Political Forum



Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

Old 04-05-2008, 11:33 PM   #11 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,254
Country:
Country:
Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan, but not in Florida.

By the way, is that a British carrier in your avatar or is it a US amphibious assault ship?
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.

Sebelius for VP, not Hillary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 11:43 PM   #12 (permalink)
Conscript
 
politicaldisgust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 32
Country:
I think her words are just a way to stay relevant in a race she knows she is losing. like any other candidate she can say whatever she wants, even if it is absurd. Hopefully educated voters and educated delegates will disregard her "suggestions" and follow the rules.
I believe in the process and honestly feel that in the end the delegates will follow the rules and the correct person will win the nomination.
__________________
Political Disgust
politicaldisgust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 11:45 PM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sasebo Japan (originally from Seattle,Wa)
Posts: 333
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois View Post
Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan, but not in Florida.

By the way, is that a British carrier in your avatar or is it a US amphibious assault ship?
ok, Im a little confused, I thought that Obama was not on the ballot in Florida, is that not correct?
yes, you have a good eye, that is the multi-purpose amphibious assault ship USS Essex (LHD-2) Its my ship I was somewhere in there when that photo was taken,lol
libertarian0507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 11:52 PM   #14 (permalink)
Marquis
 
Caltex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,042
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian0507 View Post
ok, Im a little confused, I thought that Obama was not on the ballot in Florida, is that not correct?
yes, you have a good eye, that is the multi-purpose amphibious assault ship USS Essex (LHD-2) Its my ship I was somewhere in there when that photo was taken,lol
Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan. He was on the ballot in Florida.
__________________
Caltex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 11:59 PM   #15 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sasebo Japan (originally from Seattle,Wa)
Posts: 333
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caltex View Post
Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan. He was on the ballot in Florida.
ok, so I mixed those two up, my apologies .
libertarian0507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 01:31 AM   #16 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,254
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian0507 View Post
ok, Im a little confused, I thought that Obama was not on the ballot in Florida, is that not correct?
yes, you have a good eye, that is the multi-purpose amphibious assault ship USS Essex (LHD-2) Its my ship I was somewhere in there when that photo was taken,lol
Thanks.

I'm a military technology/history enthusiast. I toured the USS Wasp when it came in for fleet week at NYC many years ago. It's amazing how most countries in the world cannot afford a ship like that. That ship would be considered a regular aircraft carrier by British and French standards.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.

Sebelius for VP, not Hillary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 02:19 AM   #17 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sasebo Japan (originally from Seattle,Wa)
Posts: 333
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois View Post
Thanks.

I'm a military technology/history enthusiast. I toured the USS Wasp when it came in for fleet week at NYC many years ago. It's amazing how most countries in the world cannot afford a ship like that. That ship would be considered a regular aircraft carrier by British and French standards.
The Wasp, of which class we belong Yes, its true that the US Navy is really unequaled in the world. A British aircraft carrier is easily identified by a long upward sloping flight deck. A Wasp class LHD is sort of a carrier, but it does not have arresting gear,which means that we can only carry helicopters and harrier jets because they can take off and land vertically. Its a pretty huge ship Its not as cool though when you have to spend a couple months out to sea on it, it gets rather boring,lol
libertarian0507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 02:56 AM   #18 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Sebelius for VP, not Hillary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,254
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by libertarian0507 View Post
The Wasp, of which class we belong Yes, its true that the US Navy is really unequaled in the world. A British aircraft carrier is easily identified by a long upward sloping flight deck. A Wasp class LHD is sort of a carrier, but it does not have arresting gear,which means that we can only carry helicopters and harrier jets because they can take off and land vertically. Its a pretty huge ship Its not as cool though when you have to spend a couple months out to sea on it, it gets rather boring,lol
Could be worse. You could have been stationed in a Los Angeles or Ohio class submarine.
__________________
Forum Rule 3: Discuss the Issue, not your opponent.

Sebelius for VP, not Hillary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 03:11 AM   #19 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sasebo Japan (originally from Seattle,Wa)
Posts: 333
Country:
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois View Post
Could be worse. You could have been stationed in a Los Angeles or Ohio class submarine.
yeah,lol When I joined they wanted me to be a submariner, I turned them down on that one,lol Trapped under the ocean with no chance to see the light of day for weeks on end does not sound very appealing to me,lol
libertarian0507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2008, 10:39 AM   #20 (permalink)
Conscript
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.E.B. Du Bois View Post
I'm not Obama. The forum rules say discuss the issue not your opponent. Unless you think I am Barack Obama, then there's no reason to leave the candidates out.



Obama did not disallow revotes. The Florida revote was out of the question. The entire state government there is Republican and they were the ones blocking the re-vote.

As for Michigan, that failed for two reasons: (1) a judge struck down a motion to find out who already voted, which was essential to having a re-vote and (2) they would not allow everyone to re-vote (they wanted to disqualify independents and repubs who voted in the first primary). So it's not that Obama would not allow a re-vote, but a judge stopped the re-vote and Hillary and the state laws prevented a fair revote.

Lastly, I believe you have failed to address Hillary's disenfranchising of voters here. Do you approve of disenfranchising voters to help Hillary?
Ok if Obama didn't disallow revotes than how come cnn said he did?

Second I'm not saying it's right for Hillary to disenfranchising votes, however what I'm asking is how is it fair for you to critisis her for disenfranchising voters. When he is doing the same thing in florida and michigan.

Third she offered to pay for revotes in flordia and michigan and flordias govener said ok(on an interveiw on CNN) but Obama and his people blocked the revote.

Lastly I don't approve of hilliary disenfranchising voters to help her. But how come you belive in disenfranching voters in florida and michigan to help Obama?
mkimkilop is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right