Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 07-21-2007, 01:29 AM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,991
Country:
Barack Obama - Preventing Genocide Isn't Worth It, Calls America Occupiers

Was Barack Obama ever seriously in the race for the Democratic nomination for President? Doesn’t he know that he is supposed to lie to his constituents and at least pretend that he cares about the innocent people being slaughtered by Islamic radicals?

Apparently not. As we can see, he is more concerned about government mandated sex ed for 5 year olds than he is with the murder of hundreds of thousands of children, women and men elsewhere.

Quote:
Source: AP
SUNAPEE, N.H. (AP) — Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.
As if that wasn’t enough Obama tried to explain this twisted attempt to lobby for the withdrawal of U.S. forces in Iraq by comparison to other interventions the U.S. hasn’t participated in.
Quote:
“Well, look, if that’s the criteria by which we are making decisions on the deployment of U.S. forces, then by that argument you would have 300,000 troops in the Congo right now - where millions have been slaughtered as a consequence of ethnic strife - which we haven’t done,” Obama said in an interview with The Associated Press.

“We would be deploying unilaterally and occupying the Sudan, which we haven’t done. Those of us who care about Darfur don’t think it would be a good idea,” he said.

Obama, a first-term senator from Illinois, said it’s likely there would be increased bloodshed if U.S. forces left Iraq.
Of course we all know that being a Senator doesn’t tmean that you actually know what you are talking about so perhaps he will be forgiven. Even Bill Clinton came back to admit that he made a mistake on Rwanda.

Obama is all over the map on this and none of it is good. He even stooped to using the anti-American label that is predominant in his circle of supporters on the left by calling Americans occupiers and then proceeded to say that the United States can not win.

Quote:
“There’s no doubt there are risks of increased bloodshed in Iraq without a continuing U.S. presence there.”

The greater risk is staying in Iraq, Obama said.

“It is my assessment that those risks are even greater if we continue to occupy Iraq and serve as a magnet for not only terrorist activity but also irresponsible behavior by Iraqi factions,” he said.

The senator has been a fierce critic of the war in Iraq, speaking out against it even before he was elected to his post in 2004. He was among the senators who tried unsuccessfully earlier this week to force President Bush’s hand and begin to limit the role of U.S. forces there.

“We have not lost a military battle in Iraq. So when people say if we leave, we will lose, they’re asking the wrong question,” he said. “We cannot achieve a stable Iraq with a military. We could be fighting there for the next decade.”

Obama said the answer to Iraq - and other civil conflicts - lies in diplomacy.

“When you have civil conflict like this, military efforts and protective forces can play an important role, especially if they’re under an international mandate as opposed to simply a U.S. mandate. But you can’t solve the underlying problem at the end of a barrel of a gun,” he said. “There’s got to be a deliberate and constant diplomatic effort to get the various factions to recognize that they are better off arriving at a peaceful resolution of their conflicts.”
Oprah what do you say to this? For someone who stands against genocide so brutally, how can you actually support someone who makes such comments. I guess it is a black thing.

Here’s the 411 for Barack Obama. Terrorists negotiate with people heads sitting on their chests and body limbs flying across the village square. They do not discriminate against the children and their sworn enemy (us), and they are the occupiers who have entered Iraq, not the United States. BTW, the United States entered Iraq when Hussein failed to meet the requirements of a U.N. mandate so his garbage about this being a U.S. mandate is simply that, garbage.

Is there really a group of people out there that think this guy is a leader? Stupid critic does not equate to fierce critic. American occupiers, negotiating with terrorists is a solution, PREVENTING GENOCIDE IS NOT WORTH IT!

Thank God that Barack Obama was not leading this country during WWII because most of us would probably never have been born if he was.

Webloggin added to this commentary.
superdude17* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 04:24 AM   #2 (permalink)
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cebu, Philippines
Posts: 118
Country:
"the United States entered Iraq when Hussein failed to meet the requirements of a U.N. mandate"

That is a total and complete fabrication, or to be plain, you are lying.

The U.N. required a written report of weapons programs and full access for inspectors. The report was delivered and inspectors were on the ground with full access doing their job when the U.S. ordered them out and began its invasion. There is no mandate for anything. Iraq is a war crime and Bush should hang for it.
expatincebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 08:52 AM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 1,319
Country:
I may like Obama as a candidate but even I think that's gonna kill him sooner or later.
micfranklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 10:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cebu, Philippines
Posts: 118
Country:
I think Obama is a headpiece filled with straw.
expatincebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 12:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
Knight
 
Coyote Says's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by XenonII View Post
Why doesn't he go back to Africa? America may be morally sick, but it's not so sick that it's going to elect a black muslim as president. Muslims should have all been deported starting on 9/11. The demonrats will have to come up with a serious candidate if they want to win the presidency, some negro muslim left wing extremist or a feminazi lesbian whore from hell will not do.
Obama is not from Africa. Last time I checked, he was an American citizen. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe citizenship is a requirement to even be considered for the job.

Oh, and using the word "negro" probably isn't gonna win you too many converts to your cause, unless you're posting at Stormfront.
__________________
American Politics Forum LogoPolitics Forum
Coyote Says is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 12:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by micfranklin View Post
I may like Obama as a candidate but even I think that's gonna kill him sooner or later.
Either that or AIDS or a suicide bombing will.
XenonII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 12:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Knight
 
Coyote Says's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by XenonII View Post
He's an African Muslim making him not even remotely suitable to be president. I don't care what his citizenship is he doesn't belong in America. We need bans on people like him running for president just like we need a ban on woman running for the job. It makes a mockery of the post. What's wrong with the word negro? Have liberals now decided we can't use that to describe these people? I thought it was more polite than using the other word beginning with N that everyone used to call them before the jews turned it into something nasty. There is nothing wrong with being a white nationalist or the website Stormfront either.
Uh....right. Well, go on and post at Stormfront, then.
__________________
American Politics Forum LogoPolitics Forum
Coyote Says is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 12:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coyote Says View Post
Uh....right. Well, go on and post at Stormfront, then.
Why should I? Is Stormfront the only place on the net that allows freedom of speech? Ifyou don't like what I post then don't read it! No one is forcing you to and you can't tell me what to do. I will tell the truth about blacks and other problem groups in this country that are doing their best to destroy America (liberals basically, America doesn't need enemies when it has so many from within) whether you like it or not!
XenonII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 12:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
Knight
 
Coyote Says's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by XenonII View Post
Just imagine if Obama was president muslims would be in control of the US and we would have to live under the brutal laws of Islam and we would have a president that needed to have a AIDS test every week.
OK, I'm gonna leave the obvious ridiculousness of suggesting that we would have to live under Islamic law alone for now....

What makes you think he needs an AIDS test every week? Do you think he's gay? Or is it just that all black people have AIDS????
__________________
American Politics Forum LogoPolitics Forum
Coyote Says is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2007, 12:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
Knight
 
Coyote Says's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by XenonII View Post
Why should I? Is Stormfront the only place on the net that allows freedom of speech? Ifyou don't like what I post then don't read it! No one is forcing you to and you can't tell me what to do. I will tell the truth about blacks and other problem groups in this country that are doing their best to destroy America (liberals basically, America doesn't need enemies when it has so many from within) whether you like it or not!

ROFL

It's not me you have to worry about.
__________________
American Politics Forum LogoPolitics Forum
Coyote Says is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right