Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 07-23-2007, 02:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,231
Country:
Country:
Question Is backing the poor a risky strategy for Edwards?

The poor, according to the statistics used in this article, make up less than 15% of the United States. The poor have less time to vote and may be less reliable voters than middle class Americans. Is this a fundamental weakness of the Edwards campaign?



Edwards risks backing the poor


Though Edwards has not abandoned his concern for the middle class, poverty is now his issue.

By: Roger Simon
Jul 18, 2007 06:36 AM EST

.....

Edwards is a product of the American middle class. His father worked in a textile mill, and his mother ran an antique refinishing business and then became a letter carrier when her husband left the mill. Like many in the middle class, they sometimes had trouble making ends meet, a fact Edwards often stresses in his campaign speeches.

On Dec. 29, in a Des Moines community center, Edwards gives the most electrifying speech of his campaign.
"Today, under George W. Bush, there are two Americas, not one: One America that does the work, another America that reaps the reward. One America that pays the taxes, another America that gets the tax breaks. One America that will do anything to leave its children a better life, another America that never has to do a thing, because its children are already set for life. One America, middle-class America, whose needs Washington has long forgotten, another America -- narrow-interest America -- whose very wish is Washington's command. One America that is struggling to get by, another America that can buy anything it wants, even Congress and a president."
The audience roars its approval. Edwards will come in second in Iowa and earn a place on the national ticket. It is now just after Christmas last year and John Edwards is running hard for president of the United States.

....

Though Edwards has not abandoned his concern for the middle class, poverty is now his issue. It is a risky switch. Just under 13 percent of the U.S. population lives in poverty, a shockingly high figure in a nation where hundreds of thousands of people recently lined up for the privilege of buying a $599 iPhone.

But the American middle class is vastly larger, probably about 75 percent of the population. Further, middle-class Americans, unlike poor Americans, have time and money to give to political campaigns. Which is why most presidential campaigns prefer to champion middle-class causes, while paying only lip service to poor causes.

But not John Edwards, who this week is on a "poverty tour" of America, trying to get citizens to focus on the poor (and not on his haircuts, his homes or his hedge funds) and to make a commitment to "sacrifice" in order to cut poverty by a third in the next 10 years and eliminate it in the next 30 years. I asked him not long ago if there was not a huge political risk in this, if there is not a risk in championing the poor while other candidates are talking about heaping benefits on the middle class.

"There is clearly a political risk, no question," Edwards said. "But I actually believe this is what America needs." When you talk to people in crowds after political speeches, they always say they would be willing to sacrifice for a candidate or a cause that inspires them. Edwards is going to find out if that is true.

---------------------------

Source: politico.com
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 01:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
Baron
 
prrriiide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,106
Country:
Country:
I don't think so. Generally, by helping the poor, you also help out a lot of middle class people in the process and I think the middle class voters are sophisticated enough to realize that. That said, I'm not sold on Edwards. He has some good points and some bad, like the rest. I think the fundamental weaknesses in his campaign have more to do with perceptions of sincerity and a fear that he'll tax the bejeebers out of everybody, middle class included. Unless he can put that baby to bed fast, he'll get creamed.
__________________
Tax & Spend > Borrow & Spend

I reject your reality and substitute my own.


Every feeling you've ever felt can be found in the works of Beethoven, Bruckner, Mahler, and Wagner.

prrriiide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 01:23 AM   #3 (permalink)
Mercenary
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 281
Schadenfreude

It will hurt him in the general election though not in the Dem primary. The Repugnacan Party has many members who, their pieties not with standing, are deeply gratified by schadenfreude. The party of hate needs many sacrificial victims and the defenseless "poor will always be with us."
Apotropoxy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 02:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Earl
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,559
It will hurt him in the Democratic primary because the poor are backing Clinton and Obama.

Edwards' primary source of support isn't the poor, it's upper class whites.
__________________
chicken butt
francois60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 06:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
Baron
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,114
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by political recon View Post
The poor, according to the statistics used in this article, make up less than 15% of the United States. The poor have less time to vote and may be less reliable voters than middle class Americans. Is this a fundamental weakness of the Edwards campaign?
Edwards is the fundamental weakness of the Edwards campaign. He's a lightweight--he's a one term senator who didn't run for a second term because he knew he would lose. Heck, he didn't even win his own state in the election.
__________________
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
— Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love
perdidochas is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right