Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 12-31-2007, 03:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,758
Why the Romney and Edwards surges?

As I'm sure many of you have seen, Mitt Romney and John Edwards have surged to the lead in Iowa. I haven't heard this in the discourse on this website, so I wanted to touch on "second choices". As multiple sources have said, Mitt Romney is the most popular second choice amongst Republicans, and John Edwards is the most popular second choice amongst Democrats.

As the Republican race in Iowa has come down to just Romney and Huckabee, supporters for other candidates are starting to pick between the two, and Romney is getting most of those picks. This will also help Romney in other states, as he isn't just the top second pick in Iowa, he's the top second pick in the nation.

The same holds true for the Democrat race. Voters have noticed that it really is just a race, in Iowa and the nation, between Clinton, Obama, and Edwards. Edwards holds the most sway as a second pick candidate, in Iowa and across the nation, so Edwards is quickly picking up votes from those who have supported Biden, Dodd, Gravel, Kucinich, and Richardson. Anyone who stopped supporting Hillary or Obama likely threw their support behind Edwards.

I think that, in the future, we should be paying close attention to these candidates. Neither of them are the top picks nationally, or even in second place, but they both hold the most sway as second pick candidates, and this will help them in almost all state primaries when it comes down to the wire.
Troianii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2007, 11:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,254
Country:
Country:
I thought Obama was the favorite pick for second choice. I thought that only the Democratic caucus had the second choice option, and the Republicans didn't have second choice options.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.

Sebelius for VP, not Hillary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 02:29 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois View Post
I thought Obama was the favorite pick for second choice. I thought that only the Democratic caucus had the second choice option, and the Republicans didn't have second choice options.


No, I'm not familiar with Democratic second choices options, I thought that you only voted for one candidate.

Anyways, what I'm talking about, at the very least in the case of the Republicans, is that when people see that their favorite isn't going to win their state they vote for someone else, usually Romney.

I'll have to look up links when I get a chance.
Troianii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 03:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Governor General
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rock Hill, South Carolina
Posts: 812
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troianii View Post
No, I'm not familiar with Democratic second choices options, I thought that you only voted for one candidate.
Iowa doesn't have a primary; they have a caucus. It's very different and really weird. I don't understand how it works.
__________________
Carolina Politics Online

Sam
SamInTheSouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 03:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Socialist Republic of New Jersey
Posts: 683
Country:
Country:
Long story short for the caucus:

There are several rounds of voting. THe process takes hours, so its much more involved then a primary. For the first round you go in and "vote" for your favorite candidate. After that round the candidates with the least votes (I beleive it works on a threshold) are eliminated, and then you have either the choice of going home or picking a different candidate. This process repeats until there is a winner.

And Edwards had been the second choice candidate of roughly 50% of the Democratic electorate just a couple weeks ago. I assume that's still true.
Albinonewt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 05:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 1,758
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheSouth View Post
Iowa doesn't have a primary; they have a caucus. It's very different and really weird. I don't understand how it works.
I think everyone knows that. For convenience, we don't ever say things like "the Republican primaries and caucuses", we just say primaries.
Troianii is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right