"US 'doomed' if creationist president elected: scientists" - Page 3 - Political Forum

LessGovMrPrez · 01-09-2008, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodog

That is completely idiotic. The link proves that at some point humans had 24 chromosomes like all other primates or descended from an animal that did. There is no way to pathetically work your way around it.

Prove it. Show me where humans at one time had 24 just like an ape.

LessGovMrPrez · 01-09-2008, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodog

Another idiotic statement. That would be like asking if a dead body was murdered when there was nobody around to witness it. The end result and trail of evidence is proof enough.

Idiotic to whom? Can you show me where mankind has seen 1 species evolve into another. We are told all the time that evolution exists, yet not 1 human being in the history of the world has ever seen it occur.

Instead of calling me an idiot, why dont you give me the name of the human who has seen this so called evolution take place.

Quote:

I have given you a page long definition of scientific theory, if you still can't comprehend it then there is nothing left I can do for you.

I know the scientific method rodog. I dont need someone to explain to me how a theory is above law or for someone to try and tell me that the process of the scientific method jumps from hypothesis to law then to theory. Law is above theory, not the opposite.

rob_anderson · 01-09-2008, 12:43 PM

I AM SO SICK OF THESE PHONY "SCIENTISTS" MAKING AN "ISSUE" OUT OF THIS SUBJECT. This is not about "science" it is about taking religious liberty and freedom of belief and conscience and dissent away from Americans. What possible difference could it make what a President believes on the origin of species??? What in hell does that have to do with the Presidency.

As for kids in school, it is NOT the role of teachers to undermine the religious beliefs that parents teach them and to deny kids the right to say they don't agree with what the teacher is saying. Its just basic free speech and freedom. Most science does not even deal with biology at all, much less evolution questions. We don't teach teach kids the sufficient math and science in our schools to allow them to go on and study engineering and other technical fields in college which is why our schools are filled with foreign students. Yet, this cadre of underhanded athiest ideologues are constantly on tv ranting about the "creationists" holding back science. Its athiest ideologues who make sure the only discussion of "science" in public discourse is this evolution. Lets try teaching physics maybe; of course, there is no agenda for atheists in that. This whole contrived "debate" is bull.

rob_anderson · 01-09-2008, 12:49 PM

One more thing to think about, if these underhanded athiest ideologue "scientists" succeed in making a litmus test for Presidents about this particular matter of conscience you can be sure, mark my words, in a generation or so belief in God at all will be a litmus test for a President. Those who say they believe in God at all will be de facto barred from consideration as "qualified."

No Presidential candidate should answer the evolution question. They should simply respond that its not relevant to the job and is a matter of personal conscience.

IA_independent · 01-09-2008, 01:03 PM

I don't think the US is doomed if a creationist President is elected, but personally I'd feel more comfortable with an Atheist President. That probably won't happen in my lifetime, but I can hope.