View Single Post
Old 08-05-2007, 04:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
Xibit
Mercenary
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodog View Post
You still haven't proven your claim that AA is not race based discrimination..
That's irrelevant here. And your take on whether I have proven my claim or not is irrelevant too. You had your own TV stuff blow up in your face. So your statement means nothing.

But once again... THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT THAT.


Quote:
pointing out that MLK was for AA does not change its definition.
And??? YOUR POINT???

Thread Title: MLK and AA type preferences

Thread Commentary: It is, indeed, a national tragedy that so many people are willfully ignorant of what MLK proposed
and [how they] actually portray MLK and his beliefs in a way that's completely at odds with what he believed and proposed...



STILL WAITING FOR YOU TO FIND AND GET ON THE SUBJECT!


Quote:
I do not have to prove your cherry picking because you have yet to prove that AA isn't race based.
Excuses... excuses... You act like you can't understand what the word PRINCIPAL means.


Quote:
Your refusal to prove that it isn't now that your "but white women benefit too" argument is dead proves that you are cherry picking.
My argument must have died for chronic laughter... You sure didn't do a damn thing to kill it. The fact is: YOU'RE DEAD! You've run out of ammo. You have no hops and you just can't compete. That's why you're still getting POSTERIZED and SLAM DUNKED on.


QUESTION: How is MLK's views "evidence"??


I'll repeat as many times as it takes you to answer it; honestly.


*

Last edited by Xibit; 08-05-2007 at 05:15 PM. Reason: edit
Xibit is offline   Reply With Quote