Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 12-17-2007, 02:58 AM   #11 (permalink)
Earl
 
AzTeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 1,535
Country:
Country:
Sorry I didn't answer in so long but I was quite busy this weekend, so here it goes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bankers_War View Post
If you abort a fetus, are you not killing the entire world?
No, sure not. You could use the same argument about, for example, a war. If you go to war (let's take as an contemporary example the Iraq) and some of your troops shoot a civilian, even if just by accident...did your troops just kill the entire world? Doubt it, atleast I'm still here. Or take capital punishment for instance. If you inject poison into a man, even if he is guilty of god knows what...are you, again, killing the entire world? If you look at it, isn't the US killing the entire world day by day? (OK...maybe some would say yes, but not in the way that you meant it )

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bankers_War View Post
What if someone (say an Angel or Alien) aborted Adam or Eve? Would you be here? Would I?
As far as my knowledge is concerned, Adam or Eve where never "born". They were "created" and then were there. So the analogy to the current topic is not clear to me.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bankers_War View Post
Abortion is worse than the Holocaust, because Abortion is sanctioned by the State. The Holocaust was never sanctioned by the State and there's even serious argument against Hitler ever knowing it was happening. The Holocaust was an accident as far as pragmatists can say, and was at best, the collective urge to kill their enemies at most only at the junior high-leadership level such as Majors, Captains, Colonels etc.
Uhm...to keep it polite...I'll just say NO! I'm in no position to question your sanity, but please do some reading on the topic if you really believe that stuff.

As to Abortion being worse than Holocaust...I don't think so. "The" Holocaust was an aimed attempt to exterminate an entire Religion, if you will even a bit arbitrary, since there is no logical reason or any fact that would make jews (or other peoples targeted) worth less.

Abortions though often come out of necessity. I am strictly against abortion for any reason other than "necessity", don't get me wrong, but if a 16 year old (for whatever reason) with absolutely no perspective in life gets pregnant, her boyfriend turns his back on her and maybe she's even lost support from her relatives, then yes, do abort. Even if you see this from a religious point of view - that child will be 10 times better off in heaven (considering it has never sinned, where else should it go?) than with the broken life it is more than likely to live. Same counts for rape-victims that get pregnant.
__________________

Last edited by AzTeK; 12-17-2007 at 03:10 AM.
AzTeK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 03:06 AM   #12 (permalink)
Earl
 
AzTeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 1,535
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by colourislast View Post
What are your ideas for ending the Aids pandemic? Quarantine would work, it may not be the right way or a nice way, but it would work. "Education" has not worked so well in Africa. In some cultures it is a belief that to get rid of Aids you have sex with a virgin. I am not looking to defend the quarantine theory, so I would have no answers as to how to go about doing it. I was just wondering what you felt was the right way to go.
There are many things in the world that "would work" but can't and must not be done for the sake of everything the western world believes in - human rights being only the tip of the iceberg.

Have you ever thought why "education" has not worked in Africa? That's because noone is really trying to educate them. The entire western world profits from these peoples staying uneducated and engaged in one civil war after another. Any form of governmental aid is just to try and save face in front of the public. However, in places (like the countries we live in) where the government for their own good is interested in really educating people, I think it's working fairly well - with room for improovement though.

You could of course also redirect money for a couple of misfunded projects to AIDS-research. Take...let's see...the Iraq war maybe? I'll bet anything any day that we would have long come up with a cure if even only a fraction of what the world spends to wage wars is redirected to finding a cure for AIDS.
__________________
AzTeK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 03:28 AM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 47
Country:
Abortion is legalized murder. The entire foundation of our laws, correct me if im wrong, is to protect the innocent from harm. I am not allowed by law to harm another person, to do bodily harm, financial harm, etc. How can killing the most defenseless be legal?

"A womans right to choose"...makes me wanna puke! A woman DOES have the right to choose, there are hundreds of means of birth control to prevent pregnancy...not to mention abstenance. A woman old enough to bear child is old enough to know what causes pregnancy!...its not a shock that you get pregnant if you have unprotected sex. A woman has the right to choose to use birth control or abstain from sex all together if she doesnt want to risk pregnancy! Once she is pregnant she is sharing her body with another person...its no longer JUST her body, and she should have no more legal right to kill that defenseless person than I have legal right to walk up and shoot someone on the street!
eryan2369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 04:17 AM   #14 (permalink)
Earl
 
AzTeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 1,535
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by eryan2369 View Post
"A womans right to choose"...makes me wanna puke! A woman DOES have the right to choose, there are hundreds of means of birth control to prevent pregnancy...not to mention abstenance. A woman old enough to bear child is old enough to know what causes pregnancy!...its not a shock that you get pregnant if you have unprotected sex. A woman has the right to choose to use birth control or abstain from sex all together if she doesnt want to risk pregnancy! Once she is pregnant she is sharing her body with another person...its no longer JUST her body, and she should have no more legal right to kill that defenseless person than I have legal right to walk up and shoot someone on the street!
A man old enough to discuss this topic also knows that nomatter how many different forms of birth control either partner uses, there is always a chance (if you look at the figures even an asonishingly "good" chance) of the woman still getting pregnant And "abstenance from sex" tastes a bit like the ideology of a religious group that takes itself a bit too seriously, but sure, it's a possibilty (the only safe one). And you also left rape-victims out all together.

EDIT: Wait, I forgot sterilisation. I suppose that's also a rather safe bet...

Appart from that the law already massively differentiates between a fetus and a normal citizen, in pretty much every category. So why should this be an exception? An unborn child, for example, has no right to inherit anything. It is only when it is actually born that it becomes a heir (that's just one example form the top of my head). In other words, a fetus is, in the eyes of the law, not what would in a general be called a "person". having said that, I wouldn't be sure if the term "murder" from a legal standpoint really applies in the first place.
__________________

Last edited by AzTeK; 12-17-2007 at 07:20 AM.
AzTeK is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 08:25 AM   #15 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
Country:
Aztek, you had a possible idea there, sterilize all women that have an abortion. That way they will never have to bother having that wart grow back.....what a forward thinker you are......I think I like this forum.
Enigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 12:25 PM   #16 (permalink)
Aya
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma View Post
You are correct, abortion is much worse.
Do you mean this honestly?

I don't think so. The Holocaust is total different compared to abortion.
About abortion you can argue, but you cannot argue about the Holocaust.
And I don't see any similarities in it. If there are similarities, tell me.

I hope Mike Huckabee won't be president. If I think about his positions about gay rights etc. then I think he would be the worst president. Not to mention foreign policy...
Aya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 01:36 PM   #17 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freya* View Post

I hope Mike Huckabee won't be president. If I think about his positions about gay rights etc. then I think he would be the worst president. Not to mention foreign policy...
Lets see, what does the Holocaust have in common with abortion, Hmmmm, how about millions of dead people. No I am not for sterilization,geeze.

BTW What are his positions on gay rights? And whatever they happen to be, how would his views on that subject actually affect his foreign policy? Just curious...tks
Enigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 07:10 PM   #18 (permalink)
Governor General
 
top gun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 818
Quote:
Seer;117671] Ok that’s reasonable. It’s just that when I see him in the republican debates he seems to cream all the rest of them, but I could be wrong.
Hey you're absolutely right... Huckabee has been playing to the hard right base better than anyone.

But have you noticed that now he's finally getting scrutiny from all over the place? Before he started doing better no one was even really looking at his record.

I think tax hike Mike will wear thin pretty quickly. But I'm no Republican strategist (and wouldn't want to be ).
top gun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 07:26 PM   #19 (permalink)
Baron
 
Seer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 945
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by top gun View Post
Hey you're absolutely right... Huckabee has been playing to the hard right base better than anyone.

But have you noticed that now he's finally getting scrutiny from all over the place? Before he started doing better no one was even really looking at his record.

I think tax hike Mike will wear thin pretty quickly. But I'm no Republican strategist (and wouldn't want to be ).
I think his late popularity could have been a part of his strategy. Most of the candidates have been in the public eye for so long, people are starting to get sick of them. I think Huckabee assumed that would happen and got in the race later on in the game (that sneaky bastard)… but seriously, his plan seemed to have worked because he’s jumped up higher than just about anyone in this race. If more stories come out like the one you provided, he will have a short lived popularity however.
__________________
My pick: Barack Obama
A issue I’m concerned with
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
Seer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 11:36 PM   #20 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 205
I'm not sure why you feel the way you do. Abortion has killed tens of millions of unborn humans in the US over the last 40 years, and hundreds of millions around the world. In terms of numbers its pretty unprecedented. Not having compassion for these kids seems cold hearted to me, but I guess we think differently.

As for AIDS, there is no reason to get into the issue of a quaranteen today because its not going to happen. However, human rights do not give someone the right to expose others to communicable disease. Most societies can use quaranteen when necessary. Its an accepted practice to control diseases. Again, its not going to happen for AIDS, so there's no reason to raise the issue one way or the other (politics would prevent it).
rob_anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right