Political Forum

Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Forum Today's Posts Posts Since Last Visit Join the Members Map!
Go Back   Political Forum - US & World Political Discussion Forums > Forum Rules - Special Topics > The 2008 Election

View Poll Results: Which candidate will win the presidency?
Hillary Clinton (D) 12 40.00%
John Edwards (D) 3 10.00%
Rudy Giuliani (R) 3 10.00%
Barack Obama (D) 11 36.67%
Mitt Romney (R) 1 3.33%
Fred Thompson (R) 0 0%
Voters: 30. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-22-2007, 03:54 AM
Banned
The Flag Bearer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 96
Location: San Francisco
Country:
If The General Election(s) Were Held Today...

Who among the front-runners of each party do you think would be elected president?

Last edited by Panamaniac : 08-22-2007 at 10:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2007, 10:16 AM
Viscount
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,475
In terms of strict modeling based on past performance, that prediction is accurate.

However, Iowa especially defies modeling. Iowa is very unpredictable and the winner could get a big boost on the Democratic side.

On the Republican side, it's the big states that matter. Iowa and NH often produce surprises on the GOP side, but for some reason GOP voters in other states don't give a shit. I'm not sure why early wins in IA and NH influence Democrats in other states but not GOPers in other states.

Perhaps Democrats are more lemming-like?
__________________
chicken butt
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2007, 03:40 PM
Viscount
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,475
I don't know. Republicans tend to become sheep after the guy is elected. During the nominating process Republicans kick the tires and look under the hood a lot more than Democrats. The Democrats just figure "Well, Iowa says candidate X is good, so I guess he's the guy!"

Republicans are like, "Where the hell is Iowa and why should I care?"

Then when a Democrat is elected, Democrats spend the next four years attacking their own President. If a Republican is elected, Republicans spend the next four years explaining that he sits at the right hand of God and is not to be questioned.
__________________
chicken butt
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2007, 03:50 PM
Bradgriff's Avatar
Governor General
The Truth Hurts
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 852
Location: West Sacramento
Country:
Hillary 50%
Guiliani 47%
November 11, 2008

mark my words
__________________
“I think every good Christian ought to kick Falwell right in the ass.”-Barry Goldwater
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2007, 07:00 PM
Seer's Avatar
Baron
Awesomeness incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 945
Location: Oregon
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bradgriff View Post
Hillary 50%
Guiliani 47%
November 11, 2008

mark my words
It’s still to early to tell with such accuracy.
But this is a very good guess IMO.
__________________
My pick: Barack Obama
A issue I’m concerned with
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2007, 07:06 PM
Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 187
I think the red states will be a little surprised this year. While many will vote 65-35 for the Republican, they will find that the states that will define this election will vote about 52-55 to 48-45 for any Democratic candidate. The result will be about a 3-5 point difference in the popular vote, but a rather sizeable difference in the electoral college. The Electoral College math will finally turn against them this year.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2007, 07:16 PM
Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 187
Sabato's Crystal Ball - A MAP IN FLUX?

An interesting map.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2007, 05:47 PM
Temporarily Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 100
Location: Arkansas
Country:
I'd rather jump off a building than vote for them. If those are my chooses, I'm using a write in. I'm sick of the same damn people getting into office. When will Americans realize that this is not in their best interest?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2007, 07:11 PM
Baron
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,114
Location: Pensacola, FL
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois60 View Post
In terms of strict modeling based on past performance, that prediction is accurate.

However, Iowa especially defies modeling. Iowa is very unpredictable and the winner could get a big boost on the Democratic side.

On the Republican side, it's the big states that matter. Iowa and NH often produce surprises on the GOP side, but for some reason GOP voters in other states don't give a shit. I'm not sure why early wins in IA and NH influence Democrats in other states but not GOPers in other states.

Perhaps Democrats are more lemming-like?
GOPers realize that Iowa and NH are two weird little states that don't make much of a difference.
__________________
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
— Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2007, 07:12 PM
Baron
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,114
Location: Pensacola, FL
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MountainMike View Post
Maybe we should change the party animal mascots for a donkey and an elephant to a lemming and a sheeple?
Dems are both lemmings and sheeple. What would you use for Republicans?
__________________
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
— Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right