Thread: Rich vs. Poor
View Single Post
Old 05-22-2007, 07:37 PM   #9 (permalink)
perdidochas
Baron
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,114
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scribbler1 View Post
Not necessarily. That's just an elitist point of view and absurd on its face when put in a general term like that.


It's also hard to know if they WERE "self-made" anyway. Better to judge the rich, poor AND middle class on an individual basis.
Of course it's elitist. However, elitism is justified. Do you think the Founding Fathers were a bunch of poor farmers? OF course not, they were a rich political elite. Do you think we've ever had a president who wasn't part of the elite? Of course not. The elite are superior, and not just for birth reasons--they rise to the top.

Of course, ideally, we should judge people as individuals, and I do. However, barring more specific information, stereotypes (as long as you aren't to rigid about them) are not a bad thing. As a group, it's fairly easy to categorize people and generalize. It is human nature, and it is probably essential to our survival that we can group things together in our minds.
perdidochas is offline   Reply With Quote