Political Forum

Dear guest,

Welcome to the internet's top destination for the civil discussion of politics. This is a forum for discussion and debate of the issues, and not for personal remarks aimed at other discussants.

This forum has no political affiliation and welcomes your perspective on the issues. Membership is free. If you would like to join the discussions and debates please REGISTER HERE.

All new members should review the forum rules. The "Today's Posts" button automatically adjusts itself to fit your screen on its first use for Firefox and on its second use, for Internet Explorer. Have a pleasant day. (This is a spam free board.)

  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 12:06 PM
Reeve
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 88
Those on the far left, like those on the far right are certify politically insane. They love the sound of their own voices more than the constitution and what it hope to attain. ACLU has really gone over the edge in recent years.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 12:12 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by wes445 View Post
Those on the far left, like those on the far right are certify politically insane. They love the sound of their own voices more than the constitution and what it hope to attain. ACLU has really gone over the edge in recent years.
Oh really? Can you cite a case?

The ACLU is the foremost defender of the Constitution in America today and without them many of our rights would have long since been lost. I would actually like to see them take on more issues such as undeclared war and federal programs that are not supported by the enumerated powers of congress.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 12:38 PM
Reeve
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
Oh really? Can you cite a case?

The ACLU is the foremost defender of the Constitution in America today and without them many of our rights would have long since been lost. I would actually like to see them take on more issues such as undeclared war and federal programs that are not supported by the enumerated powers of congress.
Oh ,they have been against religious display on public property, which didn't harm anyone. Oh, against the rights of a school principal to censor school newspaper. Oh, saiding that the burning of a KKK cross should only be punishable only where there was a true threat to the safety of another person.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 12:40 PM
Reeve
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 88
They have done alot good stuff don't get me wrong. Sometime they just go over the top. This has be problem with alot group like ACLU, including some of mine so-call black leaders. I support the ACLU, but sometimes they leave me shaking mine head.

Last edited by wes445 : 03-25-2008 at 12:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 02:09 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by wes445 View Post
Oh ,they have been against religious display on public property, which didn't harm anyone. Oh, against the rights of a school principal to censor school newspaper. Oh, saiding that the burning of a KKK cross should only be punishable only where there was a true threat to the safety of another person.
Those are valid constitutional issues related to the 1st Amendment.

Do you have a problem with the separation of church and state or do you believe that the government should endorse specific religions?

Do you have a problem with freedom of speech and/or expression? It is easy to allow someone to speak or express themselves when you agree with what they are saying or doing but the Right means that you must support the same right of someone that you disagree with.

These are fundamental rights that America was founded upon. Do you seriously have a problem with them?
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 02:44 PM
prrriiide's Avatar
Baron
Liberal - straight up with a twist
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,073
Location: Tennessee
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freedom Rider View Post
This thread brings to mind a somewhat scary story I heard recently.

A friend of a friend was invited to a party thrown by the ACLU - even though he is a conservative he went for the free drinks and food.

Jane Fonda's daughter was there and gave a short speech, in which she said we needed to scrap the constitution. And most of the people there applauded and cheered when she said it!

I generally lean to the left, but I found this to be chilling. Don't these ACLU idiots realize that the ACLU couldn't exist if not for the Constitution? Jeez.
I would say that lies somewhere in between a story repeated 100 times to the point of not even resembling the original facts, and an outright fabrication by someone along the line. "A friend of a friend" is usually the least trustworthy of sources. Were that to happen at an ACLU party, the person uttering those words would be, at best, unceremoniously escorted to the curb. More likely, they would be pilloried in the press and made the target of the full force and weight of the the ACLU and their lobby.

The ACLU exists for one reason and one reason only: that is; to ensure that the rights enumerated in the constitution are applied equally to all without prejudice or contrivance, no matter how distasteful the exercise of the right by the person in question might be.
__________________
Tax & Spend > Borrow & Spend

I reject your reality and substitute my own.


Every feeling you've ever felt can be found in the works of Beethoven, Bruckner, Mahler, and Wagner.

Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 03:32 PM
colourislast's Avatar
Governor General
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 728
Location: Arizona
Country:
The Constitution was forged out of political difference. What we got out of the Constitutional Conference was major compromise of opposing ideologies. Essentially a treaty of 13 different countries leaning left, right, pro-slavery, anti-slavery, federalist, republican, Whig, atheist, pious, separatist and empire driven. That is why so much is ambiguous. They realized there was no document that could encompass a nation so large. That is why it is in the document to allow all things not specifically in the Constitution to fall in the realm of states rights. With the politicians being power driven they must all bend the Constitution in order to have more. They take the ambiguity of the document and skew things in the favor of their base.
__________________
I am more concerned with the intellectual environment

'Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not.'

~ Thomas Jefferson

64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 04:19 PM
Banned
Persona Non Grata
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 365
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by prrriiide View Post
I would say that lies somewhere in between a story repeated 100 times to the point of not even resembling the original facts, and an outright fabrication by someone along the line. "A friend of a friend" is usually the least trustworthy of sources. Were that to happen at an ACLU party, the person uttering those words would be, at best, unceremoniously escorted to the curb. More likely, they would be pilloried in the press and made the target of the full force and weight of the the ACLU and their lobby..
Are you calling me a liar, priiiiide?

Do you want me to name their names? I can if you want. The friend who told me this works in a bookstore I frequent. He has written movie and band reviews for local independent papers & magazines here in Atlanta for decades; one of his editors, who edits a free music mag here called Stomp and Stammer, is the one who attended the ACLU party.

Jane Fonda lives here in Atlanta, I don't know if her daughter resides her or not. Her daughter, Vanessa, is a member of the Workers' Revolutionary Party.
I wasn't there, but from what I heard, they did not escort her to the curb for saying that we should scrap the Constitution, they applauded her.

I have no way to prove this, its just something that my friend told me last week. I really resent your implication that I would just make something like this up, I always make a point to avoid spreading around a lot of BS in my posts (as many posters seem to do).
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:01 PM
Reeve
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiva_TD View Post
Those are valid constitutional issues related to the 1st Amendment.

Do you have a problem with the separation of church and state or do you believe that the government should endorse specific religions?

Do you have a problem with freedom of speech and/or expression? It is easy to allow someone to speak or express themselves when you agree with what they are saying or doing but the Right means that you must support the same right of someone that you disagree with.

These are fundamental rights that America was founded upon. Do you seriously have a problem with them?
If a community is 90% southern baptists and their government official choose to have a nativity scene in their lobby, how is that a threat to the separation of church and state? A small minority ( less than 1 % ) of atheists complain saided it offending them. So these citizens working in their government building couldn't even said Merry Christmas because a small group found it form of mental cruelty. And if a muslim or a jew felt left out, let us ceberate their religion. I have to no problem with people or government showing religious items celebrating a event. Only communist counrty's government ban religious stuff. So you are for the tyranny of the few over the many? You wish us to be more like Russia huh? HUH! Yes I can get hysterical too if you want to go there. The only rights a high schooler has is the right of protection, general well-being and education. If they want to publish something that isn,t allow in their school paper run a underground newspaper like the high schoolers did in the sixities or hit the internet. We are more worry about their rights, then their falling SAT score or them getting shot on their way to school. Even if no one is harmed in mine family, if someone burn a cross in mine yard they will get a ass full of lead. They can get the ACLU to sue me for denial of rights. You let people disrespect a group or person how far do you think future transgression will go? Can you said Jim Crow or the Jewish Genocide or Pol Pot? I WILL SAID IT AGAIN. THE ACLU HAVE DONE GOOD. 98% OF THE THINGS THEY HAVE DONE I HAVE AGREED WITH IT. I have a problem with you getting hysterical with me cause I don't agree 100 % with them. Hell I don't agree 100% with mine own momma,but I still support her.

Last edited by wes445 : 03-25-2008 at 06:26 PM. Reason: adding more stuff,correcting alot more stuff
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:20 PM
Reeve
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 88
Can we get back to the original question?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
A vBSkinworks Design
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=

right