View Single Post
Old 10-12-2007, 06:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
Dragon Horse
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Washington DC - Room 101
Posts: 399
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Dragon Horse
Here is what I know.

No Muslims no problem.

If we stop letting Muslims (not Arab Christians) come here we would not worry about security problems.

Most Muslim terrorist are from Egypt, Saudi, and Pakistan...like 90% of them.

If we did not allow them to immigrate here would would have less security problems.

Why do they want to come here anyway and live with ungodly infidels. Why don't they migrate inside their beautiful modern Muslim paradises (oh wait there are no developed Muslim countries opps forgot).

A change in immigration policy of Western nations would clear up a lot of them. Trade with them all you want, but don't let them live here. There is no reason we should let in large populations of people we know have a high chance of becoming radicalized. They don't have to be terrorist to support terrorist, refuse to inform on people, and protest in the street (as they often do in Europe) telling us to 'convert to Islam or die" etc.

Some might say, "well this is a recent thing and we need to think deeper about the situation". Okay, well until figure it out we should have a moratorium on immigration from countries with known radicalized populations as the one's I have named before.

What I know is that Japan is heavily dependent on oil from Muslim countries and have supported American troops in Iraq...Koreans the same. Despite that there have been no terrorist attacks or threats on them, but there was in Singapore on the government there.

What is the difference?

S.Korea and Japan don't import a lot of Muslims. Singapore has a significant segment of the population who are Malay/Indonesian Muslims.

It is kind of like saying. We we should work to solve crime, but also lock the door in the meantime. I don't think that is illogical.
Dragon Horse is offline   Reply With Quote