I submit to you all that there is an ongoing effort to recolonize the African
continent.This recolonization effort is being implemented by many of the former
European colonial countries.Also involved are certain departments at the United Nations.There reasons are varied, and this whole process is to be kept out of the mainstream media and is not to be distributed to the general public.

Can you be more specific?
Are you talking about the French army presence in many of its former colonies, or are you talking about the UN backed EUFOR mission to the Chad, or something entirely else?

And what reasons do you mean?

__________________
"Every country gets the cuisine it deserves"

Recolonise Africa as in send more people over there in general (as if they weren't overpopulated already) or send more Europeans over there so regain control (eventhough we are almost fully in control as is)?

The military presence of France in the entire continent is something every European should be ashamed of - until 2005 they were still actively replacing dictator after dictator as they felt suit in countries like the CAR.

__________________

I mean there is a ongoing effort to gain
indirect control of Governments and natural resources perportrated by European nations.

Not only by Europe, but also by China and pretty much any other developed nation on the planet. In the post-Cold War era, influence is no longer the coin of the realm - more so than ever before it is raw commodities and resources now. Africa is unfortunately the new battleground in a fight to the death for all of its timber, minerals, and oil.

This is exactly the point Iam making diligent_d.

And corrupt governments are too happy to be sold in this way, ascountreis like China keep them in power. Butthe west shouldnot think themselves innocent, themoney given to buy these recources are used for the same purpose. but it is not so much governments doing thiscolonisation, but companies (like it wasin the 1600's and later).

AH

__________________
“The subject no longer has to be mentioned by name. Someone is sick. Someone else is feeling better now. A friend has just gone back into the hospital. Another has died. The unspoken name, of course, is AIDS.”
“From the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry, the AIDS problem has already been solved. After all, we already have a drug which can be sold at the incredible price of $8, 000 an annual dose, and which has the added virtue of not diminishing the market by actually curing anyone.”

I just wonder myself, who is the worse guy for Africa in the game. Is it still Europe or are others already on their best way to take the lead in ruining Africa?

__________________
"Every country gets the cuisine it deserves"

I'd say a few African's are up for that prize, with guys like Mugabe (who runs every campaign on letting people know about he's fight against neo-colonialism), the Sudan Prez and our favourite frien, Gadaffi.

AH

__________________
“The subject no longer has to be mentioned by name. Someone is sick. Someone else is feeling better now. A friend has just gone back into the hospital. Another has died. The unspoken name, of course, is AIDS.”
“From the point of view of the pharmaceutical industry, the AIDS problem has already been solved. After all, we already have a drug which can be sold at the incredible price of $8, 000 an annual dose, and which has the added virtue of not diminishing the market by actually curing anyone.”

Is Gadaffi that bad?

__________________
"Every country gets the cuisine it deserves"