Political Forum

Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 10:55 PM
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
Moderator
McCain lied about Clark, don't run from lies
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,645
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois60 View Post
In regard to the oil companies, a better approach is to plead for fairness. The Democrats want to repeal tax breaks for oil companies while keeping tax breaks for their friends in the coal and agriculture industries. Obama is one of the worst offenders in this regard.

The motivations are entirely political. The oil industry is mainly in red states and mainly supports Republicans. Coal and agriculture mainly support Democrats.
Can you show proof that the majority of oil companies who would be affected by a windfall profits tax are located in red states?
__________________
Formerly W.E.B. Du Bois (you can still call me "WEB")

Current Diplomacy thread
WEB Music Playlist
Protest Animal Cruelty
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 11:00 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 226
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois View Post
Your are saying that your words are not your words, which is a ridiculous lie. In any case, your words remain hypocritical since you would likely accept any dirty attack on Obama, so your calling foul on Michelle Obama is the hypocrisy that you speak of.

That's not what I'm saying. You did not hear my words on that clip, did you? I'm simply pointing out the double standards in the Obama camp.

You keep personally attacking me here. I'm not a hypocryt as everyone here knows where I stand with Obama. I know where I stand with my issues.

My point is: That The Obama camp can use the race card and insult others, but when they get attacked they go to their friends from MSNBC AND CNN to help them.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 11:09 PM
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
Moderator
McCain lied about Clark, don't run from lies
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,645
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by calidem411 View Post
That's not what I'm saying. You did not hear my words on that clip, did you? I'm simply pointing out the double standards in the Obama camp.
I did read your hypocritical words, that's why I was able to identify them as such. You call Michelle's comments "crap" and "low punches", yet I don't believe any posts of your can be found that complain of "crap" and "low punches" that Clinton throws at Obama. I see a double standard, but it's a different one than what you are talking about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by calidem411 View Post
You keep personally attacking me here. I'm not a hypocryt as everyone here knows where I stand with Obama. I know where I stand with my issues.
I'm not personally attacking you. I'm just pointing out that your comments on Obama and Clinton are hypocritical. You condemn low blows coming from the Obama campaign, yet your posts indicate an approval of low blows coming from the Clinton campaign. That's hypocrisy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by calidem411 View Post
My point is: That The Obama camp can use the race card and insult others, but when they get attacked they go to their friends from MSNBC AND CNN to help them.
My point is that your point is partisan: totally pro-Clinton and anti-Obama. So your criticism of Obama for doing something wrong is meaningless, since you give a free pass to Clinton for attacks, but contradict that with criticism of Obama for attacks.


WEB
__________________
Formerly W.E.B. Du Bois (you can still call me "WEB")

Current Diplomacy thread
WEB Music Playlist
Protest Animal Cruelty
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 01:29 AM
Viscount
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,480
Can you show proof that the majority of oil companies who would be affected by a windfall profits tax are located in red states?


Use your common sense. Where is the oil in this country? In red states. Where the companies are headquartered isn't particularly relevant.
__________________
chicken butt
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 01:39 AM
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
Moderator
McCain lied about Clark, don't run from lies
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,645
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois60 View Post
Use your common sense. Where is the oil in this country? In red states. Where the companies are headquartered isn't particularly relevant.
Your argument is more like a half-baked theory. How do you know that we won't be taxing BP (British Petroleum) or Citgo (Venezuela) or the profits oil companies get from their oil reserves in countries outside of the United States? You don't know that, do you?
__________________
Formerly W.E.B. Du Bois (you can still call me "WEB")

Current Diplomacy thread
WEB Music Playlist
Protest Animal Cruelty
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 05:16 AM
Viscount
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,480
Either way, Democrats do not represent the oil industry because they do not represent oil states. They would never do to coal or ethanol interests what they do to oil interests.

The coal and ethanol subsidies will remain in place while oil companies lose their tax breaks. That is known as favoritism.
__________________
chicken butt
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 06:08 AM
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
Moderator
McCain lied about Clark, don't run from lies
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,645
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois60 View Post
Either way, Democrats do not represent the oil industry because they do not represent oil states. They would never do to coal or ethanol interests what they do to oil interests.

The coal and ethanol subsidies will remain in place while oil companies lose their tax breaks. That is known as favoritism.
Either way, your opinion is totally unsubstantiated with facts as usual. Just totally made up bullshit.
__________________
Formerly W.E.B. Du Bois (you can still call me "WEB")

Current Diplomacy thread
WEB Music Playlist
Protest Animal Cruelty
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 07:38 AM
Viscount
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,480
He said as the Democrats just voted near unanimously for a bloated farm bill despite the fact that farm prices and incomes are at record highs.

Food prices are high and do the Democrats respond by attacking food like they attack oil producers? Of course not.
__________________
chicken butt
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 10:29 AM
colourislast's Avatar
Governor General
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 728
Location: Arizona
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois View Post
Your argument is more like a half-baked theory. How do you know that we won't be taxing BP (British Petroleum) or Citgo (Venezuela) or the profits oil companies get from their oil reserves in countries outside of the United States? You don't know that, do you?
If certain people are elected into office all this will come true. Fewer countries will export to the U.S. because of higher taxes and tariffs and domestic oil companies will export more jobs and possibly move off shore to escape the heavy taxation. Maybe even sell the company to foreign investors.
__________________
I am more concerned with the intellectual environment

'Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not.'

~ Thomas Jefferson

64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right