|
|
|
Dear guest,
Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.
This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.
All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)
|
 |
|
04-07-2008, 01:44 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Knight
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 535
Country:
|
the government is only as good as we the people let them be-we have over the years become so complacent that sometimes people vote candidates into office without doing any research,it is always baffling to me to ask someone who they voted for and they say,oh i just picked 1, i don't really care. i am really impressed this year to see the enthusiasm that obama has risen,and i do hope that more of us keep involved after the election, if we are all watchdogs for our elected officials i think we can keep corruption down to a minimum
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 01:45 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Conscript
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 44
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreRepsDems
Vote for Nader then ! He will fight against the corruption that you just
pointed out !
Remember if you feel you have to vote for the lesser of two evils and you
win, you are still supporting and giving power to Evil !!!!!
So when you get screwed over by your own evilness don't complain about it !
It's time for Americans to Bite the Bullet and clean up the mess we've
allowed the REP-DEM Monopoly to bring to America !!!
Or you can go back to supporting them and watch them bring the country
down even farther !
|
Im not voting for nader, he is an idiot. His views don't fit with mine just about at all. Ron Paul is simply too extreme and some of the things he wants to do simply don't work. Far as I am concerned, there isn't a politician out there who is grounded to reality and is for the people.
Last edited by JimmyFord; 04-07-2008 at 01:45 PM.
Reason: typo
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 02:19 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27
Country:
|
People call Ron Paul extreme all the time, please tell me how is he extreme? He just wants to follow the very law of the land as intended to be, and that is said to be, but isn't. I read his foreign policy book this past week, and I have a lot more respect for the man than ever, he's a very rational man with wisdom that is on par with that of the founding fathers, and countless other men of wisdom with historical perspective into foreign affairs, and economies. What he's saying is what we're doing is extreme, and it wont last forever, and will end very badly... but we're bringing it all upon ourselves. To me thats a bit more extreme to me.
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 02:29 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Knight
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 409
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyFord
Which candidate is going to cut the spending? None. They are all going to increase spending from 19.5 billion (mccain) upward to over 200 billion(obama and clinton). None of them are addressing the budget issues we are facing.
.
|
Hmmm.. That's a difference of 180 billion. If cutting the budget is the most important thing to you, then I think the choice would be obvious.
That said, I agree with your thesis.
Bro
__________________
Goldwater caused nerve ends to twinge with his passion and indignation. Yet he had no handle to the problems, no program, no solution- except backward to the Bible and the God of the desert. Proud of his handsome, clean-lined family, proud of his radiant children, proud of his families war record and patriotism, he had in him neither the compassion nor the understanding to deal with the faceless newer enemies of the Digital Society -Theodor H. White from 'The Making of the President-1964'
Last edited by Big Brother; 04-07-2008 at 02:32 PM.
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 02:32 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Earl
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Graz, Austria
Posts: 1,535
Country:
Country:
|
Concicely put, I think that people in the US and around the world put too much hope into the US president. The US president, if he was to do what he's supposed to do (aka "follow the goddamn constitution") really only has a rather limited field on which he can excercise power, and honestly, that's a good thing. Sad thing it's not being adhered to.
I'd say the US president has become more powerful than he was ever meant to be, and, as with the FED, so much power concentrated on one institution (extremely put, even just one person) is never good.
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 03:03 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Conscript
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 44
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeirdJoe
People call Ron Paul extreme all the time, please tell me how is he extreme? He just wants to follow the very law of the land as intended to be, and that is said to be, but isn't. I read his foreign policy book this past week, and I have a lot more respect for the man than ever, he's a very rational man with wisdom that is on par with that of the founding fathers, and countless other men of wisdom with historical perspective into foreign affairs, and economies. What he's saying is what we're doing is extreme, and it wont last forever, and will end very badly... but we're bringing it all upon ourselves. To me thats a bit more extreme to me.
|
The gold standard does not work. It is an obsolete system. In a world of globalization and growing market, the gold standard would cause another great depression. It is one of the main reasons the great depression was not stopped. We The People act would prohibit the supreme court from ruling on any cases regarding religion. He is extreme when it comes to cutting the budget.
I agree with his foreign policy, and if we were voting based on that alone, I would be all for him. We are not though. Alot of issues he is far too extreme on. When it comes to drug laws, he is too extreme in his stance. I use to be a supporter of his but I found that he was just too radical when it came to the economy. The economy is a really big issue with me, and his stances would not help it.
Although I agree we need to cut programs I don't see a comprehensive plan from him in how he is going to go about doing it. I see all the things he is going to cut, but how is he going to go about doing it is my issue.
He is not the point of this thread though. The point is how insignificant the president is, yet how many people act like we are voting for dictator of the united states. Like it was the only election that matters or something.
Ron Paul wouldn't bring about the changes necessary to better this country, nor would any other candidate running.
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 03:04 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Conscript
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 44
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Brother
Hmmm.. That's a difference of 180 billion. If cutting the budget is the most important thing to you, then I think the choice would be obvious.
That said, I agree with your thesis.
Bro
|
Yeah, ron paul or giuliani, since they were the only two candidates running that cut the budget. Mccain increases it, obama and clinton just increase it more. They are still all increasing it, so they are all equally worthless in my eyes.
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 04:01 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Governor General
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 676
Country:
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyFord
They ruled india because the people allowed them to rule. Once they said "no more" what happen to the british that "ruled" india? They had no choice but to leave.
|
absolutely ~ by then brits no longer had control of discourse either.
still the vatos provided troops by the millions to fight and die in far off lands that nothing to do with their well being ~ so it does show what can happen when a small group has control of discourse.
and don't think that it cannot happen or is not happening in the u.s. of a either 
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 07:36 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyFord
The gold standard does not work. It is an obsolete system. In a world of globalization and growing market, the gold standard would cause another great depression. It is one of the main reasons the great depression was not stopped. We The People act would prohibit the supreme court from ruling on any cases regarding religion. He is extreme when it comes to cutting the budget.
I agree with his foreign policy, and if we were voting based on that alone, I would be all for him. We are not though. Alot of issues he is far too extreme on. When it comes to drug laws, he is too extreme in his stance. I use to be a supporter of his but I found that he was just too radical when it came to the economy. The economy is a really big issue with me, and his stances would not help it.
Although I agree we need to cut programs I don't see a comprehensive plan from him in how he is going to go about doing it. I see all the things he is going to cut, but how is he going to go about doing it is my issue.
He is not the point of this thread though. The point is how insignificant the president is, yet how many people act like we are voting for dictator of the united states. Like it was the only election that matters or something.
Ron Paul wouldn't bring about the changes necessary to better this country, nor would any other candidate running.
|
I strongly disagree, and the new deal did nothing but heighten the great depression. Gold has and always will be the backing to paper money, which when it doesnt turns into FIAT money. We're letting the Fed unconstitutionaly counterfiet money and its indebting us as a nation. And when you look all through history, that was reason number 1 of a fallen global empire, from within and the economy, not an outside force. And we just happen to be borrowing and indebting ourselves to a millitary enemy and probably the up and coming next big influence on the world economy (China). Our economy is just a falsified notion of whatever it is right now, and nothing more... the only real thing is huge debt. And it was manipulated in that fahsion by a sepperate entity of the government, the very one the founding fathers said would tear apart the government before any standing army... a centralized banking system. Its happened all through history... its just our chapter right now.
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 07:48 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Conscript
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 44
Country:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeirdJoe
I strongly disagree, and the new deal did nothing but heighten the great depression. Gold has and always will be the backing to paper money, which when it doesnt turns into FIAT money. We're letting the Fed unconstitutionaly counterfiet money and its indebting us as a nation. And when you look all through history, that was reason number 1 of a fallen global empire, from within and the economy, not an outside force. And we just happen to be borrowing and indebting ourselves to a millitary enemy and probably the up and coming next big influence on the world economy (China). Our economy is just a falsified notion of whatever it is right now, and nothing more... the only real thing is huge debt. And it was manipulated in that fahsion by a sepperate entity of the government, the very one the founding fathers said would tear apart the government before any standing army... a centralized banking system. Its happened all through history... its just our chapter right now.
|
Ok for starters, gold backed dollar is what caused the government to be unable to act during the great depression. People started pulling all their money out and the government couldn't print more money so the cash flow in the market came to a hault, causing a further dive.
The system of fiat money isn't the problem, it is the people who abuse it when put into power. This day and age calls for a fiat money system. What it doesn't call for is the abuse of such a system.
Not to mention you sound like your parroting a Ron Paul speech or something. You act like I've never heard this argument before or something. Without a fiat money system, we would be in a great depression right now, remember that.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
 |
|