Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 01-06-2008, 01:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
Reeve
 
Kansas_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 66
Country:
Obama's foreign policy experience

A lot, especially on the GOP side, are criticizing Obama for not have adequate foreign policy or national security experience.

But if Obama was to choose a VP with these qualities and experience, doesn't that take away the argument against him?

It's not like Bush had any foreign policy experience, but he got Cheney, who did.

So, for example, wouldn't an Obama/Biden or Richardson ticket be just fine to satisfy those who want foreign policy experience?
__________________
Loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it. ---- Mark Twain
Kansas_Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 01:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
Sovereign
 
presluc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,078
I think it would in my opinion anyway.
That is providing Obama wins the primary.
presluc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 06:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
Governor General
 
top gun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by apawllo View Post
I'm thinking that if he wins he'll choose Richardson. It seems like he could make up in experience where Obama lacks with his extensive resume.

People have been talking about Obama/Edwards. That would be an awful decision....at least SOME experience is necessary.
It won't be Richardson or Edwards. Edwards won't accept VP again and Richardson is no campaigner... and worse in debates. Smart guy I'm sure. Good diplomat. Bad candidate.

But I agree Obama will pick a good experienced running mate.
top gun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 08:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Marquis
 
Caltex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,042
Country:
If Obama gets the nomination, the only way he stands a chance is with Biden as his VP to make up for his total lack of experience. Regardless I think a McCain/Romney ticket would annihilate them.
__________________
Caltex is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 09:18 PM   #5 (permalink)
Governor General
 
top gun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caltex View Post
If Obama gets the nomination, the only way he stands a chance is with Biden as his VP to make up for his total lack of experience. Regardless I think a McCain/Romney ticket would annihilate them.
No Republican ticket can win in 08. It's CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE from anything Bush and that includes his Party.

And I'd seriously doubt it would be Biden as VP either... even though I too think he is great!

It does Obama little good to pick an New England Democrat. That vote will already be locked up Democratic. It does nothing to balance the ticket (electorally).

More likely look for someone from the South or West. Or it's possible even retired General Wesley Clark.
top gun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 09:20 PM   #6 (permalink)
Baron
 
prrriiide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,106
Country:
Country:
And just which one of those jack-legs has a degree in foreign relations AND has lived in other parts of the world?

**CRICKETS CHIRPING**

Some of you people make it sound like he rolled off the back of the turnip truck yesterday.

Like the foreign policy of the neo-cons as signed off on by the Republicans has been such a rousing success...I SERIOUSLY doubt Obama could possibly mess up as bad as the current administration has. BushCo's definition of "foriegn relations" seems to be "fucking other countries."

And AFA National Security...well, that's why we have this position called the National Security Advisor, who works with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretary of Defense to advise the President on National Security matters...
__________________
Tax & Spend > Borrow & Spend

I reject your reality and substitute my own.


Every feeling you've ever felt can be found in the works of Beethoven, Bruckner, Mahler, and Wagner.

prrriiide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 09:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 229
Country:
My main problem with Obama has been his lack of experience that he flips to be the candidate of "hope" I never thought of his vice-president having the experience and if Obama wins the primary and chooses someone with enough experience then i think he would be a great candidate.
nerv14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 10:09 PM   #8 (permalink)
Earl
 
Shiva_TD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by top gun View Post
No Republican ticket can win in 08. It's CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE from anything Bush and that includes his Party.


The Republican candidates are also saying that they will "change the course" and many will believe them. To discount the Republican chances is foolish.

Quote:
And I'd seriously doubt it would be Biden as VP either... even though I too think he is great!

It does Obama little good to pick an New England Democrat. That vote will already be locked up Democratic. It does nothing to balance the ticket (electorally).

More likely look for someone from the South or West. Or it's possible even retired General Wesley Clark.
While I will not vote for Obama I would say that Wesley Clark would be a good VP running mate.
Shiva_TD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2008, 10:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
Baron
 
prrriiide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,106
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
The Republican candidates are also saying that they will "change the course" and many will believe them. To discount the Republican chances is foolish.
Hard to change course when all of the GOP campaigns have numerous advisors from the far right neo-con dogmas. Giuliani is the worst, with his gang, but Romney and even Huckabee have people that have been involved in the current administration. Believe me, when the general campaign starts, those advisors will be like an albatross around the GOP candidate's neck.

Podhoretz (sp?) and his cronies will cost Giuliani the election when the Dems out them for the rabid neo-cons they are.
__________________
Tax & Spend > Borrow & Spend

I reject your reality and substitute my own.


Every feeling you've ever felt can be found in the works of Beethoven, Bruckner, Mahler, and Wagner.

prrriiide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 10:56 AM   #10 (permalink)
Earl
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,570
Foreign policy is less about experience and more about principles, instincts, and leadership. At least for a President. The nuts and bolts of who is in charge where and what the issues are between the various nations is a job for the State Dept, not the President.
__________________
chicken butt
francois60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right