Warsaw Pact and refused to establish diplomatic relations with them for some time.
|
That is probably because of their interference of Chinese domestic issues like Tiananmen Incident.
|
|
|
02-12-2007, 09:56 PM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,254
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanhope
Hey WEB. YEs, whites is about 10%. little more actualy, more like 15%, and then we have a people that is called the Colourds (their name for themselves) which is a mixed race between whites, blacks and the Malay slaves that was brought in. There is a rather large Indian population, and then the smaller ones like the San (Bushmen), Arabian, Jewish, etc. etc. etc.
|
Thanks. Didn't know that. 
|
|
|
02-12-2007, 10:12 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,254
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by george.d
I don't consider it the past when one looks at our support of Saud, Israeli and Iraq Shia policy.
|
Oh, so you do believe two wrongs make a right, so long as the wrongs are committed at approximately the same time. It seems that with some minor tweaking on when an action is committed, you are basically fine with corrupt dictators and regimes who commit genocide.
|
|
|
02-12-2007, 10:16 PM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,254
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke
Western are still stingy. Because compared with what western countries have robbed from Africa in the past, the aids to African countries from the west is still trivial.
China have never robbed any thing from Africa, or sold African people as slaves, so despite the fact Chinese aids are less than the aids from western countries, China is not stingy.
|
It's interesting. I've made a lot of friends in the US, known a lot of people and taught a lot students. None of them ever imported any slaves. I never owned any slaves either. I've made some contributions to African causes though. I assume most Chinese have not. So both of us never owned slaves, I donated money, the Chinese didn't and yet according to your logic, a Chinese has no moral high ground over me, doesn't contribute money like I do, but I'm stingy and they are not?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke
Also bear in mind that which developing country except China has ever giving a lot of aids to other countries???
|
I would bear it in mind, if you will tell me how much Chinese aid has been given to Africa.
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 01:28 AM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
|
Earl
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Potchefstroom, South Africa
Posts: 1,559
Country:
Country:
|
I fear that we are seeing two of the worst things in Africa's history, happening again, and this time at the same time:
1. A new coloniszing force
2. Africa once more becomming the 'battlefield' in a new cold war
Lastly, Luke, if China is so concerned with the people of Africa, why are you building palaces for presidents in places like Namibia and Sudan, and not houses for the poor in those same countries????????
__________________
“The subject no longer has to be mentioned by name. Someone is sick. Someone else is feeling better now. A friend has just gone back into the hospital. Another has died. The unspoken name, of course, is AIDS.”
“From the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry, the AIDS problem has already been solved. After all, we already have a drug which can be sold at the incredible price of $8, 000 an annual dose, and which has the added virtue of not diminishing the market by actually curing anyone.”
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 10:05 AM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
|
Earl
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,570
|
That is probably because of their interference of Chinese domestic issues like Tiananmen Incident.
Most of the Eastern bloc nations changed government before Tianamen. China condemned it becuase China up until very recently believed in spreading revolution.
__________________
chicken butt
|
|
|
02-13-2007, 02:03 PM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
|
Earl
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Potchefstroom, South Africa
Posts: 1,559
Country:
Country:
|
Yeah, not hey are content in trying to maintain their own revolution.
Anyway, I have been turned into a bit of a hypocryt today - my father phoned me to tell me that an offer have been made on our family bussiness (been in the family for a while) by a Chinese group.
They also already have some government contracts (which we have been steadily losing due to the governments Black Economic Empowerment program). My father says the 'stockholders' (our name for family members) are seriously considering it. So it seems I might be coming into some money thanks to Chinese inroads into Africa.
What is a man to do???
(BTW, I still say we have to be carefull of China)
__________________
“The subject no longer has to be mentioned by name. Someone is sick. Someone else is feeling better now. A friend has just gone back into the hospital. Another has died. The unspoken name, of course, is AIDS.”
“From the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry, the AIDS problem has already been solved. After all, we already have a drug which can be sold at the incredible price of $8, 000 an annual dose, and which has the added virtue of not diminishing the market by actually curing anyone.”
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|