View Single Post
Old 09-17-2007, 01:37 PM   #19 (permalink)
Izzibeth
Nicest Moderator
 
Izzibeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,719
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Izzibeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkv View Post
In all seriousness the leading physicists have learned to cooperate with religion. A leading author who used deny GOD ,today writes a book called God created Numbers..
It was not necessary but somehow he admitted a basic fact that he doesnt know everything.
That's wonderful. That being said, just because he changed his mind doesn't mean that a god suddenly exists. He doesn't know everything. And what does this have to do with biologists being hanged for the theory of evolution?

Quote:
Whereas some of the scientists have gone against the religion. There is nothing which prevents them from denying God. Not only they deny . They declare God as Virus.
They should be prevented from denying god now? If people were prevented from denying god, asking questions about existence, and doing research into the answers to those questions then human beings would never have EVOLVED into something more intelligent. Or.. they would have.. just much more slowly.. since you can try to "prevent" people from denying or questioning god but it usually doesn't work very well. And again I haven't seen the latest scientific journal but I'm sure that the front page article isn't about how gods are "viruses".

Quote:
All mature prespectives already tend to respect the diversity of knowledge and cultures. But here we find a case which is finding its consistency only if it declares Religion as Virus. Thats why poked the sentiments of biologists.
Again, nobody has said this. I don't know who told you this but they lied.

Quote:
Science must take back its theory of mindless gene replication and purposeless existence ... or we will have to deal with the serious political problems in future.
You can't "take back a theory". It is either proven wrong, proven right, or remains a theory. Gene replication is not necessarily "mindless". There is a method to it (there's that old education thing again!). As for a purposeless existence... why does there need to be a purpose? I find the NEED for a purpose to life kind of troubling, myself. But science doesn't claim that there is no purpose to life.

Quote:
There are enough people who will die for their faith.
Trust me........ everyone knows this.
Izzibeth is online now   Reply With Quote