Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
So I've already got a thread on historical attack ads. Given that we're just entering the beginning of the general election phase, there are going to be a lot of attack ads. Not all of them will make it into the historic attack ads threads. They are still fun to watch anyway. So this thread is just for the 08 attack ads.
Can we ask? attack ad on Obama
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.
Here's an RNC attack ad on Obama. I'd call it a loser. It fundamentally says don't tax oil companies, that will lead to less oil production. I think that even Republicans have lost faith in that kind of supply-side economics.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.
I told you this was gonna happen. This is only the beginning. The Obama's like to throw low punches, and then they go running to the media crying.
They cried foul when The Clinton's declared a kichen sink strategy,but you have Michelle say this trype of crap:
...
Let's stop the hypocrisy Barack Hussein Obama!!!
I believe that's an old video, not that it fundamentally changes the issue. In any case, I just don't find your comments credible, since you would probably cheer any dirty attack by Clinton on Obama. So your words are the hypocritical ones.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.
I believe that's an old video, not that it fundamentally changes the issue. In any case, I just don't find your comments credible, since you would probably cheer any dirty attack by Clinton on Obama. So your words are the hypocritical ones.
It's not my words Dubois! It's the facts....
If you're gonna attack be ready for others attacking you and don't whine...
In regard to the oil companies, a better approach is to plead for fairness. The Democrats want to repeal tax breaks for oil companies while keeping tax breaks for their friends in the coal and agriculture industries. Obama is one of the worst offenders in this regard.
The motivations are entirely political. The oil industry is mainly in red states and mainly supports Republicans. Coal and agriculture mainly support Democrats.
If you're gonna attack be ready for others attacking you and don't whine...
Your are saying that your words are not your words, which is a ridiculous lie. In any case, your words remain hypocritical since you would likely accept any dirty attack on Obama, so your calling foul on Michelle Obama is the hypocrisy that you speak of.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.