|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |

05-09-2008, 04:16 PM
|
 |
DoubleplusgoodMod
Larga vida y prosperidad.
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,795
Location: Planet Vulcan
Country:
|
|
|
Obama to announce victory on May 20th?
Looks like Obama is potentially penciling in May 20th as a tentative victory date, regardless of the Clinton rhetoric.
Obama plans to declare victory May 20 - David Paul Kuhn - Politico.com
Quote:
Not long after the polls close in the May 20 Kentucky and Oregon primaries, Barack Obama plans to declare victory in his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.
And, until at least May 31 and perhaps longer, Hillary Clinton’s campaign plans to dispute it.
It’s a train wreck waiting to happen, with one candidate claiming to be the nominee while the other vigorously denies it, all predicated on an argument over what exactly constitutes the finish line of the primary race.
The Obama campaign agrees with the Democratic National Committee, which pegs a winning majority at 2,025 pledged delegates and superdelegates—a figure that excludes the penalized Florida and Michigan delegations. The Clinton campaign, on the other hand, insists the winner will need 2,209 to cinch the nomination—a tally that includes Florida and Michigan.
|
Is this a smart idea by the Obama camp?
__________________
"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom."
Isaac Asimov
|

05-09-2008, 04:48 PM
|
|
Mercenary
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 207
|
|
|
my opinion on this is-that once OBAMA reaches the 2025-he will be declared the nominee-and once he is declared mich and fla gets seated-so the hills argument then becomes moot.OBAMA so far today has picked up 7-he is just 4.5 away from overtaking her in SUPERS-he is 168 away from 2025-he may be declared nominee before may 20-who knows-this hill thing about playing the race and gender card is all over the news and internet-perhaps SUPERS will pull the plug now.
|

05-09-2008, 07:54 PM
|
 |
Mercenary
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 205
Location: Oceanside, CA
Country:
|
|
|
Obama needs to let the DNC announce the winner - in my opinion, but he can and should keep on touching up on the subject as he gets closer and closer.
If he gets 2025 and the DNC says it offical then I think he should follow suit... in the mean time, I really think its time for Hillary to hang up her hat - the math just doesn't add up. Her only chance is for super delegates and Obama has a bigger popular vote - ITS OVER FOR HER.
|

05-09-2008, 08:15 PM
|
 |
Hermes' Bird Moderator
Are you looking for a bean shop, my friend?
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,573
Location: Amestris
Country:
|
|
Quote:
|
And, until at least May 31 and perhaps longer, Hillary Clinton’s campaign plans to dispute it.
|
I think this just about sums it up. I wouldn't put it past Hillary to run as a third party just to screw Obama over.
__________________
Just A Humble Bounty Hunter
"Is there an indelible line dividing sanity from insanity? Or do they change, one into the other, at the slightest turn of events? We'll find out, soon enough, if the world itself is insane."
Discuss the Issue, NOT the Poster
|

05-09-2008, 08:44 PM
|
 |
DoubleplusgoodMod
Larga vida y prosperidad.
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,795
Location: Planet Vulcan
Country:
|
|
|
Hillary running as a third party candidate would not sit well with the party, no doubt, and that would quickly hurt any chance of her getting to run in 2012. That is a probable scenario, but that is all contingent on whether she feels she could viably run again after this.
__________________
"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom."
Isaac Asimov
|

05-09-2008, 08:45 PM
|
 |
DoubleplusgoodMod
Larga vida y prosperidad.
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,795
Location: Planet Vulcan
Country:
|
|
|
Personally, though I am an Obama supporter, I do not want Obama to make his victory announcement until he's reached the delegate count number. The party should make the announcement.
__________________
"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom."
Isaac Asimov
|

05-09-2008, 11:03 PM
|
 |
Squire
Never Discount The Youth Vote
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 135
Location: Colorado
Country:
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by emptypepsi
Personally, though I am an Obama supporter, I do not want Obama to make his victory announcement until he's reached the delegate count number. The party should make the announcement.
|
I agree with you on every count. What is the one thing that Obama could do to disenfranchise Hillary voters even more? Declare victory while she denies it. I can understand that he wants to move onto the regular election and he sees this as a way of discrediting Hillary so that he may focus his full attention on McCain, but if he does decide to declare victory, it's going to prove to be a poor move. If Hillary makes the decision to continue with her campaign all the way to the convention, I could see Obama declaring a week or two prior to the convention, just so that the unpleged delagates won't have to feel guilty about supporting him.
__________________
"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors."
~Plato
|

05-10-2008, 08:02 AM
|
|
Viscount
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,260
|
|
|
Whether the superdelegates pledge or not, nothing is decided until the actual vote occurs unless Clinton chooses to concede before the convention.
The superdelegates can even choose to abstain, thus denying either candidate a majority on the first ballot.
90% chance Obama's got it in the bag, but Clinton will have 48% of the delegates. Remember that Ted Kennedy only had 36% and tried a floor challenge in 1980.
__________________
chicken butt
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|