Clinton has so little in comparison to obama. But then she does have someone on here side that (this might sound ominously familiar) works for fox news: talking about ferraro's depature, "Anyway, she has stepped down and can now devote more time to Fox News. " source : BBC NEWS | The Reporters | Justin Webb

Obama has won more states, more delegates, he can command huge crowds at speechs, he has the moral high ground with no personal attacks like the clinton campaign, he can justifiably argue for the anti war vote, he can, although by no means has to rely on, huge numbers of young votes, important and telling considering disillusionment and apethy, he can raise more money, he is predicted to put up a better fight against Mccain.

All Clintons attacks theoretical and unproven, Obama won't be ready at 3am! Is that a joke? It's a phone, in the white house full of staff ringing. He is unexperience, this gets shot down by her him asking to run with her. She won the big states: everyone expected the democrates to win this election easily, so the fact that she won big states doesn't imply that she is needed to win the election for the democrates. She is better on the economy.... how so? It looks like the economy is in tatters anyway I think a fresh approach would be healthy.

Why is there talk of Clinton having an argument for geting the nomination?

Aside to the point I'm making : If Clinton does get the nomination the idea of democracy in USA will be shattered for me, already wobbling from the al gore winning popular vote argument, then the events of Katrina, and the fact there is so little help for americans fallen on hard times, to the realisation that America over the last twenty years or so will have been run between two families: the Clintons and the Bushs.

This election will serve to disillusion completely, or hopefully show that the system works and the world could head in a positive direction. Anyone agree?

No help for americans fallen on hard times see video on top right of search result: "Tent cities spring up in LA"
BBC - Search results for city of tents la

Well it seems some people can't see the forest through the trees--i am a fanatic because i have done the math---hillary cannot catch up on delegates-no matter how she does the math--obama just received another 7 from the iowa primaries and there are still delegates from the texas caucus which obama won and there are still some from california yet to be added to his column--he is right now 117 ahead---there is no way with the remainder of the states that she can gain anywhere near the 117- so call me a fanatic if you want-i prefer to call myself smarter and more informed than some----i will say one thing that is as clear as a bell---obama has the popular vote, more states won, and more delegates---it is clear he should win the nomination-- if the SUPERS vote for hillary--i would be barring your doors-- there will be so much unrest like you have never seen before---you can't wake a sleeping giant and then tell it to go back to sleep----

well hallaluya conscript i agree with you wholeheartedly-very well said--one thing i have been telling everyone who will listen is if hillary has had 37 years of experience and has so much influence in washington, then why in the hell is this country in such a mess and her constant dialog about how much she has done for healthcare( which congress has repudiated in the last couple of days)why is healthcare such a big issue today? sometimes if people don't pay attention these sly ones try to get you---why does she feel she has to be sly--if you tell the truth you don't have to sly your way out of anything.

Can Hillarious catch up with Super Delegates???

You would have ALOT of pissed-off people if she stole the nomination with those super delegates instead of the popular vote.